英文電影影評

A. ！！！！急求英語電影的英語影評

簡愛
Kent
State
University's
school
of
theatre
and
dance
performed
a
rendition
of
the
classic,
Jane
Eyre
this
month.
The
show
was
a
musical
with
all
of
the
necessary
elements
to
lift
you
from
your
seat
and
submerse
youinto
a
society
in
nineteenth
century
England
from
the
time
the
cell
phone
shut-off
announcement
was
made
until
the
last
note
at
the
curtain
call.
The
recurring
arches,
darkened,
soft
lighting,
and
the
use
of
a
classic
chorus
to
go
along
with
them
alluded
that
a
sinister
underbelly
of
social
status
and
reputation
were
present
in
the
performance.
One
of
the
first
things
that
an
audience
member
noticed
was
the
grandeur
of
the
set.
It
was
composed
of
a
gothic-style
foreground
with
rustic
twigs
of
a
root-like
earthy
appearance.
There
were
grand
arches
for
windows
and
entries
as
well.
Also,
the
background
was
a
large
arch
with
the
silhouette
of
roots.
There
were
also
two
matching
greek-style
pillar
arches
on
either
side
of
the
stage.
They
added
a
lot
to
many
messages
of
the
show.
For
one,
they
were
grand
structures
that
were
barren
inside
which
is
much
like
Mr.
Rochester
himself.
He
was
a
man
of
high
social
stature
but
felt
enslaved
by
his
trick
of
a
marriage
and
his
grand
yet
incomplete
(without
a
true
love)
home.
The
arches
also
suggest
the
importance
of
reputation
with
the
same
sort
of
fundamental
grand
image
yet
emptiness.
The
way
that
people
are
enslaved
yet
scramble
to
ascertain
that
solid
image
amongst
their
peers.
The
arches
were
almost
inviting
the
audience
to
come
inside
to
reveal
their
secret,
the
thing
that
was
hidden
deep
inside
that
could
send
the
structure
crumbling
in
ruin.

B. 關於經典英文電影的影評

《百萬英鎊》給我印象深刻的是它的幽默滑稽的手法，生動有趣又入木三分地展現了金錢社會的世態炎涼。具有諷刺意味的是，差不多一個世紀過去了，片中描寫的種種現象都存在於現實社會中，讓人聯想到當今社會中人們的感慨，「錢不是萬能的，但沒錢是萬萬不能的」，極具批判現實意義 。派克在片中頹廢加調侃的表演和他在銀幕上大多數嚴肅正義的君子形象迥然不同，顯示了他塑造不同類型人物的功力和演技。

C. 求一篇英語電影影評

Brave Heart 《勇敢的心》 勵志類電影 (借來)

It is about the war between England and Scotland.

But in the movie, the most important thing is not fighting. It is the pursuit of freedom that attract me most. In the age mentioned in the movie, England ruled Scotland in a cruel way. People in Scotland rebelled.

Wallace, leader of the rebellion, was a real hero. He fought bravely with his soldiers, for neither wealth nor power. What they want the most is that they could live a free life.

After long-time fighting, the rebellion was beaten down and Wallace was arrested. The ruler gave hime a last chance to confess and promised him if he did so, he might not be sentenced.

But what's Wallace's choice. At the last of his life, he abandoned the chance to survive and cried out, 'freedom'. This was the word that all people in Scotland wanted to say.

This movie tells us that there is something named freedom which is more important than life.

D. 一篇英文電影影評，100字，別太難，初一水平

2012英文影評：
The world is ending in a matter of hours, yet justice and humanity don』t penetrate through the brain-shells of politicians. In order to save their own lives, the government officials keep the secret from the rest of human kind and also lets the man whose knowledge saves their lives die. This is the premise of 2012.

But if the viewer is a Tibetan or someone who is aware of the Tibetan culture and the sensitivities of Tibetan issue, one could feel that the justice and humanity are not occurred in the director』s thought either.

