辛德勒电影观后感英文

㈠ 求《辛德勒的名单》英文评价

It ("Schindler's list") has profoundly exposed the German Fascist massacre of the Jews of terrorist crimes, and has a very high artistic, the seriousness of its ideology and extraordinary artistic expression has reached almost insurmountable depth. We awarded the Oscar prize for the film, which is deserved. And Stephen Spielberg also won the Oscar Award for the first time, for his talent, this is a must for being late.
-- the sixty-sixth Oscar prize jury
"Schindler's list" has a review of the history, the development of the art of meditation, I urgently ask you to see the film.
- former U.S. President Clinton

望采纳 谢谢

㈡ 求有能力的高人帮写电影辛德勒名单的观后感，必须是用英文写,词数在不低于150.谢谢。

I've heard of Schindler's List as a classic,epic movie and a big oscar winner long before,but it's only after seen it myself have I truely understood its value to a man.
Honestly, I didn't really intend to see this movie cause I thought it's good though, but not my cup of tea. I thougt it would be too serious, the topic—WW2 and Jewish Holocaust were too grave to me, but these notion just swept off my mind right after I started enjoying it.
Suprisingly, the first half was not serious at all, on the contrary, it's rather interesting, very hollywood. It tells about how Mr. schindler earned his worth and fame in that time of turbulence,and he brags about his secret—war—to his wife.
But, as the plot goes deeper, it gripped me completely. I did knew one thing or two about dark history that jewish had undergone, but never expected it would be this inhuman,this...devil. The movie didn't exaggerate, just present us the actual scene—how people were dragged out from their home; how they were stripped naked, being driven into the gas chamber; how they were executed causally...
When the only coloured figure appears—a girl in red, poor little creature, this is the moment which striked Schindler's heart strongly and so the audience, from that moment the hero of the movie turns to be a real one, and from that moment the last piece of puzzle was put on, from then on the movie was truely complete,it become a immortal masterpiece.
So now,if any one asked me how about this movie,I would say it's just perfect, how? I really can't tell you, just see it. I won't raise any example, exactly which parts are memorable and worth talking about cause there are so many.Oh it's still live in my head the moment Ben Kingsley crumpled a fake certification and used that to deceived one of his friend through the Nazi checkpoint, he pretended to blame his friend, how careless you are, you forget your paper, what a wit.
So really, I don't think I can give you any comment about this movie, I'm out of words, and I think it's a movie not to be talked but to be watched. Watch it, and you'll know even in that age of total chaos, where the whole nation goes crazy and irrational, there would still be someone keep their conscience and do what is right.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing, Edmund Bruke said, these's the only words I came up with after finishing this movie, still I can't tell how come, just watch it and you'll never regret.

㈢ 如何评价电影《辛德勒的名单（Schindler’s List）》

电影《辛德勒的名单《辛德勒的名单》评价：情节感人，气势悲壮，而以黑白摄影为主调的纪录片式的拍摄手法更使该片具有了一种真实的效果，感人肺腑，发人深思。

当该片进行到最后，人们获得自由时，银幕上骤然间大放光明，出现了灿烂的彩色。这一明显的电影语言技巧的运用，给该片起到了很好的效果。由压抑阴沉的黑白两色到丰富的自然色彩，形象地尽显了人们解除死亡危险，重获自由后的开朗心情。

《辛德勒的名单》一片将作为电影史上永恒的光辉而存在，它是电影史上一部经典的作品。斯蒂芬·斯皮尔伯格的名字也将与这部影片联系在一起而永远流传下去。

《辛德勒的名单》成为全球最瞩目的影片，其思想的严肃性和非凡的艺术表现气质都达到了几乎令人难以超越的深度。

演员选择：

选角初期，连姆·尼森就参加了辛德勒角色的试镜，1992年12月，在看过他在百老汇舞台剧《安娜·克里斯蒂》中的表演后，斯皮尔伯格认定他是扮演辛德勒的最终人选。

为了帮助尼森准备角色，斯皮尔伯格让他研究了兄弟华纳公司总裁史蒂夫·罗斯的录像带，斯皮尔伯格一直认为罗斯的气质与辛德勒如出一辙。

拉尔夫·费因斯凭借他在《一个危险的男人：阿拉伯后的劳伦斯》和《新呼啸山庄》的表演得到了军官阿蒙·戈斯的角色，斯皮尔伯格是这样评价费因斯的：“我见到了一个性感的魔鬼。他的表演非常微妙，你会从他眼中发现仁慈的瞬间，但随即又会变为阴冷。”

为了演好这个角色，费因斯不仅增重28磅，而且还观看了新闻影片并请教了认识其饰演角色的人，从而演绎出形神兼备的魔头。当一位经历过所有事件的幸存者看到身着军服的费因斯时，竟然被吓得浑身颤抖。

㈣ 电影辛德勒名单的观后感

辛德勒名单是关于纳粹屠犹题材的经典之作。在这部影片中，既揭示了军火商、纳粹分子奥斯卡·辛德勒由邪恶走向正义，回归人性，尽其所能营救犹太人的事迹，也从正面或侧面反映出了反派人物——阿蒙·高斯从一个常人堕落为杀人机器的复杂过程。高斯这个人物的蜕变给我带来的冲击，并不亚于辛德勒。所以我觉得，解析高斯，对我们理解这部影片，乃至这个时代，都有重要意义。
尽管没有明确交代，但从一些情节和对话来看，高斯是维也纳人。奥地利直到1938年才被德国吞并。在此之前，高斯会是怎样的一个人呢？我想，大概也与常人无异吧。
后来他成为了党卫军中校，主管克拉科夫的集中营。一方面，他保持着自己作为“人”的本性——有爱情，贪财（虽然不是好品质，但却是人性的重要组成部分），嗜酒，能为辛德勒说情。他喜欢海伦，却因为她是犹太人而不敢明确表示，只能把他安排在无生命危险的家中。当辛德勒试图挽救犹太人的时候，正是抓住了这一点，作为突破口，才说动了高斯。
但另一方面，他的“兽性”逐渐膨胀，占据了主导。他奉上司之命大肆屠杀克拉科夫的犹太人。如果说这还只是奉命行事的话，那么他在别墅里肆意枪杀犹太人，恐怕不是为了钱、名，也不是受人所迫或受人指使，也不见得真的和犹太人有什么八辈子的大仇，只是为了“好玩”。辛德勒劝他像皇帝那样宽恕人，高斯就摆出一幅皇帝的架子。这只是为了“好玩”，而不是真的像宽恕他们。当他觉得不好玩的时候，又毫不犹豫地恢复了刽子手的本来面貌。
这一切如何造成？纳粹的灌输无疑十分重要；但人有残忍的本性，当这种本性受诸如命令，或杀人场面的刺激，同时又缺少引导与制约时，就会一发而不可收拾，逐渐替代善良的一面，而变成一个彻头彻尾的魔鬼。这是历史的悲剧。
高斯是数百万纳粹军人的缩影。他们都是由凡人、好人沦为野兽的。高斯的悲剧也是数百万普通纳粹的悲剧，更是犹太人、是全人类的悲剧。如何防止这种悲剧重演？这是一个值得思考的问题。

