论文英语电影

‘壹’ 求英语电影论文

《Alexander》about it. ——《亚历山大大帝》观后感~

I am a student, study more onerous task to all immersed in a pile, thick book of other aspects of knowledge about nature also less. In order to broaden their horizons, when choosing courses, I usually choose some human science classes. Remember when a friend gave high school had a Greek mythology to me, that is, from the book, I see a god of the mind and I've also is the traditional Chinese religion in the image of god is completely different. Greek mythology of the gods of the people who have thoughts, feelings, and the joy of the people, sadness, jealous, have fear. But god is the Oriental religions in, or even omnipotent, is ordinary mortals cannot be achieved. But because those books and the names of the gods and long, sometimes make me confused, I eventually failed to read the book. Myth, of course, is part of the culture of the classical Greek, in order to understand with many Greek mythology, when he saw the ancient Greek culture, when elective without hesitation, I chose. Fortunately, I choose. Through a study of the semester, although no Greek culture and in-depth understanding of ancient Greece, but the experienced periods have probably know for certain period of development, the typical of the political system, cultural phenomenon also have certain knowledge, I think is good harvest. Of course, the teacher said to the final paper to write, I still feel a bit silly, I don't know what good, because although much knowledge of ancient Greece, but to really understand some of the problems one write an essay, I think my knowledge is not enough. Just recently saw "Alexander of Alexander's life", interest, but to know before Alexander, so you have to find some information, and some of the facts is mentioned below from these materials, not do annotation.
Video introction
Alexander the great was about the history of the world's first emperor Alexander conquered Eurasian of life. Alexander BC, in Macedonian king is 3.56 Philip ii, once studied Aristotle, 19 years old father was assassinated succession to the throne. He first, then pacify defeated the Persian empire, began 22,000 miles of conquest. 25 years old, Alexander had established including the Nile valley, dry peninsula and the Ins civilization across Europe in Asia, but the Alexander under age 33 because inexplicable disease die suddenly.
In this film, Alexander the great friend (Anthony Hopkins ptolemaic general) through memory, the emperor's will as life. Forty years ago, Hollywood has taken Alexander, but only about his hero. The new version, full of adventure and dream from the childhood, thrust his parents fight, then the sad for him by Aristotle and mapping lesson, graally to his invicible paving the way to conquer. This is the life of the vivid characterization.
The director of Alexander oliver stone said: "this is probably the biggest challenges in my life, hope can make it much objective." In order to do this, stone is hard. Rafer specially invited professor of the university of Oxford robin Ryan fox as the historical consultant. The fox is research of Alexander the great expert, once wrote biographies of Alexander, sales of more than 100 million copies. He accepted the invitation gladly, but a condition, is to them in the emperor's elite cavalry, and must stand in the front of the team, he "fight" for Alexander dream.
Stone has invited the ancient linguists, tries to make some of the lines to real effect. Language Fox watched the movie said after school and historical scholars should get there watching for discussion.
However, if the movie history book, it obviously lost as the value of the movie. "Alexander" in the context of history, the plot details on again. Films, Alexander's father told him: a woman more dangerous than men, as the king had hurt his lover, Mother kept his place before him, said his father. Without these details on the history, but the parents struggle was mentioned. Alexander, such as wedding night, the bride almost killed him, although not in the historical lee, but the bride was defeated by Alexander, daughter of darius, the plot and have confidence. Therefore, the writer's creation that is reasonable, no violation of history.In addition, the recent history of the new viewpoint about Alexander historiography, more and more absorbed some characters, appear very full.
A pursuit of dreams
Above has been mentioned in the film, and the understanding of Alexander before, so he is the first impression from the movie, here is to put the matter what facts. Admittedly, the film Alexander some arbitrary, even some cold, but sometimes think conversely, if no such a domineering, pride and resolute, he can become a history of Chinese strategists hoyywood hills? However, I want to discuss and not his military command art, but his pursuit of dreams and in the process which reflects personality, it is exciting and amazing. If someone was born, this man is the conqueror Alexander. As a great soldier son, Alexander had been instilled many heroism and high adventure stories. He can reel off in the early lead, read Homer in the shelter of personality and lyrics. Whether in the house or in the battlefield, he had a pillow YiLiYaTe "with him to sleep. He led his Greek soldiers and defeated the Persian empire, strong and continue to crusade. Along the way, he and his army met with human body is similar, but what we know, hair, it is a monkey. They rode on large and those of the east, the elephant who had never seen defeated the monster. Of course, though, Alexander the great personality charm, many of his soldiers to fight for Alexander has faith, but for a long time, the journey of hard driving, the warriors who still alive and tired, they obviously very to return to his country and so on the roster appeared, the army also appeared a mutiny. One section, I is very impressive, when he determined to continue to