There is a scene long enough to mention that takes place in Tibet. In fact the last human beings die there and the new seed of the future human race starts at the neck of Mount Everest, 「The People』s Republic of China」 the movie calls it. Perhaps what no movie reviewer noticed or saw the importance of mentioning is that the prophetic fictitious story of the movie not only makes a statement that Tibet is completely a part of China, but also it totally misrepresents the core culture of Tibetan people. A Tibetan woman killing animals in Tibet is taboo, it never happened except ring the Cultural Revolution when some women were forced to do so. Women killing chickens in the Chinese market is an everyday event, but a Tibetan woman killing a CHICKEN reflects the director』s cultural ignorance and it makes the movie even more ridiculous.

And in real life ethically speaking, Mr. Emmerich failed to hire Tibetan actors who can speak their own language. All the actors who play Tibetan characters are Chinese very poorly pretending to be Tibetans. Their Tibetan is hundred times worse than Zhang Yi』s memorized English or Leonardo DiCaprio』s Swahili (well I can imagine!).
影評翻譯
世界是結束一個小時的問題，但正義和人類不穿透腦政治家炮彈。為了挽救自己的生命，政府官員遠離了人類的其餘的秘密，也讓男子的知識，能拯救他們的生命死亡。這是2012年的前提。

但是，如果觀眾是藏族還是有人知道誰是藏族文化和西藏問題的敏感性，人們可以認為，正義和人類沒有在導演的思想也發生了。

現場有一個足夠長一提的是發生在西藏的。事實上，最後死在那裡人類和未來的人類新的種子開始在珠穆朗瑪峰的脖子，說：「人民中國共和國」的影片調用它。或許沒有發現或電影評論家看到一提的重要的是，預言的電影虛構的故事，不僅使聲明說，西藏是完全是中國的一部分，而且是完全歪曲了西藏人民的核心文化。殺害一名西藏婦女西藏動物是禁忌，但從來沒有發生過除文革期間當一些婦女被強迫他們這樣做。殺害婦女在中國市場的雞的日常事件，而是一個藏族婦女殺雞反映了導演的文化無知，這讓電影更可笑。

而在現實生活中講道德，艾里奇先生沒有聘請藏族演員誰可以講自己的語言。所有的演員扮演藏文字元誰是華人很差冒充西藏人。藏族是100倍不如章尾的背英語或萊昂納多迪卡普里奧的斯瓦希里語（好，我可以想像！）。

E. 英文電影影評100字

《阿凡達》影評：

Avatar is directed by James Cameron.The two main characters are Jake Sully,played by Sam Worthington,and Neytiri,played by Zoe Saldana.

Clones named Avatars are sent to Pandora Planet to persuade people there to leave the planet so that human beings can exploit a rare mineral.Jake is sent there to control his Avatar.

However,he comes across Neytiri and they fall in love with each other.Jake begins to see that nature and the planet should be protected.At last he and the people there work together to defeat human beings and send them back to the earth.

3D technology and the beautiful natural scenery are the two highlights of the film.The message of the film is simple—human beings should protect nature and live in harmony with it.