㈤ 辛德勒的名单英语观后感简单的

Schindler's list, director in structural characters of the jews, schindler's main body, the same has said, if chien is a Jew, or is such a common Germanic nationality people, so that even the great redemption, but can not improve a class. This task is set to schindler's background, a nation, and the rich high social status, as is known to all, when imperial German jewish is to hold the concept “discriminatory attitude, whether in alts or children has entrenched. While such a role, as design Germanic festival of society, the jews to the businessman, as the great redemption and rise again a class. This design is the director of the movie play for greater influence significance is more outstanding, is also the good rendering. This is a very accurate can show the director of social background, he is very important.

Entrenched ideas, must be the discrimination distorted manufacturing opinion to instill, children are a white paper, most people will attend the political empire. The true facts, and upper staff know only by the imperial German is for the public trust, the top spread, people subconsciously generated for jewish discrimination graally. When the alts proce thoughts, nature would transmit to the children, and the children's mind is not mature, to identify the ability is bad, very easily subconsciously proced this thought. This is the opinion of distortion of cadres, also as transmission in domestic propaganda fascist Japan, make public basic support of so-called ”jihad“ foreign expansion of war. The spread of the distortion of public opinion is terrible, it can completely eroded people thought that people cannot distinguish the spread of this opinion on the nose. As the nation's film sino-japanese children in the snow, take dirty stones to throw the jews, and forced out chanting go, jewish guy. If no such opinion, children's ideology of ethnic differences have no the rivalry between the two. The thought of the culprit is the person that distorted opinion.

The film redeemed reflected in his salvation in the rescue and rescue, no obvious, but he saved but is outstanding. In fact he saved is the important link of the rescue. After the war, many defeated fascism is to be handed over by the military courts as ever, schindler sanctions in close cooperation with the Nazi guard, who will save face sanctions, but here, saved the reflect the signature is saved schindler. Do one thing at a time, start may damage, and then some of his own interest income is probably not think of themselves, save others, the condition is saved himself. Absolutely everyone is mutual, nationality and race, this save in his salvation is appeared after.

In total can stimulate the slaughter of the weak, and not redeem the jews of sympathy, but the first chance to have compassion will try to salvation. When the rulers of the people, when the slaughter unilaterally people without any resistance, is strong and the weak, belong to the rivalry between the poles. In this not unfair, often can cause to the weak against outsiders proce sympathy. In such a sympathy, will be in the circumstance of thinking of redemption. Premise is that people need to have compassion. It is to cast, and slaughter victims. The killing has been endless slaughter blind, can no longer proce compassion, rooted in the thought that they have told the subconscious life as if the victim CaoGai generally. This is a period of history, can not have similar things, will power by outsiders to redeem the impotent victims. So the jews and not accidental redemption.

If a race, they face annihilation, only will capitulate blindly, not resist, waiting for their only will be destroyed. In the subconsciousness, some people have their resistance is meaningless. Because of the suffering will not stop killing, and not against the opposite effect. Always thought that the massacre is weak. In the film the jews in a narrow quarantined for the local area, they are satisfied, because no party guard, but they really dead. Very accord with the age of the jews were slaughtered. Precisely because the psychological lost souls. At the situation, without a fight against the only accept death, waiting in line, under the strong spirit, not in themselves by destroying the spirit form self-rescue consciousness, merely a mare merecfil to slaughter, with such a thought, is ultimately not perish from the reality.

自己简略一下。

㈥ 求《辛德勒的名单》的英文影评，越详细越好，谢！

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

The Holocaust is undoubtedly one of the most significant and horrifying events of the twentieth century. Between 1938 and 1945, the Jewish population was segregated and persecuted, culminating in the merciless slaughter of approximately six million Jews (this figure is quoted in the film, though most historical estimates vary between five and seven million). Amidst all this butchery, one man decided to make a difference, famously saving the lives of more than 1100 Jews- men, women and children who would otherwise have been killed.

Oskar Schindler (played brilliantly by Liam Neeson, "Batman Begins") was a Sudeten German instrialist, a wealthy womanizer who wasn't afraid to throw his money around. Always bearing his Nazi Party badge proudly, Schindler would often frequent nightclubs, extravagantly showering high-ranked Nazi officers and their girlfriends with champagne and caviar. With impeccable connections in the black-market, there was little that he couldn't get his hands on, and he was a good person to know. Buying friends was something that Schindler could do well, and he would often use these newfound alliances to aid his own business ventures. When thousands of the Polish Jew population was relegated to the Kraków Ghetto in 1941, Schindler saw an opportunity for further success, enlisting desperate Jewish investors and employing Jewish workers (who were substantially cheaper to employ) to open an enamelware factory. His connections in high places ensured lucrative army contracts, and Schindler need only have watched as his personal fortune grew, despite doing little to run the company beyond offering it "a certain panache."

