亚瑟王电影观后感英文亚瑟

⑴ 关于亚瑟王的传奇，谁能写一个大约一百词左右的英文简介

King Arthur was a fabled British leader and a prominent figure in Britain's legendary history. A real indivial may have been the inspiration of the legend, but any core of history is deeply submerged in the later fictional narratives of Arthur. In these he appears as the ideal of kingship both in war and peace; even in modern times he has been ranked as one of the 100 Greatest Britons of all time. Over time, the stories of King Arthur have captured such widespread interest that he is no longer identified as the legendary hero of a single nation. Countless new legends, stories, revisions, books, and films have been proced in Europe and the United States that unabashedly enlarge on and expand the fictional accounts of King Arthur.

参考维基网络的

⑵ 请问有关亚瑟王的英文评论吗

King Arthur is an important figure in the mythology of Great Britain, where he appears as the ideal of kingship both in war and peace. Legends portray him as the greatest king Britain, or the world, would ever have--the "Once and Future King"--and even today he was ranked as one of the 100 Greatest Britons of all times. He is the central character in the cycle of legends known as the Matter of Britain, which portrays him as a leader of the Sub-Roman Britons ring the Saxon invasions of the 5th and 6th centuries. Originally celebrated as a culture hero by the Brythonic peoples, by the 12th century his fame had spread to the Briton's relatives in Brittany, and from there to France, Anglo-Norman England, and the rest of Europe. King Arthur remains a household name throughout the Western World today.

There is disagreement about whether he, or a model for him, ever actually existed, or whether he is a mythic figure who has been given a historicised setting.[1] His title of 'King' is disputed: in the earliest mentions and in Welsh texts, he is never given the title 'King'. An early text refers to him as Dux Bellorum ('Duke of Battles'),[2] and medieval Welsh texts often call him ameraur ("emperor" in the pre-Medieval sense of the Latin imperator, i.e. "commander").

慢慢看哈。..呵呵

⑶ 电影【亚瑟王】观后感～

影片的人物原形来自15世纪英国最富有传奇色彩的国王--勒?莫特?亚瑟。亚瑟王更多的感性认识来自神话传说，他和圆桌骑士的故事，已然是诠释基督教传承的文化传说。历史学家们对于亚瑟王的国籍和年代问题有很多争议。本片以历史学家托马斯?马洛里的文稿基础完成剧本，认为亚瑟王是罗马人，在英国立下赫赫战功，正是亚瑟的上台，才让英国打败日耳曼部落推翻罗马帝国的统治，最后赢得了革命性的胜利。我喜欢这部电影，喜欢里面七个骑士的对自由深切的渴望。这自由面前，生命都显得不那么的动人了。在现实生活中，我们在生活的网上爬行，到处都是束缚，却鲜有人对此斗争反抗。也许，我们这样生活了太久，已经意识不到了自由的美丽了。我自认为是个比较懒散的人，不太喜欢太多的规矩，怎么舒服就怎么过。最好，逍遥的像个桃下醉仙。显然，我是在做梦了。虽然，从影评界的角度来说，亚瑟王不能算是顶尖一流，但影片中骑士间超越生死的友谊，草原上大家对自由的呐喊，以及大雪中失去伙伴的悲痛，绝对能唤起人们心中的某些情愫。

⑷ 求电影亚瑟王的英文影评800到1000字

I have always been and always will be a die-hard fan of the King Arthur stories. My family is from that area of that area of the world, so there is some deep-seated calling to it.

However, I tire greatly over the focus of the Arthur-Guenivere-Lancelot plot being the entire focus or one of the main focuses of the movie. I especially enjoyed that those character relations were subtle undertones. In that way for Aurthur-lovers you can see, "Ohh... I know what's going on there!" My favorite part, as with the Mists of Avalon, was how they meshed the Christian faith of Rome with the pagan beliefs of the knights and the people in the country. This is a remarkable depiction of how it would have been like for Christian Rome to be attempting to convert the pagan--and the relations there were remarkable, I thought.

The translation of the aloof romantic story we all know to a more down-to-earth version was amazing. In every other version we see, it's all about what's going on within the personal lives of the characters, but one of the reasons Arthur and his knights are still in our minds is because they did great things for the world, and I thought it a crime to not focus on that.