譯文

《阿凡達》由詹姆斯·卡梅隆執導，兩個主要角色是山姆·沃辛頓飾演的傑克·薩利和佐伊·薩爾達納飾演的奈提莉。

名為阿凡達的克隆人被送往潘多拉星球，勸說那裡的人們離開這個星球，這樣人類就可以開采一種稀有礦物。傑克被送往那裡控制他的阿凡達。

然而，他遇到了奈提莉，他們相愛了。傑克開始意識到大自然和地球應該得到保護。最後，他和那裡的人們一起努力打敗人類，把他們送回地球。

3D技術和美麗的自然風光是這部電影的兩大亮點。電影傳達的信息很簡單——人類應該保護自然，與自然和諧相處。

F. 英文電影中文影評

無論你喜歡變形金剛與否，今年最大的娛樂大片，非此莫屬。觀乎電影現在的規模，電腦特效、數碼3D、IMAX等等，已是傾全力來吸引觀眾入場，話題性（炸毀香港！）十足，兼且連場動作至超長的157分鍾，無論觀眾喜歡與否，都難以拒絕。這開場白，我已用了兩趟「無論喜歡與否」了，你就明白我喜歡與否了。
故事的內容似通非通，狂派博派的恩恩怨怨搞到糊里糊塗，火花抓狂而四處搗亂，還有無厘頭的父女准女婿情，全球走景，由美國德州走到長城、重慶而南下香港，噱頭處處，還有多得連性格都無時間刻劃的狂派、博派和A貨狂派殺手。最後還要泡製近乎世界末日式大戰，回外太空尋找造物主雲雲。
邁克爾·貝確是匠心獨運，他明白到娛樂大片的唯一生存法則：斗大，大得你無法反駁，大得你無暇兼顧，大得無論多突兀都變成順理成章。
這戲開始自狂派與博派展開黑月之戰後，芝加哥幾乎被夷為平地，汽車工程師Cade（馬克·沃爾伯格飾）無意中找到柯柏文開始，便跟少艾十七歲女兒Tessa（妮可拉·佩爾茨飾）一直不咬弦，直至戲的終結才迷途知返，明白老爹愛之偉大。這已是全部人物線索，剩下的連場火爆動作，不明所以地來到東南亞。
馬克·沃爾伯格的角色設定，是單親爸爸兼具工程專業知識，兼且一窮二白，鬱郁不得志，靠輔助變形金剛打怪物，重振父親的威信。這設計無疑針對較成熟的男性觀眾，比前三集舒拉保夫主演的青春片定位「成熟」了，但不代表人生智慧隨年漸長。倒是，它是不折不扣的動作片，馬克·沃爾伯格的扎實動作男星形像大派用場，而更重要是，戲的首三分一，全是以美國西部為背景，它的西部片意圖便昭然若揭了（包括整了含著雪茄，身上纏滿彈葯的博派機械人），它讓人想起《豪勇七蛟龍》（馬克·沃爾伯格父女和准女婿三人，再加四個博派），顯見下過心思。
其他的電影參考，還有如《末來戰士》的殲滅者機械人，他是本集的頭號大敵，與人類聯手，將博派置諸死地，燦爛、奪目、有型。可惜，他跟其他機械人的連場惡斗，都不能增加觀眾都這三方面機械人的認知。
值得留意是，邁克爾·貝愈來愈擅長引入小點子：具磁力的太空船、蟄伏多年的外星恐龍、令人變為金屬的大殺傷力武器等等，但就無視它們的全無連貫性，意念雖多卻未曾細致統一，有時更有應接不暇自相矛盾之嘆。
它是典型21世紀的爆谷電影，總之目不暇給，熱鬧繽紛就算。長期攝取這種爆谷電影，觀眾會慢慢被訓練，不求甚解地接受它的零碎、矛盾、辭不達意、過度活躍、節奏狂亂、戲味平淡、人物浮誇、特效獨大等等…吃爆谷太多，變成超重一族，要抽脂減重恐怕代價高昂了！當壞品味凌駕一切，長年累月，它要殲滅的，其實是電影這創意媒體本身，還有空間讓尊重觀眾智慧的電影出現嗎？
說到底，《變形金剛4》是計算精確的大生意，朝著全球人口最多、最大巿場進發，香港只是眾多中國城巿的showcase，香港取景部分：鰂魚涌、深水埗、中銀總行、會議展覽中心、政總等等，炸毀她，正好讓內地觀眾發泄一下對香港這城巿的復雜情緒。觀眾的期望和反應是預計之內，沒有失望，亦不見得特別精采，這就是邁克爾·貝的功力，觀眾愈捧場，票房創新高，這種變形金剛殲滅戰，以後仍會不斷上演。