advance in India, unwilling to part soldiers, one of the important general said a touching, they finally wish is only in them to the soldiers who died superempirical essence and meet them before the meeting, the wife and children. Alexander said: "yes, you're right, I, Ross, negligence. Should I send you back as soon as possible, all pensions from me to send, respected and wealthy, love, in the rest of you will be his wife and son of a hero, finally died peacefully. But your dreams, Ross, you, the simple, early in your child's life with Persia, with gold and silver in your pockets stuffed with you when you love, because it can destroy everything in the life of a man!" , kelat rose that touching words some long, here I will not lead to, but when I'm hearing his words, I was really touched by it and feel a mortal ordinary and true feelings, in my opinion, that he was not too. Then, Alexander the retort that enthusiasm, yes, Alexander and their pursuit of something different, he pursues the sun rays, the pursuit of great, so the life of ease, money and enjoy attractive for him, he defeated the Persian empire, Babylon the great wealth, costly court life and can't baffel him to continue the expedition.
Just after the movie's feelings, then some literatures on Alexander's expedition, some of the objective a detailed analysis. According to the data, Alexander expedition, he himself has said the Persian, and had ravaged sanctuary in Greece was assassinated Philip ii, the purpose is the expedition, revenge against the Persian stronger. But the specific analysis, find the reason for the expedition is just an excuse. Firstly, the assassination of the killer waves Philip ii, paulson and no relationship with the Persian empire. O Nebuchadnezzar, paulson wave is a young aristocrat, he and Philip ii, the generals have personal in Dallas. Whatever wave, is of Nebuchadnezzar's, but he SiYuan what action, really have no direct connection with the Persian empire. Alexander said he was assassinated in Persia, Philip ii, historical records on no. Secondly, from the assassination of Nebuchadnezzar, wave, paulson to Philip ii, so the action in advance of horses prepared assassination scene, it shows that he really otherwise conspiracy. Third, revenge is only according to Greek long-standing extremely extensive mental state, as to stimulate the greeks into the slogan of the Persian.
Anyway, I think it is worth affirmation, Alexander the great dream, in order to realize its can not wealth, enjoy thier rance and courage to explore the unknown.
2 Tim HeFei and about Alexander, RON
Alexander the great films, especially sexual orientation private life a lot dispute. In fact, he HeFei and ask the relationship, and I was at the movies process has been very puzzled, why history so great a character is gay? Believe that many people have the same doubts.However, when I accidentally see teacher site of excellent assignments exploring ancient Greek young titled "love", I feel like a life. For the love of the young this phenomenon from different aspects. First is the ancient greeks aesthetic idea. Ancient Greece is extremely attractive appearance and the worship of strong and handsome figure, in this respect, they don't care, as long as the male sex "golden hair, jiongjiongweishen eyes, ruddy complexion, strong muscle, broad shoulders." He must be able to attract others' eyes and love. Beautiful young completely meet greeks aesthetic standards and, in some cases, the young beauty of man can be less attractive girl. Secondly, the ancient Greek culture condition is the root of young love. The ancient culture and modern culture and the fundamental difference between the ancients to men, women, children in the man's eyes is only the mother and the family business managers. The ancient greeks regarded the spirit of man is the center of activities, they think that the girl was not what ecation, this kind of situation is caused by a woman because ecation condition, the cultural resources, and the spirit world of ancient Greek men spirit grades. This kind of social status can appear a situation: men and women together only flirting with youth, and can be found in the heart. They are likely to rationally between the dialogue lies not only in the young, beautiful, because they have more abundant knowledge and talent. Therefore, in ancient Greece appeared a modern difficult to understand customs: every man have attracted a boy or a young man, and in close daily life as his tutor, guardian and friends, also encouraged him to study all noble character. If any man have deceived than his little boy, will be considered not perform ties of a man, No one can get to a young man of friendship is a shame for. This kind of social and cultural customs in promoting cultural and ideological progress in a little deeper, to help build social moral standards have contribution. We can not surprised to find that most firmly hold the view that homosexuality is the most important and the most influential cultural elite of ancient Greece. At this point, even the spirit of love, Socrates also no exception.
In addition, a professor of the university of Oxford robin Ryan fox in the privacy of Alexander is explained. He said, Alexander has three wives, and his mistress, four grow up together, carry the HeFei partners have homosexual relations, and the one who Persian royal eunuch very close. The fox said, many of these ancient historians recorded the plot, compared with these records could be understatement. While these sparked controversy, because of different age has different view. Ancient Greece, polygamy and homosexuality is normal, Christian Europe, strict monogamy was established, homosexuality was considered evil, so, if we use today's morality to request more than 2,000 years ago, the ancients are serious distortion.
Want to use words to summarize the feeling after see: "bravely to pursue their dreams!"