Clive Owen and Kiera Knightly were a weird pair, I admit. One is flawlessly gorgeous and the other you have to sit and think for a second before you realize he is a hottie too. There were times when I knew what was going on, but didn't really understand the character's motivations behind it, but when you hit the final scene and realize what's been done here, you feel a smile break out on your face.

At this point, if a studio is going to do something about King Arthur, it's not really about being historically or politically correct--it's about doing something that hasn't been done before, and I think that they hit the nail on the head.

⑸ 求翻译成英文 下面短文 关于亚瑟王电影

In 450 AD, the Roman empire graally into decline, and intended to evacuate from the UK, the whole nation blighted of Great Britain.Arthur was in conflict and family members, predicted that he would become a sacred British monarch.Arthur is not only the power of talent, and it has great ambition.When he saw the young country of this mess, he is determined to build a new home.Arthur warrior and extraordinary boldness of vision has made some very good knight to admit defeat, they all join Arthur, organized into a famous "knights of the round table".These brave soldiers led by Arthur heroic efforts, has achieved a proud record.In war, Arthur met their defiance called "the blues" a group of guerrillas, composed of the poor and homeless man among them, there was a born leader, guinevere.When they both by the ferocity of the invasion of Saxony people, to the final victory of the fighting, the two former rivals fighting alliance.The two leaders know each other in the war.Arthur finally succeeded in creating a kingdom of Great Britain, creating the history of the British, and eventually became the queen guinevere.

⑹ 电影《亚瑟王》的英文观后感，500字左右，不要复制的，自己写的，加分

Written by David Franzoni (Gladiator) and directed by Antoine Fuqua (Training Day), this film abandons all premonitions of what Arthur was and what he is in all our memories. They do keep some of the same, more recognizable, legends of the king. The Round Table makes an appearance but is not nearly held with as high regard as in previous legends. Also, Excalibur still sits on the hip of Arthur. But there's a different twist here. Where in other legends, Arthur was the son of a poor man who pulled the sword Excalibur from its stone, therefore establishing Divine Right for King of England; here Excalibur is his father's sword. His father is killed in battle and the young Arthur pulls the sword from his father's dead body and carries the sword since. Fuqua decides to use the same imagery as if Arthur was pulling the sword out of a stone but just the idea that Excalibur was pulled from his father's body and he has carried it ever since, establishes a little more depth to the story. And that's where most of the similarities stop. This story is based on historical finds that have been discovered recently that have not been established in other Arthurian literature or film works. Arthur is a Roman that has to serve out his ty to the Roman Empire until he realizes he is fighting for a Rome that is too idealistic to exist. Lancelot is an amazingly gifted warrior who was recruited from a young age to join the conquering Roman army to serve for 15 years. He has more of a friendship with Arthur than a king/knight relationship. Guinevere is not a princess from the neighboring France but an English born slave who is discovered and rescued by Arthur's knights. And Merlin normally considered the lovable magician is more of a rebel ghost who leads a rag tag group of English fighting the Roman Empire. So no, this is not your typical 'Arthur' movie.

But what truly surprised me were not the entirely new interpretations but how well every aspect of the film was done. The cinematography was unbelievable. Most of the shots look like they could have been taken start from artist renderings of Arthurian literature. Breathtaking establishing shots of the snowy English landscape transport you back into 400 AD where nature was virtually untouched and made you wish you could visit this country on holiday. The script for the film was done very well also. There weren't those blockbuster, crappy lines that one would expect from a Bruckheimer film. There wasn't even the one liner, 'Braveheart-like' war anthem when going into battle but a very stirring speech from Clive Owen (Arthur) that made you think 'They better kick some Saxon ass.' And it was funny. Not in the modern way either but they took humor and situations from that era and made it funny to today's audience, a true accomplishment.