上www.yp136.com包你滿意。
求採納。

G. 英語電影影評

侏羅紀公園3英文影評 Jurassic Park III(2001)2010年1月25日 "Jurassic Park III" is neither as dreadful as it might be, nor as perfectly wrought as it could be. For one thing, it moves along as jauntily as one of those horrific raptors scooting alon侏羅紀公園2失落的世界The Lost World英文影評(1997)2010年1月22日 Where is the awe? Where is the sense that if dinosaurs really walked the earth, a film about them would be more than a monster movie? Where are the ooohs and ahhhs? ``The Lost World: Jurassic Park''侏羅紀公園Jurassic park英文影評(1993)2010年1月20日 When young Steven Spielberg was first offered the screenplay for "Jaws," he said he would direct the movie on one condition: That he didn't have to show the shark for the first hour. By sl 後天The Day After Tomorrow英文影評(2004)2010年1月15日 It is such a relief to hear the music swell up at the end of a Roland Emmerich movie, its restorative power giving us new hope. Billions of people may have died, but at least the major characters ha 全金屬外殼Full Metal Jacket英文影評(1987)2010年1月13日 "Full Metal Jacket" is more like a book of short stories than a novel. Many of the passages seem self-contained, some of them are masterful and others look like they came out of the bottom 狂蟒之災3英文影評(2008)2010年1月10日 It's not surprising to note that Anaconda 3: Offspring immediately establishes itself as the weakest entry within this ongoing series, as the film boasts many of the problems and deficiencies one geDeep in the jungles of Borneo lurks the blood orchid, which blooms only once in seven years, and whose red flowers contain a mysterious ingredient, which extends the ability of living cells to reproEvery preconceived notion audiences might have about "Anaconda" is correct. This supposed serpentine shocker features doomed adventurers wading through murky water while a deadly snake app U-571英文影評When it comes to films that take place in submarines, World War II is still the favorite time period. There have been exceptions - The Hunt for Red October and Crimson Tide spring to mind - but the

H. 適合寫影評的英文電影（推薦5個吧）

推薦電影復仇者聯盟，和恐怖電影死神來了，都是大片，最近有一部電影也很不錯，推薦你看，名叫無名之輩，好看的不得了。
該片圍繞一把丟失的老槍，講述了一對低配版的劫匪，一個落魄的保安，一個身體殘疾卻性格彪悍的毒舌女，這些「無名之輩」身上發生的一系列荒誕故事。
總之是一部優秀電影。

I. 英語影評一篇

《功夫熊貓》採用純東方家庭倫理的敘事邏輯，使得整個故事更輕松。

Kung Fu Panda adopts the narrative logic of pure Oriental family ethics, which makes the whole story more relaxed.

這樣處理使得「主題」略顯單薄，但確實更適合小朋友去看。

This treatment makes the "theme" slightly thin, but it is more suitable for children to see.

這部作品不會感動到落淚，也不會無厘頭到笑翻天，但是這個平衡點才是「小朋友」最輕松的觀看環境。

This work will not be moved to tears, nor will it be ridiculous to laugh, but this balance point is the most relaxed viewing environment for "children".

(9)英文電影影評擴展閱讀

影評目的——

電影評論的目的在於分析、鑒定和評價蘊含在銀幕中的審美價值、認識價值、社會意義、鏡頭語言等方面，達到拍攝影片的目的，解釋影片中所表達的主題，既能通過分析影片的成敗得失，幫助導演開闊視野，

提高創作水平，以促進電影藝術的繁榮和發展；又能通過分析和評價，影響觀眾對影片的理解和鑒賞，提高觀眾的欣賞水平，從而間接促進電影藝術的發展。

J. 求經典外國電影影評---要英文版本的

珍珠港的影評

pearl harbour film review

Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.

Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?

If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.

Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions