永不妥协英文电影名
A. 电影《永不妥协》的英文名
Erin Brockovich
B. 朱丽亚罗伯茨主演的经典电影叫什么
茱莉亚罗伯茨的代表作是<漂亮女人>
本片是朱莉娅·罗伯茨的成名作，是一部典型的讲述出身经历低俗的女子如何与身份悬殊的男人相遇相爱结婚的现代灰姑娘故事。
但是我比较喜欢她在<永不妥协>里塑造的单身妈妈但有着坚强个性的女性这个角色
C. 用英语写一篇 英语电影的读后感 谢谢 要电影名
《gong with the wind》 飘（乱世佳人）
See the over movie 《 gong with the wind 》 , I am very to move for ruide this person image.The ruide is handsome and natural and unrestrained, the magic power is endless, humor and wit, the strength is brave, he is rich, respecting again female, to love faithful.He again is a person who can see what others cann't, again sharp insight with the person of the self-control dint, and have to do the standard ownly.He is limitless ocean in elephant, thick forest in elephant, and can make female dependent on.The sijiali becomes friends with the ruide empress knot over the two marriage,however, ruide has been having no to changes the slightest to her the original intention, liking this in love with attitude the ream is felt by me get a fright.The writer gave the great breadth of view in ruide, he tolerate other people's mistake, respecting other people's right always.In his in the mind, men and women are complete equal.I do not know that still had the more perfect than this image what kind of male.
《小妇人》电影观后感（英文）Little woman
Little Amy stealths the show. Absolutely. Words of wisdom just slips out of her mouth so effortlessly yet so inspiring. And considering of her age, she gives a new meaning to what little woman is all about. I like the way little Amy fly about the scene with her fancy theatric moves, it’s hard not to give your attention when she is around. To be fair, she is a little bit overactive for her part, but I don’t blame her. As for her grown-up, I find the scene where she turnes down Jo’s offer of affection and bashs his jeasousy quite amusing. In fact, this is the soul of the play where everyone’s fate hangs on it. Whether it’s covincing or not can make or break the play. it’s a great pleasure to hear smart people defending and arguing for their feelings, so that they end up realizing they are not smart at all. So funny, I can play the scene time and time again in my head.
I don’t like Jo in this play. They’ve got the wrong girl to say the least. Even her beautifual black eyes and masculine eyebrow is of no help to her. The trick is you can’t call that bad acting, just that she doesn’t fit well with Jo. She sets about striking you as daring, unworldly, not bound by rules and lacking in feminiety. But she is just a tomboy. They are bunch of them nowadays and what the fuss all about her?. Jo should be someone unusual, one of a kind, out of this world. In a sense, I wouldn’t mind to call Jo an American incarnation of Joan of Arc. I have seen better. Now I have to confess her predecessor(Kathrine Herpen) is really of something.
The encounter between this Jo and her German professor is like staged romance. A silly school girl stumbling into a knowlegeable scholar who happens to be not married. Why does she get so tighten up in his room and what is that section scene in the theatre for. it’s all so cliché, second-hand romance or acting ed from other people’s genius plays, exactly like what Teddy says. And the way she throw herself to her lover and being so ready to give her heart is the last straw for me. A reformed woman, you’ll say.
If you want to know what good acting is about, just look at Meg, or the mother, though I think it’s too easy a case for Susan. Teddy’s role is delivered very well. He ‘s natural, and there’s no ambiguous thing about his feelings, so well done. Granted The problem with Jo and Teddy is in their characters, because they are of the same impulsive kind. They look at each other, and they see their own weakness, and the excitement challenging your own kind is quite childish, is’t? But the timing of self-awareness coming to you is also very important. Teddy finds his peace of mind in Amy, and Jo in professor. But I still think there’s no certainty about fate and character, not in real life, Teddy and Jo could have made the second best match. Nothing is perfect in the world, so why couldn’t they be part of it?
《阿甘正传》观后感（英文）
To be honest, this is the first time I ever write a review of a movie. And this beginning is a tough one—with an Oscar winner as its subject, surrounding which there is considerably controversy over the values it has questioned, the thoughts it tried to implicitly convey, and the art of the movie itself.
The following discussion will go on as a dissection of this movie into several aspects. This dissection is, however, necessarily incomprehensive, and I would just try to make it a original review in the eyes of a busy, yet inspirational student of science who, from time to time, glances at the palace of arts with admiration and, more importantly, love.