But there are two things that make a blockbuster, period piece like this work…the battle scenes and the acting. First off, the acting was very impressive. Fuqua casted relatively unknown actors, besides Owen and Keira Knightly, to play the other pivotal parts in the film. None of the performances seemed forced and all appear to become their characters which was probably easier because they did not have to play the well known characters. These were all new interpretations of Arthur and his knights, allowing them to play the characters as they see fit. Who was impressive though was Knightly. Although I am a fan, I was even more impressed with the way she handled the role of Guinevere. Guinevere is no longer a princess who watches from the background but a warrior of Merlin who contributes greatly to the battles. Not many young, very young (19), actress today can pull off a role where you have to be a gorgeous potential Queen one minute and then a brutal warrior the next. And it was these battle scenes that made the film stand out just that much more. You have to appreciate it when directors and writers try to find new and innovative ways to have a battle scene that isn't two giant armies running at one another, swinging large weapons. 'Arthur' is one of those movies that made you believe these were how battles of that time should have been fought. And they were fun to watch.

All in all, 'King Arthur' amazed me. Very rarely to I walk into a film with such high expectations that they would never be filled. Yea, 'Arthur' surpassed everything I ever imagined.

⑺ 亚瑟王传奇读后感 普通一点 最好英文

The most famous works of life for the epic legend of "The Death of King Arthur," a comprehensive book contains the legendary King Arthur's round table knights search for the Holy Grail story and the heroic feat. Thirteen years in the Ming Hidemune formal closure of Korinomiyatsuko Knight (now Council).

It is now generally agreed that he and historical airborne Warwick County, lord of the same name are the same person, who is also a glimpse of tomorrow Yingzong thirteen years as a Warwick County members, if the two really the same person, then this were later charged with rape, robbery and attempted murder. In other words he was twenty years out of the prison to complete the process of compilation, "The Death of King Arthur," this feature-length masterpiece of.

"The Death of King Arthur," modeled on the French classics, plus the author's fictional creation of a lot of content and hybridity of some other material for the future generally agree that the book is the most complete description of the literary works of Arthurian legend . At the same time, he, too, the development of English prose narrative epic has made immortal contributions.
我在感受到一生中最有名的着作为史诗式传奇《亚瑟王之死》，书中全面收录了亚瑟王圆桌骑士们的传奇故事和追寻圣杯的英雄壮举。于明英宗正统十三年受封为郡领骑士（即现在的议员）。

现在人们普遍认同他与历史机载的同名沃尔威克郡领主是同一人，后者也是于明英宗十三年受封为沃尔威克郡议员的，如果二者真是同一人，那么此人后来被控强奸、抢劫和杀人未遂罪。也就是说他是在二十年出入于监狱的过程中编纂完成《亚瑟王之死》这部鸿篇巨着的。

《亚瑟王之死》以法国古书作为蓝本，加上了作者的很多虚构的创作内容，并杂糅了一些其他方面的素材，后世普遍认同此书为最完整地描述亚瑟王传奇的文学作品。同时，他也对英国散文叙事史诗的发展做出了不朽的贡献。

⑻ 如何评价电影《亚瑟王：圆桌骑士》

电影《亚瑟王：圆桌骑士》：客观评价

其实这可能是一个中古世纪的传说。

亚瑟王传说，是西元十二世纪，由遍历欧洲的吟游诗人开始传颂的。公认的集大成作品为15世纪左右的《亚瑟王之死》。
曾经统治英国的凯尔特民族在西元一世纪的时候被罗马帝国所统治，历经六世纪以后，日耳曼民族相继入侵，其势力渐趋衰微，终于被迫让出英国王位。传说中，亚瑟就是在日耳曼民族入侵的这段时期里面，以凯尔特人的英雄身份登场。他率领各部落在名为巴顿山之役的交战中一举击溃属于日耳曼民族一支的萨克森人，被视为中世纪英国着名的传奇人物。 但是，亚瑟的形象却随着传说故事的演进而不断地变化，最后演变成为统治不列颠之王，成为将兰斯洛特、崔斯坦等传说中的骑士收于麾下的“圆桌骑士团”的首领，拥有至高荣誉的英雄。
王者之剑（Excalibur）与石中剑（The Sword in the Stone）是亚瑟王至尊的王权象征，佩带着这把具有精灵魔力的王者之剑，令众骑士俯首称臣，不仅确立他自己的王位，也在众多的战役之中凯旋。