It is clear from the beginning that Oskar Schindler does not harbour any racial prejudices. When Schindler requests the services of Itzhak Stern (a superb Ben Kingsley, "Gandhi"), a clever, humanitarian Jewish accountant, Stern declares that, "By law I have to tell you, sir, I'm a Jew." "Well, I'm a German, so there we are," replies Schindler indifferently, before getting straight to business. It is not race that he is concerned with, it is himself… and, of course, his money. Stern does not enjoy running Schindler's business, and he initially acquires little satisfaction from it. When Schindler attempts to convey his genuine gratitude for his profitable services with a glass of whiskey, Stern absentmindedly refuses to drink it, and an embittered Schindler drinks it himself before ordering Stern to leave.

With the arrival of Amon Goeth (played as the epitome of evil by Ralph Fiennes, "Red Dragon"), a Hauptsturmführer of the SS, the hopeless plight of the Jews grows darker. In a harrowing extended sequence, largely based on the testimonies of Holocaust survivors, the Jews are mercilessly "liquidated" from the Krakow Ghetto, many simply shot on the spot. "Today is history," proclaims Goeth. "Today will be remembered. Years from now the young will ask with wonder about this day. Today is history and you are part of it…. For six centuries there has been a Jewish Krakow. By this evening those six centuries will be a rumor. They never happened. Today is history."

This sequence also marks the celebrated appearance of the little girl in the red coat. An ingenious plot device, the character was based upon a real girl named Roma Ligocka who, unlike her film counterpart, survived the war, and wrote a memoir entitled "The Girl in the Red Coat: A Memoir". The embodiment of innocence, Schindler spots the small girl wandering amongst the black-and-white chaos of the Krakow Ghetto, and we follow her as she retreats into a building and takes shelter under a bed. When Schindler later notices her disheveled corpse carted past him to be incinerated, he is understandably horrified, unable to understand how the soldiers could possibly destroy something so innocent. This event memorably signifies the turning-point of Schindler's attitudes towards the carnage, fuelling his desire to save as many Jews as possible.

Long known as a "blockbuster" filmmaker – with such adventure classics as "Jaws," "E.T. The Extra Terrestrial" and "Raiders of the Lost Ark" to his name - "Schindler's List" was - and remains - Steven Spielberg's most mature directorial effort. Working with a screenplay that Steven Zaillian adapted from Thomas Keneally's Booker Prize-winning 'Schindler's Ark,' Spielberg treats the subject matter with the respect it deserves. Wisely choosing to depict the events as realistically as possible, Spielberg allows the images to speak for themselves. Flawless acting, stunning cinematography and a haunting John Williams score excel this film above all others of the 1990s. This is the powerful story of the difference that just one man can make, and it is a story that deserves to be seen by all. We can only feel grateful that it was Steven Spielberg who chose to be at the helm.

=========================

Rather than impress you (the reader) with a grandeur review of the movie, I will sum up what the people are saying about this movie called Schindler's List.

It's brilliant, beautifully shot in black and white, but it's a Spielberg film, it did have it's share of flaws.

Despite the many rants from other users saying that "if it's Spielberg, it mustn't be that good," I still can't understand why people would rate this film with the lowest rating possible(1 out of 10, which = awful movie).

I rated this film a 10 out of 10. Why? "Now come on, Dude, it's a Hollywood Movie" I was told by a fellow student in school. Yes, but when was the last time any Hollywood made a movie like this? When was the last time you saw a Hollywood Movie that was actually worth watching for 3 whole hours? I appreciate that any kind of film that is anything as dramatic as this can actually get made in Hollywood today, let alone get made way back in 1993. I find this film great for the fact that this doesn't stick to every Hollywood stereotype, cliche, bullsh**, and lie that seems to fill most Hollywood Movies.

Flaws. Let's face it, pretty much every film has them, even a huge movie loving geek like myself knows that. Yes, the ending is a bit pretentious(but I felt that the ending for Saving Private Ryan was a bit pretentious too, though I still think that it's also an excellent film). Having seen this a few times already I can see where the arguments over the character lacking enough depth and being rather 2-dimensional have some truth in them.

Schindler's List, like any other film, has flaws. Truth is that any film, whether it be directed by Kubrick, Stone, Tarantino, Malick, or Spielberg, will most likely have flaws no matter how noticeable or unnoticeable they are.

What I feel after several viewings. Despite the films flaws, it stands out as a very moving, well-intentioned, strong, excellent, and remarkable film. See if you want to, nobody is forcing you to see this movie. I, like many others who haven't fallen into the "Everything that is Spielberg sucks" crowd, can't deny what a powerful film this is and what a great contribution to movie cinema history it is.

===========================

Many people have told me how devastated they were when they saw this movie. But I was just bored. We talked about it and, in the discussions that followed, I was accused of not caring about the victims of the Holocaust. One person even said I was denying the Holocaust happened!

And that soured me on the movie even more. The fact is, Holocaust movies have insurance against criticism: if you say the movie is a waste of time, someone might attribute your opinion to the Holocaust itself. I don't understand it, but that weird emotional blackmail made me really uncomfortable with Schindler's List.

I thought Liam Neeson was horrible. His acting is very stiff and unconvincing. The use of hand-held cameras and black-and-white cinematography *should* work, but ultimately they amounted to subtle special effects.

I thought the movie was emotionally flat, as well. I watched each character go through the motions, wondering when something unexpected would happen. The horror of the Holocaust is shown in an almost clinical way.

I don't know. I just felt that this movie would feel less like a bid for an Oscar and more like a personal film.

At the risk of being a complete jerk, I'll give Spielberg this advice: Do it again. Make another Holocaust movie. Why not? He finished Kubrick's "AI." Kubrick had another movie in the planning stages, a Holocaust film called "Aryan Papers" (aka "Wartime Lies"). I hope he'll finish *that* Kubrick movie, too, and create a better Holocaust film, something I can sink into and be surprised by, something that feels much more personal.

=======================

I mean, has enough time passed? Or has the release of *Schindler's List* on DVD fueled a new hushed awe towards the picture?

