15分鍾英語電影ppt下載

㈠ 大學英語：：：戰爭電影的英文PPT

穿條紋睡衣的男孩 The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas

講二戰納粹的，拍的很不錯，有深度有內容，老實說我覺得這部電影就算講一節大課都說不完的

The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas (The Boy in the Striped Pajamas in the United States) is a 2008 British film based on the novel of the same name by Irish writer John Boyne. Directed by Mark Herman and proced by David Heyman, it stars Asa Butterfield, Jack Scanlon, David Thewlis, and Vera Farmiga.

A Holocaust drama, the film explores the horror of a World War II extermination camp through the eyes of two eight-year-old boys, one the son of the camp's Nazi commandant, the other a Jewish inmate.

SS officer Ralf (David Thewlis) and his wife Elsa (Vera Farmiga) move from Berlin to the countryside with their children, twelve-year-old Gretel (Amber Beattie) and eight-year-old Bruno (Asa Butterfield), after Ralf is promoted to commandant of a Nazi concentration camp, of which Bruno refers to as "Out-With", although later in the movie his sister keeps protesting that his pronounciation is incorrect, which brings us to the conclusion that the camp is probably Auschwitz.

Confined to the grounds of the family's new home, without friends, Bruno craves companionship and adventure. He eventually escapes through the window of an outhouse, treks through the woods, and emerges at an isolated, unguarded corner of the concentration camp, which he initially believes to be a farm. There, he befriends Shmuel (Jack Scanlon), a boy of the same age. Bruno returns frequently thereafter, bringing Shmuel food and playing games with him through the barbed wire fence. Shmuel graally disabuses Bruno of the idea that the people in the camp are farmers; he tells Bruno that he and his family have been imprisoned, and forced to wear the "striped pajamas," because they are Jews.

Bruno and Gretel's tutor, Herr Liszt (Jim Norton) feeds the children a diet of antisemitic bigotry and nationalist propaganda under the guise of teaching them history. In response, Gretel becomes increasingly fanatical in her support for the Third Reich. She covers her bedroom wall with Nazi propaganda posters, and flirts with Lieutenant Kurt Kotler (Rupert Friend), a mean and nasty Nazi unlike Ralf, as her budding sexuality becomes fixated on the ideal of the German soldier. In contrast, Bruno is skeptical of Liszt's teachings. The Jews Bruno knows, Shmuel and the family's kindly servant Pavel (David Hayman), do not resemble the tutor's antisemitic stereotypes. He also witnesses savage, senseless acts of Nazi brutality that conflict with the propaganda ideal of military heroism. One night, when Pavel accidentally overturns Kotler's wine glass at the table, the furious officer drags Pavel out of the room. Through the ajar door to the kitchen, we see Kotler's jackboot delivering vicious kicks, and are led to presume that the elderly man dies from the brutal beating.

After Pavel's death, Shmuel is sent to the commandant's home in the role of a houseboy. When Bruno comes across the hungry boy cleaning glasses in the house, he gives him some cake. When Kotler sees crumbs on Shmuel's lips, and accuses him of stealing, Shmuel tells the officer the truth: Bruno is his friend, and Bruno gave him the cake. Terrified, Bruno betrays Shmuel, saying that he has never seen the boy before and that Shmuel stole the cake. Some days later, a remorseful Bruno finds Shmuel at the fence, with his eye badly beaten. Shmuel forgives Bruno, and the boys shake hands through the fence.

From a comment of Kotler's about the stench from the crematoriums, Elsa learns that Ralf presides over an extermination camp, not a labor camp as she has been led to believe. Thereafter, the couple argue repeatedly about Ralf's role at the camp and the children's proximity to it. Eventually, they decide that Elsa will take the children to their Aunt Lotte's in Heidelberg. But the day before Bruno is e to leave, Shmuel reveals that his father has gone missing in the camp. Seeing an ideal opportunity for a final adventure, Bruno digs a hole beneath the barbed wire the following morning, changes into prison clothing that Shmuel has stolen for him, and enters the camp to help Shmuel find his father. Inside, Bruno is horrified by the dehumanization, starvation, and sickness; the camp is the very antithesis of the Theresienstadt-esque propaganda film that had shaped his prior impressions.