亚瑟王的佩剑——王者之剑（Excalibur），又译为断钢剑、斩铁剑、湖中剑、誓约胜利之剑。值得注意的是有许多较不专业的译文将此剑时译之为石中剑，这是不正确的。
石中剑（The Sword in the Stone)，亚瑟拔出的选王之剑。一说其为Excalibur的原型Caliburn。《不列颠诸王史》关于Caliburn的记载有亚瑟王用此剑一战杀掉攻击他的470名萨克逊士兵。
王者之剑是在亚瑟王传说中所登场的魔法圣剑，可以称得上是后世骑士文学中，英雄多半配持着名宝剑传统的滥觞。
在亚瑟王传说中，拔出石中剑、登基为王的亚瑟在与King Pellinore交锋时折断了石中剑，此役起因是亚瑟在一座城堡拜访时，城堡主人Annoure看到向城堡走来的Sir Pellinore，请求亚瑟王给予保护。实际上Sir Pellinore也是受到Annoure戏弄，前来与亚瑟王交锋。这次战斗被认为是违反骑士道的，成为石中剑断裂的原因。后来他在梅林的指引下，从湖中女士的手中得到了王者之剑。王者之剑在精灵国度阿瓦隆所打造，剑锷由黄金所铸、剑柄上镶有宝石，并因其锋刃削铁如泥，故湖中女士以Excalibur（即古塞尔特语中“断钢”之意）命名之。梅林此时则告诫亚瑟：“王者之剑虽强大，但其剑鞘却较其剑更为贵重。配戴王者之剑的剑鞘者将永不流血，你决不可遗失了它。” 但后来亚瑟王还是遗失了剑鞘，也因此他虽拥有削铁如泥的宝剑，最后仍为叛徒骑士Mordred所杀。而王者之剑最后则在亚瑟王的嘱咐下，由Sir Bedivere投回湖中，与亚瑟王一齐回到精灵国度阿瓦隆去。

时至今日，“圆桌骑士”已不再仅仅是一个历史名词，而成为“英勇”、“忠诚”和“信任”的代名词。这群骑士们的故事，以成传奇。

从古至今，不同版本的故事描述了不同数量的圆桌骑士，从12到150不等。最早写到温切斯特圆桌的是维斯（Wace），他在不列颠传说(Roman de Brut，1270) 列出了25位骑士的名字。
综合所有资料来看，圆桌骑士中得到最多公认也是最为着名的有以下几位：
兰斯洛特 Sir Lancelot 圆桌武士中无可争议的第一勇者，因传说其是被湖中仙女养大，被称为“湖上骑士”。他温文尔雅，乐于助人，却又英勇善战，大公无私。
高纹 Sir Gawain 实力堪于兰斯洛匹敌的骑士。他不仅武艺高超，战功显赫，而且身材高大，外形俊朗。传说他就是“白马王子”一词的来源。
凯 Sir Kay 亚瑟王从小被寄养的地方的主爱克伯公爵的儿子，被亚瑟王称为“哥哥”。是一位勇敢的热血少年。
巴林 Sir Balin 当时罕见的双手持剑骑士，头脑冷静，是一位智勇双全的统帅型人物。
帕西法尔 Sir Parcivale 亚瑟王的贴身骑士，后来圣杯骑士团的创始人。

当时圆桌武士中也存在类似于军规的约定，英国学者托马斯·马洛礼（Sir Thomas Malory，1405-1471）经过考证，将其归结为以下6条：
To never do outrage nor murder.
Always to flee treason.
To by no means be cruel but to give mercy unto him who asks for mercy.
To always do ladies, gentlewomen and widows succor.
To never force ladies, gentlewomen or widows.
Not to take up battles in wrongful quarrels.
永不暴怒和谋杀。
永不背叛。
永不残忍，给予求降者以宽恕。
总是给予女士以援助。
永不胁迫女士。
永不因争吵而卷入战斗

⑼ 亚瑟王 英语影评

Rule your fate.

It’s 300 A.D. and the Sarmatians to the east of Britain are all that’s left of a warring cavalry. So impressed with their agility and prowess at battle, the Romans decide to spare them their lives in return for just one little favor. All their young sons and their son’s sons are taken from their families and forced to serve as knights for Rome for 15 years each. Of course, they may return at the end of their service to Rome, unless they happen to die in battle, which will most likely be the horrible outcome.

It is into this dreary and sad history we are introced as Lancelot (Loan Gruffudd) is shipped off from his village as a pre-teen boy knowing full well he will never see his family again. It is a rough life. A life or death struggle just to make it through each 24 hour period.