‘贰’ 求英语影视欣赏方面的论文

选一个角度，是些黑人人权、人性的，人性的污点； 写女权、女性地位的，飘和desperate housewife,sex and city的对比；写政治题材的，就很多了。24， west wing；写科幻的、外星人、阴谋论的，x-file ,lost，fringe.

‘叁’ 一篇关于英语原版电影的论文

L：Are you hiding from me?
T：No.I just... I...No. No. I was just, um...I didn't want to scare you.
L：If you don't mind my asking...what are you?
T：Well, I'm a... [sighs]Well, I'm a faun. And what about you? You must be some kind of beardless dwarf?
L：I'm not a dwarf! I'm a girl! And, actually, I'm tallest in my class.
T：You mean to say that you're a Daughter of Eve?
L：Well, my mum's name is Helen.
T：Yes, but you are in fact human.
L：Yes, of course.
T：What are you doing here?
L：Well, I was hiding in the wardrobe in the spare room, and...
T：Spare room? Is that in Narnia?
L：Narnia? What's that?
T：[chuckling] Well, dear girl, you're in it. every stick and stone you see. Please allow me to introce myself.My name is Tumnus.
L：Pleased to meet you, Mr. Tumnus. I'm Lucy Pevensie.
T：- Oh, you shake it.- Uh... Why?
L：I... I don't know. People do it when they meet each other.
T：Well, then, Lucy Pevensie from the shining city of War Drobe. How would it be if you came and had tea with me?
L：Well, thank you very much, but I probably should be getting back.
T：It's only just around the corner.And there'll be a glorious fire

‘肆’ 跪求！！要写英语毕业论文，想写字幕翻译分析的，有什么电影电视剧介绍最好是电影，电视剧的就别那么长

觉得可以写一些中国特色的东西，不限于把外文翻译成中文，可以把中国的电影翻译成外文 ，比如一些经典的老电影什么的，貌似现在还没有英文翻译，比如英雄儿女等。

‘伍’ 我要写8000字的英语论文 是找一部文学作品写好呢还是找一部电影写好 能不能给我推荐一下文学作品或电影名

1.苏东坡的文学背景和他的赋
SU TUNG-PO’S LITERARY BACKGROUND AND HIS PROSE-POETRY by Qian Zhongshu

(Primarily written as a foreword to “Su Tung-Po’s Prose-poems” translated into English With Notes and Commentaries by C. D. Le Gros Clark, this is published here by kind permission of Mr. Le Gros Clark. Those who are interested in textual criticism may consult Mr. Wu Shih-ch’ang’s review in Chinese which appeared in The Crescent Monthly, Vol. IV, No. 3. –Ed.)

Of the Sung dynasty, it may be said, as Hazlitt said of himself, that it is nothing if not critical. The Chinese people dropped something of their usual wise passiveness ring the Sung dynasty, and “pondered, searched, probed, vexed, and criticized”. This intellectual activity, however, is not to be compared with that of the Pre-Chin period, the heyday of Chinese philosophy. The men of the Sung dynasty were inquisitive rather than speculative, filled more with a sense of curiosity than with a sense of mystery. Hence, there is no sweep, no daring, no roominess or margin in their intellectualism. A prosaic and stuffy thing theirs is, on the whole. This critical spirit revealed itself in many directions, particularly in the full flourish of literary criticism and the rise of the tao-hsüeh （道学）, that mélange altere of metaphysics, psychology, ethics and casuistry.

Literary criticism in China is an unly belated art. Apart from a handful of obiter dicta scattered here and there, Liu Hsieh’s Literary Mind （刘勰文心雕龙） and Lo Chi’s A Prose-poem on Literature （陆机文赋） are the critical writings that count up to the Sung dynasty. There is Chung Yung’s Classification of Poets (钟嵘诗品) of course. But Chung Yung is a literary genealogist rather than a critic, and his method of simply dividing poets into sheep and goats and dispensing praise or dispraise where he thought e, is the reverse of critical, let alone his fanciful attempts to trace literary parentages(1). Ssu-Kung Tu’s Characterisations of Poetry (司空图诗品) is a different matter(2). Ssu-Kung Tu seeks to convey purely with imagery the impressions registered by a sensitive mind of twenty four different kinds of poetry: “pure, ornate, grotesque,” etc. His is perhaps the earliest piece of “impressionistic” or “creative criticism” ever written if any language, so quietly ecstatic and so autonomous and self-sufficient, as it were, in its being but it fails on that very account to become sober and proper criticism. It is not until the Sung dynasty that criticism begins to be practiced in earnest. Numerous “causeries on poetry” （诗话）are written and principles of literature are canvassed by way of commentaries on indivial poets. Henceforth, causeries on poetry become established as the vehicle for Chinese criticism. One must note in passing that there do not appear professional critics with the rise of criticism. In those good old days of China, criticism is always the prerogative of artists themselves. The division of labour between critics and artists in the West is something that the old Chinese literati would scoff at. The criticism of Sung dynasty, like all Chinese criticismsbefore the “New Literature Movement” with the possible exception of Hsieh’s Literary Mind, is apt to fasten upon particulars and be given too much to the study of best words in best places. But it is symptomatic of the critical spirit, and there is an end of it.

The Chinese common reader often regards the men of the Sung dynasty as prigs. Their high seriousness and intellectual and moral squeamishness are at once irritating and amusing to the ordinary easy-going Chinese temperament. There is something paralyzing and devitalizing in their wire-drawn casuistry which inces hostile critics to attribute the collapse of the Sung dynasty to its philosophers. There is also a disingenuousness in their attempts at what may be called for want of a better name, philosophical masquerade: to dress up Taoism of Buddhism as orthodox Confucianism. One need but look into Sketches in a Villa（阅微草堂笔记）and Causeries on Poetry in a Garden（随园诗话） to see what a good laugh these two coxcombs of letters, Chi Yuen （纪昀） and Yuan Mei （袁枚） have had at the expense of the Sung philosophers and critics respectively. Nevertheless ofe is compelled to admit that the Sung philosophers are unequalled in the study of mental chemistry. Never has human nature been subject to a more rigorous scrutiny before or since in the history of Chinese thought. For what strikes one most in the tao-hsüeh is the emphasis on self-knowledge. This constant preying upon itself of the mind is quite in the spirit of the age. The Sung philosophers are morbidly introspective, always feeling their moral pulses and floundering in their own streams of consciousness. To them, their mind verily “ a kingdom is”. They analyse and pulverize human nature. But for that moral bias which Nietzsche thinks to be also the bane of German philosophy, their vivisection of human soul would have contributed a good deal to what Santayna calls literary psychology.

The poetry of the sung dynasty is also a case in point. It is a critical commonplace that the Sung poetry furnishes a striking contract to the T’ang poetry. Chinese poetry, hitherto ethereal and delicate, seems in the Sung dynasty to take on flesh and becomes a solid, full-blooded thing. It is more weighted with the burden of thought. Of course, it still looks light and slight enough by the side of Western poetry. But the lightness of the Sung poetry is that of an aeroplane describing graceful curves, and no longer that of a moth fluttering in the mellow twilight. In the Sung poetry one finds very little of that suggestiveness, that charm of a beautiful thing imperfectly beheld, which foreigners think characteristic of Chinese poetry in general. Instead, one meets with a great deal of naked thinking and outright speaking. It may be called “sentimental” in contradistinction to the T’ang poetry which is on the whole “naïve”, to adopt Schiller’s useful antithesis. The Sung poets, however, make up for their loss in lisping naivete and lyric glow by a finesse in feeling and observation. In their descriptive poetry, they have the knack of taking the thing to be described sur le vif: witness Lo Yu (陆游) and Yang Wan-li （杨万里）. They have also a better perception of the nuances of emotion than the T’ang poets, as can be seen particularly in their Ts’u （词）, a species of song for which the Sung dynasty is justly famous(3). Small wonder that they are deliberate artists, considering the fact that they all have been critics in the off hours of their inspiration. The most annoying thing about them is perhaps their erudition and allusiveness which makes the enjoyment of them to a large extent the luxury of the initiated even among the Chinese. （3000字）

还有一篇在玩偶之家的身份抗争（6000字）和一篇马丁路德金的《我有一个梦》文体分析（10000字）
如果需要就麻烦您告诉我您的邮箱，再给您发过去。
······································

说行天下 是非常不错的小说网站大全，你值得拥有。

‘陆’ 急求英美电影欣赏论文（英文的）

Men of Honor

《斯蒂文森小说精华》下卷收录《黑箭》及《绑架》，这两部长篇都是非常引人入胜的历史小说。在介绍二书各自的时代背景以前，不妨让我们先来鸟瞰一下英国历史，它的大脉络，那是很有趣的。

提起英国，人们只知道是个老牌帝国主义，十九世纪首先就是这匹恶狼闯进我们的家园。但是，在不列颠（联合王国除开北爱尔兰）那片土地（约略相当于我国湖南省）上，曾经多少次遭受外族血与火的蹂躏？多少次山河变色、国破家亡？一代又一代，有多少个入侵者、杀人凶犯，又有多少个英奸、卖国贼，最后都成了他们民族英雄和历史伟人，我们中有几位能够说了然于胸呢？一笔一笔血淋淋的陈年旧帐，整个的英国历史我们可以大体上概括为：三次种族大换血，三次沦为殖民地（即文化大换血或输血），三次开门揖盗，引狼入室，认贼作父——其中两回全国都成了我们中国的吴三桂。这就是一部英国史！