Spielberg's critic-proof Holocaust film has several problems, the biggest of which is the way it turns a horrible real-life tragedy into a three-hanky melodrama. I continue to maintain that the Holocaust is generally unfilmable, in terms of what we might call a standard movie. Generally unfilmable, but not inevitably unfilmable. Off the top of my head, I can recommend two recent films on this subject: Francesco Rosi's *The Truce*, and Costa-Gavras' *Amen". Both films approach this material with far more nuance than Spielberg's film, which, I repeat, is weepy melodrama. (And as such, treads a fine line between reverence and tastelessness.) For that matter, Polanski's *The Pianist* gives us a more unique approach than what we get here, which is a movie that features a hero whom your average American multiplex popcorn-tub-muncher can easily identify with: a gregarious capitalist named Oskar Schindler (Liam Neeson) who, despite all the war-profiteering (read: "initiative"), turns out to have a heart of gold. Or marshmallow mush. Please don't bother pointing out that this is a "true story": those who've read the actual book by Thomas Kenneally on which the movie is based will be rather shocked by the movie's willingness to sacrifice verisimilitude for "dramatic license". The biggest example of this is the "villain" of the piece, SS-Kommandant Amon Goeth (Ralph Fiennes in a career-making performance). The screenplay ladles all sorts of Freudian syrup over this character, meaning: he's crazy as a loon. So much for the "banality of evil": instead, we get, via Fiennes' Method-y performance, a study in mere neurosis instead of a rigorous examination of the murderous pathology that's inherent in humanity. Spielberg can't resist having Herr Goeth develop a crush on one of his Jewish housemaids, and we get the requisite "Hath not a Jew eyes" speech, delivered with what is supposed to be irony by Fiennes. Then he beats the crap out of her. Change the plot particulars, and you've got your standard "Lifetime Channel" movie about an abusive husband.

Don't get me wrong, the film is not a total waste of time: even melodrama has cumulative virtues, and many of the scenes in *Schindler's List* are quite affecting, particularly the very last sequence in which the surviving "Schindler Jews" appear (in color), accompanied by the actors who portrayed them. They pay tribute to Schindler by laying stones on his grave. Moving stuff. Ben Kingsley, who portrays the worry-wart Itzhak Stern, must also receive special mention. And Spielberg's technical mastery is never open to question: this is one beautifully mounted film, impeccably photographed. The set-design, which is called upon to perform the daunting task of replicating Nazi labor camps and so forth, is beyond reproach. Proving that he's still the same guy who directed *Jaws*, Spielberg is able to send chills up our spines when a train full of Jewish women & girls is accidentally routed to Auschwitz: it's a night-scene, replete with a light-tower that approximates a beacon from Hell.

But, all-in-all, the movie remains an elementary approach to the Holocaust genre. It's tailor-made for desultory viewings by 12th-graders: "Hey mom, we learned about the Holocaust in class today." Nothing wrong with that, but aren't the kids better served by a FACTUAL documentary about this subject, rather than an Oscar-ted exercise in self-importance? You decide.

=======================

已经尽量找了四篇比较长的影评了,希望楼主能满意.

㈦ 看《辛德勒的名单》观后感5篇影评

《辛德勒的名单》让我们切身体会到了战争的恐怖。我为大家带来几篇《辛德勒的名单》观后感供大家阅读。下面是我为你们整理的内容，希望你们喜欢。

《辛德勒的名单》观后感一

影片取材于一个真实的故事，讲述了二战期间纳粹德国大规模奴役屠杀犹太人的一段沉重的历史。

当犹太人被赶往犹太区时，街头的纳粹人高声喊：“快滚吧!该死的犹太人!”透过黑白的影片，我看到那些犹太孩子眼中的光渐渐黯淡，他们知道等待他们的将是无尽的苦难与折磨。我不敢想象，他们都还那么小，心中的憧憬与对美好的向往就这样被蹂躏;就像这黑白的画面，压抑得令人窒息。纳粹对犹太人的黑暗统治使犹太人彻底成了他们的奴隶。廉价的劳役成了犹太人生存的唯一选择。后来，电影中出现了一个人物——戈特，他把屠杀犹太人当成乐趣，在他的眼中看不到任何怜悯与宽恕，他仅存的只有拒绝、杀戮和无法言语的暴戾。

我仍记得他的犹太女佣海伦说：“我捉摸不透他的喜怒哀乐，我不敢靠近他，我感觉他随时都可能杀了我。”我还记得她眼睛里噙满泪水，恐惧的眼神与抖动的身躯如暴风雨般涤荡着我的内心……

令我印象最深的是在一群逃难犹太人中的一位身着红色大衣的小女孩，她是这部影片中唯一一抹鲜红色，她天真无邪，活泼可爱，蹦蹦跳跳寻找着避难的地方，这一幕恰巧被辛德勒看到了，或许是被红衣女孩所震撼，他的目光久久不肯离开。女孩在一个沙发底下藏身，她悄悄的趴着，露出笑容。可看到这里的我心却如刀割一般痛，她多像一个天使!可混然不知恶魔的魔掌终会伸向她。后来，当红衣女孩再次出现时，是在运尸车上，她的红色大衣依然很鲜艳，可那已不再是希望了，而是我们心口的一颗朱砂痣。

电影的主人公辛德勒出生于一个富裕的德裔家庭，家境优渥，懂得享受美好生活。后因经济大萧条家道中落，来到克拉科夫寻找发财机会，交际手段高明，能言善道，靠敲诈勒索，让犹太富商给他投资;长袖善舞，靠贿赂德国军官取得官方合约。空手套白狼，短短的时间之内从两手空空发展成了大富翁以及军方的好朋友。他的本意是发财，随着故事情节的发展，让他亲眼目睹了纳粹党人的残酷暴行，看到了犹太人被肆意作文http://Www.ZuoWenWang.Net/地践踏和杀戮，他没有选择冷漠和逃避，而是巧妙地出手相助。他用高超的交际手腕买通军方，让犹太人到工厂来做工，让他们短暂逃离集中营的地狱;找个测试消防水管的借口，给火车内饥渴的犹太人带去生命之水;安慰悲苦绝望的女佣;劝告杀戮成性的军官用宽恕的管理方式;最后铸就了闪耀人性光辉的名单。不惜散尽钱财，置自身于危险，保护素昧平生的犹太人。人性的光辉在他身上层层释放。

“一流的智慧总是自相矛盾的”在辛德勒身上完美展现，他既自私自利、纵情声色犬马，又坚守善良的道德底线，彰显人性的光辉，这是一个真实的人，完美的人。他不是传统意义上的三好学生，但在关键时刻选择了做没有惠及个人利益，但却正确的事情。

战争，能揭露一个人的丑恶嘴脸，也能展现一个人闪光的一面。辛德勒在看到犹太人的惨状后，用自己的大部分财产换取犹太人的命，他的名单上打印着一千一百多个人的名字，这不仅是名单，更是一个个鲜活的生命!辛德勒舍弃了很多东西，却保护了一群生命，一个民族!