电影《卢旺达饭店》
Hotel Rwanda ---- a story of an African Schinderler
Hotel Rwanda is a film about a man. It was based on a real story of a man who saved 1268 people’s lives in a madness genocidal, which happened in Rwanda, 1994. The film was directed by Terry George, 2004. The main actor Don Cheadle is not handsome but just an ordinary man. You probably will even not recognize him when you happen to meet him on the street. He acted a hero based on a true story, a man who was as simple as he is, Paul Rusesabagina. Paul is a hero, a real man, while a hero and a real man doesn’t always need to be handsome or attractive in the appearance. There are two nations in Rwanda, hutu and tutsi. Paul is a hutu manager working for a 4 stars hotel on town. The hutu army planed a genocidal to clear out all the tutsi people in ruwanda. The tutsi people were suffering a madness blood bath. Over 800,000 people had been killed within 100 days. Paul has a tutsi wife, in order to protect his wife, children and other tutsis; he took them to hide in the hotel Rwanda. There are many white people from all over the world lived in this hotel so the hotel is the safest place in Rwanda to hide. There are 80 UN soldiers in Rwanda but only 4 guarded in the hotel and all of them are not allowed to shot. If we say that Paul just wanted to save his wife at the beginning, after recognized that there is no one would come to help the tutsis, Paul throw himself into the breach. He bribed the hutu general by wine and gold, used out every coin of his to purchase the refugees’ lives, ten, a hundred, 2 hundreds, 3 hundreds… more and more tutsi refugees flee to the hotel wishing to survive. To them, Paul is an angel who keeps a hope for those hopeless people in the calamity. His goodness his mercy is the key to be alive.
The hotel Rwanda is a dramatically and war film, ingeniously, there was almost no lens for slaughtering; however, the threatener of death was full filling with the whole movie. One of the tutsi asked Paul,
“Why they are so truculence?”
“ Hatred? Insanity? … I don’t know.”
The event is a humanitarianism disaster and Paul needs no reason to save the lives. When the world closed its eyes, he opened his arms. Facing a madness calamity and crazy crowds, the indivial’s power is far from enough. However, Paul saved more than 1000 people’s lives. Paul Rusesabagina is a hero, a real man, an African Schinderler.
〈撞车〉
After seeing this movie, I was able to really understand what "Six Degrees of Separation" means. There is a thread that weaves its way through the landscape of life connecting, influencing, and defining all. This movie is certainly thought-provoking, one cannot watch it without feeling either privileged to have become part of the fabric, or like a fly on the wall - seeing, yet unable to influence or guide. There is almost a sense of frustration at ones inability to be no more than an observer in this movie since it compels you to want to shout in warning, gasp in shock, cry in sorrow, and hold in comfort. "Crash" is definitely not a movie to use as a venue to escape life for a couple of hours, but it is a movie that certainly makes you take a second and third look at who you are within yourself. The actors are surprising not only for their depth of performance, but also because they do not play characters you think you know. I would highly recommend this movie to anyone who likes drama, action, comedic relief, or just an appreciation for a well-thought out movie.
《永不妥协》
In a world where heroes are often in short supply, the story of Erin Brockovich is an nspirational reminder of the power of the human spirit. Her passion, tenacity and steadfast desire to fight for the rights of the underdog defied the odds .Her victory was made even more sweet by the fact that while helping others, she in turn helped herself. Erin Brockovich is a stirring, funny and unconventional drama.
Julia Roberts acts as the twice-divorced mother of three young children who sees an injustice, takes on the bad guy and wins. while working, Erin stumbles upon some medical records placed in real estate files. Confused, she begins to question the connection. She convinces Ed to allow her to investigate, where she discovers a cover-up involving contaminated water in a local community, which is causing devastating illnesses among its residents.
Although the local citizens are initially leery of becoming involved, Erin's persistence and the personal interest she takes in their lives makes them listen. A kindred spirit, Erin is one of them, and her ability to connect with them on their level makes them comfortable, ultimately earning their trust. Helping her out is her next door neighbor George , a Harley Davidson biker whose friendship and support allows her the time to pursue the case. Going door to door, she signs up over 600 plaintiffs, and Erin and Ed, with the help of a major law firm, go on to receive the largest settlement ever paid in a direct-action lawsuit in U.S. history..$333 million. By triumphing over insurmountable odds, she is able to prove herself, and reinvent her life.
D. 十大英文励志电影
十大英文励志电影：
第1名：《阿甘正传》
阿甘（汤姆。汉克斯·饰）于二战结束后不久出生在美国南方阿拉巴马州一个闭塞的小镇，他先天弱智，智商只有75，然而他的妈妈是一个性格坚强的女性，她常常鼓励阿甘“傻人有傻福”，要他自强不息。
阿甘像普通孩子一样上学，并且认识了一生的朋友和至爱珍妮（罗宾·莱特·潘饰），在珍妮和妈妈的爱护下，阿甘凭着上帝赐予的“飞毛腿”开始了一生不停的奔跑。
阿甘成为橄榄球巨星、越战英雄、乒乓球外交使者、亿万富翁，但是，他始终忘不了珍妮，几次匆匆的相聚和离别，更是加深了阿甘的思念。有一天，阿甘收到珍妮的信，他们终于又要见面…