大约距今九千年以前，不列颠诸岛与欧洲大陆还是连成一体的，那里居住着中石器时代的地中海人和阿尔卑斯人。约五千年前，伊比利亚人自地中海地区西迁，是首批从大陆渡海过来的，征服了原有的居民。这次征服必定十分野蛮悲惨，使我们已经找不到任何中石器人的痕迹了。着名文化古迹索尔兹伯里平原上的怪石圈，就是伊比利亚人留下来的。是为第一次换血。

到了约两千五百年以前，有凯尔特人自今天德国南部一路砍杀过来，先后占领了今日法兰西、西班牙、葡萄牙、意大利等地，接着又越海占据了不列颠诸岛，残酷屠戮伊比利亚人。是为第二次换血。

自公元一世纪中叶，罗马帝国对不列颠进行了长达四百年的殖民统治。政府、法律和商业都使用拉丁语，只剩下乡下人才说凯尔特话。铺石的公路自此四通八达，繁荣城镇星罗棋布，罗马人还带来了基督教，其文化、习俗、生活用品也大量渗入，整个社会生活都罗马化了。直到五世纪初老家起火，他们才开始撤离。这是第一次被殖民地化。[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]

前门去狼，后门进虎。紧接着于五世纪中叶，原居住在西北欧的三个日耳曼野蛮部族——盎格鲁、撒克逊和朱特人横渡北海，所谓“条顿人的征服”，（严格地讲，可以说是四次引狼入室。因为罗马军团撤离以后，软弱的不列颠暴露于北方野蛮苏格兰人同皮克人的侵扰之下。据说首先是一位凯尔特部族领袖，主动邀请朱特人前来协办国防的；而朱特人见有隙可乘，后来才反客为主，并引发盎格鲁及撒克逊人也来大举入侵。）耗时一百五十年。秦始皇焚书坑儒？小菜一碟！日耳曼人把凯尔特整个一个民族的成年男子几乎打杀干净啦（第三次换血）！他们这些刽子手构成了今天英吉利民族的主体。自然，残留的妇孺免不了繁衍生息，于是一代又一代的混血种横空出世。

金庸历史小说非常有趣，其耐看不亚于斯蒂文森。然而，若按照小说中那些仁人志士伸张正义、替天行道的血性脾气，非得要报伊比利亚人同凯尔特人，还有中石器人的血海深仇，将那些屠夫的孽种——今日的英国人，杀个精光不可！

历三四百年七国并存（类春秋战国）的局面，迟到九世纪初，延伸至十一世纪初，日耳曼野蛮人终于从自身各个部族纷乱称雄之中名义上得到统一，演绎出英国统治世系的第一个朝代——撒克逊系。

就在撒克逊系统御国家的同时，九至十一世纪，来自北欧的维京海盗——其中主要是丹麦人，大规模入侵英国。他们除了在英格兰东北部建立“丹麦区”，进行直接赤裸裸的统治之外，以后又向南方扩张。到十一世纪上半叶，虽说不断受到盎格鲁撒克逊人的反抗，仍有三十年之久，整个英格兰都已置于了丹麦国王卡纽特统治之下 ——此三十年即英国朝廷的第二系，丹麦系。前后历三百年，语言、文化、司法、度量衡……无不受到深深的影响。屈辱的殖民地史，居然列入了国祚的正统。

十一世纪中叶卡纽特帝国瓦解以后，政权重归撒克逊人的手中，是谓西撒克逊系。但是新王爱德华之母却是个诺曼底人（所谓诺曼底人本来也不是诺曼底的人，而是原居住于北欧的诺曼人，于九世纪南徙至今法国西北部、由于他们到来才称做诺曼底的地方，安顿了下来。操法语，与法国同化了。当时受封于国王的公爵，其领地叫公国，伯爵的叫伯国。十世纪初建立了诺曼底公国，为法国封建诸侯中最强大的；名份上为法王属下，实际有相当的独立性），国王本人是个半撒克逊半诺曼底的杂种，他自幼在诺曼底长大，长期流亡于兹，三十八岁才回国。即位以后便大量起用诺曼底人，还跟其表弟诺曼底公爵结为联盟，以抗衡国内的贵族，并使法语成为社会上层主要的交流工具。可谓里通外国、引狼入室之先声。

一○六六年，那位表弟诺曼底公爵威廉，根据表哥生前有让他继位之愿望，率兵五千乘舰队入侵英国，打败并杀死了新王哈罗德。英国大主教于西敏寺为之加冕，凭着圣经将英格兰交付与之，不久他便携着一批归顺的大主教、王孙贵族，返回诺曼底去也。胜利的法国人几年以内不断焚毁村庄，杀戮平民，掠夺英国贵族的土地以犒赏亲属及随从，统治上层换成了诺曼人的天下，新贵族取代了盎格鲁撒克逊的老贵族，诺曼底——法兰西语和诺曼——法兰西法律成了英格兰宫廷、英格兰贵族的语言和法律。教会也由法国来的意大利籍大主教接管了。然而，正是这位建立了诺曼底王朝的外国殖民君主同他的世子（继位者）们，于司法制度、兴建教堂乃至形成上议院、文化……等等方面诸多建树，即是说从世俗（硬件）同灵魂（软件）两个方面，为社会公正奠定了基础，开创了不朽的盛世基业，很有一点汉武帝的气象哩！原先盎格鲁撒克逊时期每个人只有一个单名，现今这样名字后边尾以姓氏，也是模仿他们法国贵族来的，这便是第三次殖民地化。自此以后，再也没有外族跨海入侵、成立霸业的情事了。君主世袭制度也是从威廉肇始，故被英国人大捧特捧为“征服者威廉”，几乎被当成我们的尧舜禹汤（真是一群厚颜无耻的亡国奴）！[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]

说起尧舜禹汤，要提一下英国朝代递嬗的历史，那是迟到九世纪之初，自撒克逊国王埃格伯特开端的；较之我国西周共和，要晚上一千六百多年。一千二百年以来划为三个系、九代王朝，九朝当中还夹着一个共和政体。三系前边已经交代过了，第一代王朝便是这位威廉一世所建立。近一百年以后，安茹（法国地名）伯爵亨利二世（威廉一世的重外孙，又是一个外国人）跑到英国来，创建了安茹（又名金雀花）王朝——试设想一下，中国历史上若在北京建立一个约克（英地名）王朝或普瓦提埃（法地名）王朝，敝国上邦的文人们会不出来文饰一番，听由它赤裸裸洋名字刺激自己的自尊心吗？两朝共历三个半世纪之久，其中很长一段时间英国都是在法国国王的指挥棒下，让法国人或其后裔黄袍加身，君临英土。他们既是英国的一国之主，又在法国享有大片封地，作为法国藩镇，法王的附庸，其实心里只把英国当成一块殖民地，诺曼底才是他们的老巢，他们的根。一世以下有七位帝君，他们对英国只是遥领而已，大部分时间仍旧都呆在诺曼底的，其第六位在位十年，居留英国还不及一年哩。你看清兵入关，满人主宰天下以后，表现比他们还要好一些。尽管如此，英国人不去卧薪尝胆，不去做伯夷叔齐，偏还要把亨利二世这个法国拐子，也看作他们历史上最伟大的君王之一！直到十三世纪初法王将诺曼底收了回去，英国的君主这才慢慢地，开始一心一意作个名副其实的英国国王了。又过了将近两百年，朝廷重行回复到英国血统手中，开始了兰开斯特王朝。不过这一回殖民地亡国奴的滋味还要有得尝，又经历了大半个世纪，下一个约克王朝的第一任国王开始，才可以娶英国女子——而非法国女子，为王后；再又到建立都铎王朝的国王手上，英语才取代法语成为官方语言。到十八世纪的三十年代在法庭上才废止法语使用英语。

剩下来还有两次值得一提。第一回在一六八九年，中国的吴三桂刚刚于十年前闭上眼睛，英国大多数宗教徒出于强烈反对天主教国王掌政，不顾不久前荷兰海军驶入泰晤士河奇袭英皇家舰艇的国耻（1666年6月，荷兰海军迅雷不及掩耳冲入泰晤士河，炮毁英国舰只无数，王家船坞付诸一炬，尤为奇耻大辱者海军旗舰“皇家查尔斯号”竟被虏走。炮声隆隆，伦敦震撼，实实在在预演了一场珍珠港事变），请求国王的女儿玛丽同她的丈夫、荷兰统治者威廉（威廉不仅是国王的女婿，还是他的亲外甥）前来承继王位。于是女儿偕同女婿率军登陆英国，打得老豆跟老岳丈落荒而逃（当时玛丽的胞妹安，以及她的丹麦丈夫，倒向姐姐、姐夫一边，也背叛了老爹及泰山。后来安继威廉三世为女王，这个忤逆不孝的女人恶有善报，极富政声）。群臣请命：“玛丽女王，威廉摄政，如何？”“不干！”于是这位既有德国也有英国血统的荷兰杂种威廉三世，英国话都说不好的，堂而皇之地坐上了龙椅（玛丽为王后）。中国人要质问：伦理焉在，仁义何存？简直岂有此理！可是，沿袭至今虚君实相的民主政治体制——议会高于国王、平民院高于贵族院 ——正是此时确立，两党制格局也自兹形成；还有大败法王路易十四、成就英第一帝国等等功业。因此，英国人把这次不怎么流血的外戚入侵、大家都当亡国奴，十分自豪地称之为“光荣革命”，看得比中国人心目中的唐宗宋祖，还要高出许多头哩。

第二回是在二十五年以后，安女王仙逝无嗣，同样出于英国国教对天主教的排斥，遵照国会法案，举国迎接女王的表兄弟、德国番佬、汉诺威公爵乔治登基，称乔治一世。根本不会说英语，又在德国土生土长的他（其太子，后来继位的国王也一样），开始了史书上倒数第二个王朝，那又是一个以外国地名命名的王朝！此王朝繁演了一百多年，传到了维多利亚。哗，这位十八岁少女直到白发苍苍八十二岁老太太，金銮殿上龙椅一坐就是六十四年，比咱们康熙老皇帝还要长哇！可这个维多利亚不也是个杂种吗，原来她的母亲本是德意志一个小公国的寡妇，后来嫁到了英国王室。女王从小就在日耳曼人的教养下长大，母语说德语，英语一辈子也说得不地道。登基三年后又嫁给她所狂热崇拜的一位母系的表弟——不消说，那是个纯种日耳曼，狼子野心、非我族类无疑的喽！此后更加封亲王，倚之为左右手，批阅公文，干预朝政，（呜呼，大权旁落，一至于斯！）然而天哪，正是这一对野夫妇，文治武功，创造出英国历史上最辉煌的黄金时代！中国的中山路、中山堂、中山大、中山医科大……已经够多的啦，而以她维多利亚命名的，更遍及英、加、澳、亚、非诸多地域，还要多得多啊。英国人拿胜利、勇气、恒心、真理、母性、正义、科学与文艺、和平与进步……几乎所有想得到的颂辞，都奉献给了她，亲王也同样地世世代代倍受尊崇。你们瞧这个国民有多贱！其实，维多利亚的意义不仅限于英国。十八世纪，世界文明的重心在巴黎；十九世纪三十年代以后，即进入维多利亚时代，世界文明的重心到了伦敦。

以上这一类故事并不仅限于英国。我们知道古代日耳曼本是一个游牧民族，精壮男子去外边打仗，不断夺取新的土地，然后整个部落，男女老少，不断地易地迁居。他们极其重视荣誉，而这种荣誉是建立在比狠斗勇上边，认为掠夺、流血得来的财物，远比诚实劳动——流汗得来的光荣。所以打仗——掠夺，便成了生活的至高目的。为了抢劫不惜杀身成仁，舍生取义，血流成河，何等的悲壮！公元前一○二年，二十万条顿人于今法国马赛附近几乎全数被歼，死尸之多，居民不得不用白骨去砌葡萄园的藩篱。次年另一支日耳曼人在意大利北部牺牲更为惨烈，不单男人个个战死不屈，妇女们也成群先杀死自己的孩子，然后自刎。而欧洲人脉管中涌动着的，正是古罗马人（也是好战的种族）和古日耳曼人的血液！由此我们得知，如同汉民族这样死守着东亚一大片腹地，老子说“夫唯兵者不详之器”，墨子主张“非攻”，勤勤恳恳地从事农耕；三千年来各种民族成份无太大变动地延续了下来，虽足堪自豪，却并非世界人类史的唯一模式。

固然，王室皇族之间跨国互通嫁娶在欧洲的历史中据有特殊的地位，甚至曾经与民族国家之逐步形成同步进行，这一点本来同中国不大相同。即便是如此，从以上我们仍然可以得知，英国人是把宗教信仰、经济、政治的现实利益，以及实际政绩，看得高于抽象的民族感情的。所以像汉族这样，将对民族的忠贞当作超乎一切最高的价值标准，不惜掷头颅洒热血，赴汤蹈火；譬如从明末无数忠义之士壮烈殉国，清初到处反清复明，直闹到秋瑾，乃至孙中山还要靠黑社会排满起家，并不是人类文明史惟一的模式。

中国村只是地球上的一个角落，行善的人喜欢说“将心比心”，将心比心无疑是非常之好的；但是若认为邻村的善恶标准、价值取向，也应当同自己的一模一样，那便要谬误千里了。今天，跨在廿一世纪门槛上的我国青少年理应知己知彼，对这个多元的世界，对其他各个国家不同的历史，有更多的了解，具更博大的眼光，更宽阔的胸怀，以便当一个不至于丢人现眼的地球公民。爱国主义源于普遍的人性，民族沙文主义则要不得。