在犹太人成为自由民时，他们用唯一的金子为辛德勒做了一枚戒指，上面刻着：“当你拯救了一个人，就等于救了一个世界。”

这是辛德勒对自己的救赎，他的善行使一千多个人得以生存。想必，这是人性的光辉，是我看到的在这部影片中纳粹人的唯一闪耀的光芒。我时常想，假如我是辛德勒，我会倾其所有拯救犹太人吗?假如我是戈特，我会残忍无情地屠杀他们吗?又或者我是那个时期的犹太人，我是否能忍受避难时躲在粪坑里?是否能不惧怕死亡?我该怎么生存，又该怎么死去。我无法知道，因为我的懦弱，因为我没有勇气去面对，更不知道该如何选择。所以，我只能当一个旁观者，为辛德勒的光辉赞颂。为戈特的残忍而愤怒，为无辜遇难的犹太人而惋惜，为幸存的犹太人祝福。

时至今日，难忘的是那份厚重的名单，更历历在目的是黑白画面中穿梭在人群中的红衣女孩，她是最炽热的火焰，也是人们心中最灰暗的角落。

《辛德勒的名单》观后感二

《辛德勒名单》真实的再现了德国企业家奥斯卡。

辛德勒在第二次世界大战期间保护1200名犹太人免法西斯杀害的，真实的历史事件。

影片开始，犹太人围立桌旁衷情圣咏的心声是传统的祈祷仪式，摇曳闪动、集束不定的烛光随着合声的减弱渐渐被黑色吞没。

影片由彩色切换为黑白两色的画面。

贯穿影片始终的凄惨哀惋的小提琴独奏和几近无伴奏的混声合唱给出的强弱和谐依然不失圣咏的曲式，一位小女孩衣裙上的红色亮点短暂的跳动给出的生命色彩仍然不忘立虹为记的永约。

影片结尾处伸开的地平线上，圣咏的基调展开世俗的旋律拥过来黑压压的一群人，画面果断地转为彩色的鲜艳，横扫一切的光明，“我使云彩盖地的时候，必有虹现在云彩中，让世界五颜六色。

”

或许在开始的时候，奥斯卡。

辛德勒并不是为了救犹太人而开设工厂的，因为毕竟他是一个商人，一个精明发战争财的人，他选取犹太人做工人，是因为他们是最便宜的劳工，开始的他便是为了获取更多利润这个目的。

这些犹太人得到搪瓷厂的一份工作，因此也就得到暂时的安全，没有受到杀人机器的肆虐，辛德勒的工厂成了犹太人心中的避难所。

奥斯卡。

辛德勒，一名纳粹分子，他应该早就知道德国人建造的火葬场及煤气室，早就听说，浴室和蒸气室的喷头上流出的不是水，而是毒气。

他早就知道犹太人遭受纳粹的残酷逼害——电影中有一幕:一列列火车，一节节车厢载满了犹太人的衣物——他们的鞋子，他们的金器，他们的衣服，成堆成堆的，

堆成好几座小山，当一把一把金牙仍在验收员面前，他摆出一副厌恶又无奈的神情，接着便是拿起放大镜验证它的真伪……并不是所有的德国人都仇视犹太人，那个验收员心中应该有些为自己身为德国人而羞愧吧。

奥斯卡。

辛德勒应该也有这种感受吧，1943年，克拉科夫犹太人居住区遭受到的残酷血洗，他偶然地在远处看到了这一幕——无数的犹太人被从家中赶到了街上，一阵阵声之后，一群群犹太人倒了下去。

入夜了，以为安全了的犹太人从各自藏身的地方"走"了出来，从地板下面，从床铺下面，从钢琴中……但是他们还没来得及呼吸一口安宁的空气，

耳边又响起了声……血从天花板上渗出，从床铺下流出……一位德国指挥官悠闲地弹起了巴赫的乐曲……其时，一位德国军官对辛德勒说:"今天是历史的时刻，今天将会被纪念。

600年前，犹太人到科拉科落了脚，他们在商业、科学、教育、艺术上兴盛起来，他们一无所有的来，一无所有，却发了迹，六个世纪，形成了犹太人的科拉科，到今天晚上，六个世纪的历史成为谣言，它们从未发生过，今天才是历史。"

“今天是历史的时刻，今天将会被纪念。”

是啊，是会被纪念的，是罪证的印记!犹太人的鲜血染红了大地，更震撼了我们，生命的消逝是如此的轻易，那个遥远的年代——犹太人的生命无法由自己掌控，不必说，

那站成一排的人们被同一颗子弹穿过节约出一堆可悲的尸体;不必说，那两鬓斑白的老人被年轻的手掌呼过回响出一种人性的泯灭;不必说，那些堆成山的尸体被烈火无情的吞噬焚化出一片窒息的血色;

不必说，曾经天真无邪的孩子为了生命和延续只能躲到臭气熏天的粪坑里;不必说，一支发不出子弹的坏对着老人的脑袋不停响起，

甚至不知道哪一发会真的射出他只能这么无力在死亡线上等待……我们啊，生活在安逸的年代，从没有想象过那战火硝烟的年代是怎么的一回事，只是浅显地了解当中的皮毛。

我们能够握住我们自己的生命，生存或死亡由我们自己来选择，那时的犹太人呢?他们不能!