As the dawn of his 15 year servitude crests, we are forced to engage with Lancelot in his final bloody battle before his freedom papers are given him, and he may return home a free man. Miraculously, Lancelot and his forged family of knights have survived this tour of ty to Rome! They have lived and died along side one another in these years under Roman Christian rule. There are but these brave left: Galahad (Hugh Dancy), Dagonet (Ray Stevenson), hawk-loving Tristan (Mads Mikkelsen) — and Arthur (Clive Owen), to whom they have all have pledged their iron-clad allegiance.

It is with high hopes they travel to meet with the Pope’s advocate to accept their papers to travel through Roman Britain unharmed under the protection of His Grace. Unfortunately for them, the home office in Italy has one more campaign for them to run, and if they are successful (which means if they don’t die while carrying it out) then, and only then, will they finally be allowed to quench their thirst for freedom.

Arthur, who had a Roman father and British mother, is an idealistic Christian soldier who truly believes God has sent him into this world to protect and win in Roman battles. He finds through the course of this final campaign, that Rome is not the place of equality and freedom his most beloved father had imbibed within him. The realm he so honorably served and protected for these past grueling years in fact no longer exists. The film traces Arthur’s evolution from idealistic dreamer to practical hero.

We do get a glimpse of the famous Round Table within the walls of the British castle/fortress to which Arthur refers is round “..for men to be men they must all be as equal” showing no head at this table, but an equal place for all. He also prays in earnest to God to have his life the sacrificed rather than any of his men, so that they would be able to return to their homes and families.

Lancelot, his most trusted friend, overhears this plea and asks why he beseeches this 'God' and not confide in him instead. Arthur responds that it is his faith that protects him. Lancelot responds by saying he trusts no man on his knees. Arthur shows true humility and says perhaps his prayers will put an end to this war. Being the realist he is, Lancelot sadly states there will always be battles in this world.

These knights willingly go off upon this one last mission, not because of their allegiance to Rome, but because of their respect and honor to Arthur. It is here that the sacrifice of faith and friendship is demonstrated in these brave men. Into the grip of the Saxons who have pillaged, raped and murdered their way across Britain they ride to rescue a Roman royal family and bring safely back the son, Arious, to the safe haven of the Roman Pope. They are ambushed in the forest by a fierce warrior tribe of Woads led by a mystical Merlin, but much to their surprise, are spared their lives.

Arthur and his men find the servants being flogged, beaten and tortured in a ngeon at the home of the Roman official he has been charged to rescue and is appalled this is being done in the name of Christianity. It proves more than just the honorable thing to do now, but the real Christian thing to do is save his British countrymen from the very rulers they have placed their faith in to protect them. Arthur also frees and falls in love with a beautiful, confident Woad princess, Guinevere (Keira Knightley). In this telling, Arthur and Guinevere are true loves and Lancelot, though smitten with Guinevere, never makes any advance towards her.

The Saxon army is headed by the ruthless warrior king Cerdic (Stellan Skrsgard) who will stop at nothing in his rampage of killing and burning to eventually meet and defeat Arthur and his knights. The scene where the seven knights aided by Guinevere’s expert archery, face down a whole battalion of 500 Saxon’s on a frozen river bed, is well worth the price of admission.

We are shown the 'real' account of Excalibur and how this sword of renown was actually pulled from the burial mound of his father by Arthur as a young boy, to be used later in his soldiering life to avenge the death of his mother.

This is no fairy tale account of King Arthur, but an attempt at realism — probably more like the rugged lives actually lived back in this ancient time. Although the writers did take many liberties with the classic legend, who King Arthur really was is so clouded by now, who is to say this account is not more closely woven to reality.

LANGUAGE, SEX AND VIOLENCE: The battle sequences are vividly graphic and lengthy, therefore I would not suggest this film for children under 13. There was some use of medieval swearing, but it seemed appropriate for the movie’s theme of reality. The film included a scene where rape was inferred, but nothing actually seen. There is also a sex scene between Arthur and Guinevere — sadly, just an act of lust and not the true love for which the story really called.

Over the course of its blood thirsty battles and through to its conclusion, this film provides a somber look at how Christian ideals can be abused — crushing and breaking innocent lives in the process. As history has often proved, it takes but one brave and committed human being to change the course of the times and bring relief to those who are harshly oppressed.

In the end, Arthur acknowledges that his best friend Lancelot gave his life for the freedom of others. He decrees that “deeds in themselves are for nothing except they be lead by a higher power.” Many have given their lives throughout human history for a better existence for all. As Christians we are finely tuned to the sacrificial death of our Savior, Jesus, for the sins of all mankind. How relevant the truth that there is no greater love than a man who gives his life freely for the sake of his friend’s. Through to the end Arthur never gave up his belief in God, even when other’s questioned, Arthur’s faith remained strong and true. I found this the best, most profound example over all.

⑽ 求一篇有关亚瑟王传说的英文演讲稿，3-5钟左右，要英汉对照的

简单完整点就可以了：

A Legendary King

The story of King Arthur is one that has been told for hundreds of years. There have been poems, books and even films made of his life, all of them telling the story a little differently.

The basic story is this. There was a sword stuck in a stone. The legend said that whoever could remove the sword would become King of England and save the country. Many brave knights tried to pull the sword out, but they all failed. One day, a young boy called Arthur was walking past the stone. He didn't know it, but he was in fact the son of an old king. He pulled the sword out of the stone and became the new King of England.

The stories of Arthur as King are tales of bravery and nobility. His closest advisor was Merlin, a powerful wizard. Arthur lived in a castle called Camelot with his beautiful wife, Guinevere. In the castle he had a round table, where he sat with his knights. It was round so that there was no one at the head of the table (which is where the most important person would usually sit) and Arthur and his knights were all equal.

Arthur, with his famous magical sword Excalibur, and his closest knights Sir Lancelot and Sir Galahad, fought against the forces of evil in England. These were led by Arthur's half-sister, Morgan, who was a witch. After many battles, there was only one left to fight. Arthur and his knights finally won the battle against Morgan's army, and England was safe! However, Arthur had been hurt, and was dying. He threw his sword into a lake, where the magical Lady of the Lake could look after it, and then he died. He was buried in Avalon, in the south-west of England. According to the legend, Arthur will rise again to save England if it is ever in danger in the future.

But did Arthur really exist? Some say he was a Roman, others say a Briton fighting the invading Saxons, but there is no proof of his existence. But perhaps this doesn't matter. The story of a great, noble and brave king, who died to save his country, is one that people of all generations find fascinating, even today.

一个具有传奇色彩的国王

国王亚瑟的故事讲述的是距今几百年前的事。他的生平曾以诗歌、书籍以及电影的方式流传，而这些讲述的故事情节都有所不同。

故事大体上是这样的。有一把钉在石头中的剑。传说能将那把剑拔出的人将成为英格兰之王并拯救世界。许多勇敢的骑士都试图拔出这把剑，却都失败了。有一天，有一个名叫亚瑟的小男孩路过这石头。他拔出了这把剑成为英格兰之王。

故事讲述了亚瑟作为国王多么的英勇与高贵。他亲密的助手梅林是个强大的巫师。亚瑟与他美丽的妻子桂乃芬居住在一个叫做康洛特（灿烂繁华境界）的城堡。在那里，他为他的骑士们摆设了一张圆桌。它之所以是圆的因为可以不分上座（那是通常重要的人坐的位置），亚瑟与他的骑士是平起平坐的。

亚瑟佩戴着他那着名的魔剑斩钢剑，与他亲密骑士兰斯洛特爵士与加拉哈骑士一起与英格兰的罪恶势力作斗争。那些罪恶势力是他作巫师的同母异父的姐姐玛高丝为首的。在许多的战斗后的最终战中，亚瑟与他的骑士们打败了玛高丝的军队拯救了英格兰！但是亚瑟却被箭射中生命垂危。他把剑投入湖中让湖中的女仙看管后就死了。他被葬在阿瓦隆，在英格兰的西南角。据传说，亚瑟将复活保护在未来危机中的英格兰。

但亚瑟是否真的存在？有些人说他是罗马人，有些人则说他是抵御萨克森人的不列颠本土人，但他的存在实在没有确凿的证据。但那没有多大的关系。这个关于高贵伟大以死拯救他的国家的国王的伟大故事，使各个时代的人都为之着迷，直到今日。

英文出处：