历史家皮名举有言“不学本国史不知道中国的伟大，不学西洋史不知道中国的落后”。信哉！

‘柒’ 英语论文题目：英语学习与电影的关系。帮忙想一下题目，谢谢，专业人士帮忙！

电影欣赏与英语学习，看电影学英语，美剧与英语学习，电影之于大学英语学习，
论英语原声电影在英语学习中的作用，从欣赏英语原版电影谈高中生的英语学习

‘捌’ 高分 英语论文 电影

来看看我们群主写的<傲慢与偏见>吧!!
http://group.qq.com/group_index.html?groupid=22493817

‘玖’ 哪些电影可以拿来写英语论文

《冰雪奇缘》、暮光之城、贫民窟的百万富翁。其实具体要看你写什么方向，如果翻译方向，任何一个国外的电影都可以用来分析。

‘拾’ 英语电影欣赏论文(中文的）一千五百字以上的

每周两部电影的生活过去了,选修课结课了,老师还不错,交一篇英文看后感就行,总结这一门课,确实看了不少电影,其中我比较喜欢的有<<兵临城下>>(神奇狙击手战争与爱情的交织)<<诺丁山>>(Notting Hill)(一个普通市民与好莱坞女明星的爱情故事）<<当幸福来敲门>>(我的论文就写的关于他的)<<海上钢琴师》（一个没上过岸，不懂乐谱却拥有非凡音乐才华的人的故事）《军火之王》（通过描写军火商反战）。

最后我写了一篇《当幸福来敲门》的看后感，Will Smith主演，由真人真事改编。全文如下，第一次写如此长的English，写完又打印出来。里面肯定还有一些错误，如果有人闲着无聊，可以溜几眼，或许对你日后学习英语的信心有帮助。

After seeing the film”The Pursuit Of Happiness”，I’m deeply involved in the thought of life．We live in a big world including the rich and the poor，the optimist and the pessimist．What about you? Do you feel fulfilled? Have you ever made a plan for the happy life? The film supplies us with a man answering them.

Many years ago, a view occupied me that life must be spent in enjoy. But now, especially from seeing the film, my thoughts are changed. Life is not only to enjoy what you have, but also to run after what you haven’t. At the beginning of the film, Chris Gardner can be regarded as a fail. He has no money to rent a place to live in, and his wife departs from him. He and his little son even choose a toilet as a shelter for the nights. But the man never loses the mind to struggle for a happy life; even if he loses his temper when he fights for a sleeping place the governors applies. It’s the spirits to overcome the difficulties that shocks me.

Life is like a box of chocolates and you never know what you are goanna got. But if you are working hard with a expectant heart, you will get a satisfactory consequence. So, I think, everyone must have a dream. A dream isn’t the one that you make every night or like a daydream. It’s the one that you can realize in many years. It may be that I’ll possess a big fortune, or I want to be a famous writer and so on. In a word, you must have a goal, which lets you make progresses constantly.

Actually, the most important work is not having a goal but how to stick to it. Most people haven’t a determination to finish what they have promised. What for? I think there are two reasons for it. First, the goal is too big to complete it. You should make a appropriate goal, which it is more likely to realize. Second, you haven’t a reasonable plan for your goals. You‘d better make it carefully. For instance, as a college student, you want to get a good job after graation. So your four years’ plan should be made. In first year, your English should reach a certain level. In second year, you want to get a scholarship. In third year, you join in many associations to communicate with different people. In fourth year, you take a part-time job to realize the society. In fact, your plan should be more complicated. Because the college is a long time and you can achieve lots of things ring this time.

Besides what I say above, another point is that you know what you are interested in. You may think it over before you have a try. Someone says that, the interest is the best teacher. The only thing to confine you in the work is the interest.

Nothing is impossible. You never know what you will become in the future. The man in the film finally becomes a very rich man. This is so pleasant and admiring, but we should take it for granted. Chris Gardner has done much for it. No pain, no gain. He has suffered from many pains. His wife leaves him and his son alone. He is anxious about the sleeping place every night and sells a expensive machine to support his life. In order to get through the exam, he learns all over the night and still work in the day. He is so busy that he has no time to call for damages when he was crashed by a car. Fortunately, he finally succeeds.

As a student, we should seize on the expensive time. Let’s begin from now on.

In the old time, the man that was full of encouragement in the war was respectful, and they were called hero. However, you can’t become that kind of man in this peace world. But if you have a remarkable skill, which nobody can match, you also can be a hero. It’s another kind of hero. Maybe the later one is more difficult to become. What you need isn’t the only thing---encouragement. In a word, you will make what you are, and you control yourself in the future.