残酷血洗，揭示出纳粹分子的丑恶，那时多么的令人气愤，生命在他们眼中到底是什么!辛德勒醒来了，他的良心使他脱离魔鬼的行列，那时的他只有一个想法:尽可能更多地保护犹太人免受奥斯威辛的死亡。

于是他制定了一份声称他的工厂正常运转所"必需"的工人名单，通过贿赂纳粹官员，使这批犹太人得以幸存下来。

获取暴利之后的他曾对他的妻子说:“我敢说这里的人，他们不会轻易忘记辛德勒，他们会说;'奥斯卡·。

辛德勒人人都记得他，他做出了杰出的事，他能做别人所不能的，他空手来到这里，带着两只旅行箱离去，装满了世上的财富。

”说那番话时，他追逐的是金钱，但最后他得到了比金钱更可贵的财富——永恒。

施义的与受益的相互感激成就拯救的历史——人们是永远都不会忘记的。

战争结束了，下大雪的一天晚上，辛德勒与犹太人告别。

那时辛德勒哽咽地说:“我花掉了太多钱……我本可以……这辆车--十条命……这枚胸针--两条命……”他，认为自己做得不够。

“我本可以救出更多人的。”

那一刻，心里那道情感的防线很轻易的垮掉了——为他所感动，他已经很努力了。

“你已经做了很多。”犹太人stern安慰道。

影片结束时，是辛德勒的坟墓，那些在战前曾经获得辛德勒救助，而几十年后已步入暮年的犹太人，以及他们的后裔代表先人走过坟墓，都在墓碑上放一个代表"感恩永远不变"的石块作为敬礼。

那一纸名单见证了生命的永恒，那一枚指环在历史的长河中闪着灼目的光芒，“救人一命等于救全世界”，那是多少条生命啊，长眠在耶路撒冷的的辛德勒，用财富买到了永恒，成为永不被遗忘的记忆，这是生命的见证!

《辛德勒的名单》观后感三

这是一部以二战为背景，具有巨大震撼力、深沉而令人痛苦的电影。

影片的第一个镜头是烛光。一根火柴点亮了蜡烛，犹太人在祷告，赞美诗结束后烛光慢慢熄灭，变成一缕青烟，然后四周变得黑暗。

特有的黑白色画面增加了影片的厚重感，也象征着犹太人的黑暗时代。在黑白摄影的画面中，只有一个小女孩用红色，这个小女孩是黑白色调的整个屠杀场面的亮点，之后女孩子又一次出现——她躺在一辆运尸车上正被送往焚尸炉。我想正是这个小女孩触动了辛德勒，使他从最开始的一个趁机想发大财的商人，转变成一个有良知有人性的人。这部电影让我感受到强与弱、野蛮与良心的之间的冲击。

那些名单上的犹太人是幸运的，就像斯坦恩说的：“这份名单是生命，名单之外就是深渊。”。但，有更多的犹太人惨遭屠杀，这是那个时代的杯具。历史是苍白的，没有人能够篡改它黑色基调——沉重而哀伤。但是，此刻却仍然有很多人生活在炮火之下。

在中东的土地上，孩子们十几岁便放下课本，拿起路边的石块练习着打倒敌人。很难想象在贫民区的矮墙、砖块中他们的童年是多么的悲哀。

具有讽刺意味的是在欧洲面临人口老龄化的同时，中东地区的人口图却是个标准的正三角形——青年人口比例大大高于老年人口比例。他们的平均年龄甚至不到30岁!

这正是连年不断的战争造成的!新闻里常听到：“以色列对加沙实施新一轮空袭，造成巴勒斯坦6人死亡12人受伤”等等的战报，我们都早已习以为常。当这些人的生命化为一个个数字的时候，没有人哀伤。他们是战争的牺牲品，是战争的受害者。但是然后呢?没有然后了!有的只是报复，又是死伤!

记得政治书里有句话：当今世界的局势是大多数地区和平，少数地区战争。

这是一句令人可悲的话语，透露着整个世界的无奈。人性在那里早已被泯灭，拥有的只是对生命的渴望。

我想我无力改变这一切，能够的只有期望。

期望其他国家能够带给更多的人道主义援助!

期望巴以两国的停火协议能够长久!

期望全世界和平!

《辛德勒的名单》观后感四

对于和战争有关的电影，女生的兴趣一向都低于男生。

几年在北京前买了这个电影的dvd, it男看过之后推崇备至，而我却一直都没有完全看过，仅仅看过其中的一些片断。

当时印象比较深刻的是纳粹在krakow大屠杀后继续“清洗”躲藏在房子角落、夹层、壁橱或钢琴中的犹太人，其间一个德国人伴着声在钢琴上弹奏巴赫的“英国组曲”(第二组曲bwv807第一乐章)。。。

(不过我至今没有想通电影里为什么有一段德国士兵的对话，讨论这个曲子是莫扎特的还是巴赫的。。。)

最近发现当初买的盘片已经自杀，况且现在可以买到更好的版本，于是又买了一套。

买回家之后温习这旧片，终于完整地再看了一遍。

都说这个片子很长，但我坐在那里，安静地看完这个片子，一点也不感到时间的流逝。

影片是黑白的，所以，窗子是白的，钢琴是黑的;天空是白的，大地是黑的;皮肤是白的，外套是黑的;雪花是白的，鲜血是黑的。

死亡本身造成的恐惧因此被淡化，而因为被纳粹所践踏的人性和对未来的无望而产生的绝望，反而被影片推至极限。

没有看过这个片子的人，决不会体会到这种绝望，而我，我相信自己哪怕是看过十次，所感受到的，也决不会超过那真正绝望的千分之一。

那是怎样不见天日的一种黑暗啊。

而辛德勒的名单，对于那一千多个“schindler‘s jews”来说，却是那无尽黑暗中触手可及的一丝微光。

名单上的每一个名字都是一个生命，一个故事，更能燃起更多的希望。

黑白的影片中，却出乎意料地让观众看到一丝色彩，--一个身穿淡淡红衣犹太小女孩在远远的背景中奔跑，仿佛逃离了纳粹的魔掌。

但在将近结尾处一辆装满了尸体的车上，我又看到了那个小小的红色的身影，那个镜头依然是远远掠过，却唤起人心中无尽的悲伤。

影片的末尾，那些获救的“schindler‘s jews”手挽手站在地平线上，画面渐渐由黑白转为彩色，那个时刻，仿佛冰封大地瞬时充满了阳光，让我的喜悦眼泪溢满了眼眶。

我想，这部电影的感人，不在于情节，在于可以唤起所有观者心底的良知。

《辛德勒的名单》观后感五

看完《辛德勒的名单》，眼泪又一次不住的落下，尽管不是第一次看，但是仍然有种揪心的感觉。看着喻示犹太人悲惨命运的黑白画面，听着夹杂在犹太儿童清澈无比的圣歌歌声极其不协调的声，整个影片默默地展示着那段哀伤的过往。个性是那个红衣小女孩懵懂地穿行于人群，与再次出此刻运尸车上的比较更是让人悲伤。犹太民族遭遇的是一段阴暗的历史。在希特勒的领导下的第三帝国期间，根据粗略统计，约600万犹太人、数千万其他人正因希特勒的种族灭绝政策而被杀。每次读到那段历史，我读有种莫名的恐惧。但是这种恐惧却并非来自于大规模屠杀本身，而是屠杀是在极其有秩序的组织之下进行的，尽管屠杀对于人类来说确是恐怖的梦魇。不仅仅仅屠杀是流水线作业式的，就连从区分犹太人到送入集中营的所有程序都竖家机器高效率运转的结果。而最悲哀的是，每张把犹太人送进死亡工厂的证件都有法官的许可。

无论从哪个角度来看，纳粹时期的司法机关都无法摆脱助纣为虐这一污点。正因纳粹所有残酷对待犹太人的法律都是在司法机关的运作中得以顺利的执行。也许有人会辩解到，正因德国法官所受到是实证主义法学的严格训练，因此只能依照法律严格执行，哪怕有违本性。但是真实中的德国却经常跨越制定法的界限适用法律，如1939年4月法兰克福地方判处仅看了一德国少女一眼的犹太画商马克斯构成“进行侮辱和当众伤害”罪，其侮辱仅由看了一眼构成，远远超越了其司法依据《保护德国血统和德国荣誉法》里对于侮辱的界定。也许还会有人辩解说，在纳粹的思想宣传下无法辨别这样的法律是不正义的恶法，更无法拒绝适用违背正义的法律，正因没有一个足以使其忽视自身可能遭受迫害的危险，义无反顾进行公正审判的环境。无可否认在很多时候确实是形势比人强，不得已而为违心之举。然而这个理由能够用于普通的德国人，却无力抹去司法的污点。的确，当时架构于优生学基础上的纳粹法学理论对于屠杀有着充分的理由，但是作为正义守护者的司法机关却忘记了最重要的一点——对于人类个体的尊重，这一法律的终级价值目标。在强权之下，也许无法拒绝不正义之法，却至少能够逃避，至少能够选取不一样流合污。明明知道纳粹进行

的是屠杀，却仍然助纣为虐，这比直接杀人者更加恶劣。无论有着怎样冠冕堂皇的理由，即使是作为执法者在执行实实在在的法律，依然最终要为此承担职责，理解制裁。

影片的主人公辛德勒为营救犹太人所表现出来的那种对于生命的尊重，对于每个个体犹太人的尊重，正是司法机关在整个纳粹统治期间的审判里最重要的缺席者。处于纳粹疯狂鼓吹的优生学理论中，再加上战争的背景，受到同化是难免的。但是就连影片里喜爱拿集中营里犹太人做活靶的阿蒙，亦能够从对犹太女仆说“谢谢”和“我不想把感冒传染给你”等不少细微情节中感到些许温情。而最讽刺的是，纳粹司法的判决里连这种极小的人性温情都没有，只有冷酷与漠然，不仅仅对于犹太人，亦包括波兰人等一切所谓的劣等民族。最让我觉得讽刺的案例发生在1943年2月18日，14个波兰农夫因屠宰了自家的猪被控“非法屠宰罪”，9人被关进集中营，3人被判死刑。此案的司法逻辑竟然是人命不如猪命。只要此案的法官稍稍尊重一下人的生命，哪怕只是怜悯，怎会有出现如此可笑的判决呢?毕竟恶法消极执行与用心执行之间的效果是大不相同的。纳粹法官之因此恐怖，是正因其对屠刀下的弱者生命的漠视与轻蔑。正是这种漠视让法官的黑袍不再是守护者的象征，而化身为恐怖阴影的一部分。

对每个个体的人的尊重不仅仅仅只是一种人文精神，一种人文关怀，对于法律人而言，它有着特殊的好处。正因无论诗平也好，正义也好，最终都务必在每个个体人的身上体现，甚至整个司法体系都离不开透过对个体人的适用而建立。公平、正义、民主这些美丽的梦想如果离开人，也但是只是抽象的词汇象征。法律也许看起来是冰冷而无人情味的，但是那种对人的尊重却渗透在法律精神之中，从几千年前的古希腊就已经开始。正是出于这种尊重，才有了英国大宪章里“风能进，雨能进，国王不能进”的名言，才有了威廉一世与磨坊的故事，才有了三权分立而筑起的权力的堤坝，才有了“无罪推定”的刑法原则，才有了程序重于实体的实践……从苏格拉底到柏拉图，从伯林到德沃金，从古希腊到后现代，从自然法学派到女权主义法学，这种尊重都有意无意的表此刻几千年来各种学派不一样学说的字里行间。学习法律两年了，感觉自己与普通人最一样的地方并不在于学到的法律知识，而是感受到的一种法律的精神——平等，尊重，宽容。我想，对于一个合格的司法人员来说，最重要的并不是法律知识的深厚与技巧的纯熟，而是一种发自内心的尊重，尊重司法实践中所遇到的所有当事人。如果所有的司法人员都能够秉持这种态度的话，至少不会出现

如此之多的刑讯逼供与佘祥林式的杯具了。

㈧ 急需一篇看二战电影的英文观后感

《辛德勒的名单》观后感

对这部磅礴伟大的电影，实在不敢妄加评论。可是，又觉得对于这样一直想看却一直不敢看的电影，如果不写点什么，也实在难以告慰自己粗鄙又真挚的感情。

哎，好生纠结。一如辛德勒先生的每一次抉择。又很庆幸自己是在这个时候才看的这部电影，小一些时，微薄的耐性一定无法让我对着黑白片花上3个多小时，一定会干出中途睡着、吃零食等挫事来分散注意力吧？

一直以来对犹太民族都有着难以言说的好感。他们的聪明勤奋以及在世界各个领域所取得的成就为世人瞩目，甚至连他们的面容我都喜欢，尤其是女生，多半有着挺直的鼻梁，以及深邃的大眼睛，眼里总是闪烁温柔而智慧的光芒。

这样的一个民族，却一直经历着磨难。一直到现在，以色列不曾得到过真正的和平，战火蔓延，二战期间，更是经历了令人发指的疯狂屠杀，以希特勒为首的纳粹政权，将这个充满智慧、善于创造财富的民族列为劣等民族，赶尽杀绝成为最通用的政策。一个个集中营林立，枪声不断，每一声枪响，都是一个无辜的犹太人的倒下，有强壮的男人，有清秀的女人，也有稚嫩的孩童。

即使对这段历史有不算太详实的记忆，看《辛德勒的名单》时，还是一阵阵的揪心。力求还原于真实的一帧帧影像，让我只觉影片持续时间过长，实际上对于那漫长屈辱的屠杀史而言，
三个多小时不过是沧海一粟的渺小吧？

即便如此，还是深深折服。辛德勒先生的拯救行为，犹太人的顽强、乐观、聪明等美好秉性，纳粹军官的残忍，历历在目，犹如乘坐时光机，回到那段令人不忍目睹的黑暗年代。

最喜欢斯皮尔伯格的地方正在于他并不刻意强调主人公的高大全的绝对美好，而是本着纪录片的真实，因此呈现在眼前的是一个真实的人，辛德勒先生的投机心理，做为一名商人的奸诈，最开始的对于犹太人的麻木，在影片开始便能轻易知晓，但这些并不影响他的伟大。不像国内许多人物传记电影总喜欢在讴歌赞美的同时，把伟人的瑕疵一并抹去，不百分百完美誓不罢休，殊不知一个总是考一百分的好学生必定是一个无趣的学生，一个从来不曾萌生过任何小邪恶念头的人也必定是一个乏味的人。

犹太女人的智慧与果敢实在让我深深震撼。在纳粹军官要进行体检，只留下健康的犹太人以作为工人时，那些瘦弱苍白的女人纷纷刺破自己的手指，硬是挤出鲜红的血液，姑且充当胭脂，而后抹在每个人的脸上，以便让每一位女人看起来脸色红润一些，制造身体健康的假象。对生的渴望那般强烈，实在让我唏嘘不已。活着的人，为什么要鄙薄自己的生命？不过又觉得自己甚爱说教，看了这样的镜头，就要上升到生命诚可贵的高度，也实在多余。在那样艰难的情势下，选择生还是死都不容易，而在最坏的年代里，每一位犹太人却爆发出无限的勇气以及能摧毁一切的团结，即使在有限的躲藏空间里，因为空间的逼仄，而拒绝更多的人的自私与决绝，看起来还是带着一丝丝的果敢。

突然发觉自己几乎就要把犹太群体当做本片主角了，事实上，每一位犹太人的鲜活、真实，才让这部有意表现辛德勒先生的电影这般深入人心。我热爱那个民族的抗争、重建的勇气、以及能屈能伸的柔韧。这部电影里看不到《南京！南京！》中以刘烨为代表的爱国硬汉角色，犹太人的群体坚韧却一览无余。顺便多言一句，在看完该片后，便觉得南京一片的拍摄手法有多么拙劣，妄图从不同角度表现南京大屠杀，却让人对那段历史更加模糊。我总觉得，真正尊重历史的电影，不需要过多的铺垫以及渲染，近乎于纪录片的忠实，会让电影更加好看。或许我始终热爱叙事文甚于抒情文吧？

在影片的结尾，当收到幸存的犹太人送给他的金戒指，上有希伯来文：拯救一个人，就是拯救一个世界，辛德勒先生应该是情绪坍塌，一直以来以为自己已经做的很好的正义胜利感也败给了无力和沮丧，他指着自己的车，表示那能和歌德军官换10个人，又指向自己的胸针，表示那能换2个人，甚至更多。他泪流满面，抱怨自己的不够努力，没能赚更多的钱，以至于他能拯救的犹太人才区区1100多人。那一幕，着实让我动容。在倾家荡产并且就要踏上流亡之路前，辛德勒先生终于彻底展示他伟大的一面，我肯定，他对于所有无辜的人类都有着宏大的爱。那一刻，居然好想哭。真正伟大的人从来不以自己的功绩而自傲，却还在检讨自己的不足引为罪孽。事实上，正如戒指上的箴言，辛德勒先生正是那段最黑暗岁月里的那道最亮的光。他的爱与付出，让蒙受重创的犹太民族有了复兴的基础，看到片尾的文字描述，辛德勒犹太人已经有将近6000人时，深感安慰。其时是1994年，暌违15年过去，已经远远不是这个数字了吧？九泉之下，倘若有知，辛德勒先生一定会绽放舒心微笑吧？

在他简单的墓碑上，摆满了每一位扮演者及原型按照犹太仪式放下的石头，最后一位缅怀者放上了玫瑰花。在罪恶横行霸道妄图一手遮天时，正是辛德勒先生的人性绽放的光芒，让我们在漆黑里苦等也不至于彻底绝望。

写到这里，已经是五味杂陈。一张张犹太人的仓皇表情、辛德勒先生的优雅刚毅走马灯般晃过。辛德勒先生，我也想在你的墓碑上放上一块石头。