As the boys search fruitlessly for Shmuel's father, they become intertwined with a group of prisoners who are being herded toward the gas chambers. Inside, everyone is instructed to undress for a "shower." A soldier wearing a gas mask pours Zyklon B granules into the chamber. Bruno and Shmuel grasp each other's hands tightly as the lights go out.

Back at the house, Elsa discovers that Bruno is missing, and raises the alarm. Using tracking dogs, Ralf and other soldiers follow the boy's trail through the woods. When they discover his discarded clothing at the camp's perimeter, and see the hole g beneath the fence, Ralf races inside, searching desperately for his son. Seeing the gas chamber doors locked, Ralf realizes what has happened and cries out in anguish; hearing him, Elsa and Gretel fall to their knees sobbing over Bruno's clothes. The family is left to face the tragic irony that Bruno has become a victim of the Nazi death camp run by his own father.

這些應該足夠你用了，找你需要的信息摘出來就行了

你還可以找些電影的片段，隨著片段講電影的劇情簡介（可以幾個人分著講），等劇情介紹完了感想自然就出來了，這部電影是很有感染力的，感慨生命的意義、和平的意義——這些不就是戰爭電影的本質~

㈡ 急求一篇5分鍾以上15分鍾一下的英文演講稿，附帶PPT

大學英語演講稿
:
選擇的重要性

Over the past Spring Festival, I got involved in a family dispute.
Right before I got home, four satellite channels of CCTV were added to the 14
channels we had already had. In prime time at night, they all had
interesting shows. Therefore, the five of us-my parents, my sisters and
I-had to argue over what to watch. Finally, we agreed that we should watch
the "most interesting" program... If wecould agree what that was.
However, all of us there remember that for a long time after we had TV,
there were only one or two channels available. The increase in options
reveals an important change in our life: the abundance of choice.
Fifteen years ago we all dressed in one style and in one color. Today,
we select from a wide variety of designs and shades.
Fifteen years ago, we read few newspapers. Today, we read English
newspapers
like the China Daily and the 21st Century, s well as various Chinese newspapers.
Fifteen years ago, English majors took only courses in language and
literature. Today, we also study Western culture, journalism, business
communications, international relations, and computer science.
The emergence of choices marks the beginning of a new era in China's
history; an era of diversity, of material and cultural richness, and an
era of the rebirth of the Chinese nation.
We enjoy the abundance of choice. But this has not come easily.
About 150 ears ago, China was forced to open up its door by Western canons
and gunboats. It has been through the struggle and sacrifice of
generations that we finally have gained the opportunity to choose for
ourselves.
The
policy
of
reform
and
openness
is
the
choice
that
has
made
all the difference.
Like others of my age, I'm too young to have experienced the time when
the Chinese people had no right to choose. However, as the next century
draws near, it is time to ask: What does choice really mean to us young
people?
Is
choice
a
game
that
relies
on
chance
or
luck?
Is
choice
an
empty
promise
that
never
materializes?
Or
is
choice
a
puzzle
so
difficult
that
we
have
to avoid it?
First, I would like to say: To choose means to claim opportunities.
I am a third-year English major. An important choice for me, of course,
is what to do upon graation. I can go to graate school, at home or
abroad.
I
can
go
to
work
as
a
teacher,
a
translator,
a
journalist,
an
editor
and a diplomat. Actually, the system of mutual selection has allowed me
to approach almost every career opportunity in China.
Indeed, this is not going to be an easy choice. I would love to work in
such
big
cities
as
Beijing
or
Shanghai
or
Shenzhen.
I
would
also
love
to
return to my hometown, which is intimate, though slightly lagging in
development. I would love to stay in the coastal area where life is

實用演講稿大全
演講稿書寫格式演講稿書寫技巧競聘演講稿愛國主義教育演...英語演講稿

exciting and fast-paced. I would also love to put down roots in central
and western China, which is underdeveloped, but holds
great potential.
All
of
these
sound
good.
But
they
are
only
possibilities.
To
those
of
us
who
are
bewildered
at
the
abundance
of
opportunities,
I
would
like
to
say:
To choose means to accept challenge.
To us young people, challenge often emerges in the form of competition.
In the next century, competition will not only come from other college
graates, but also from people of all ages and of all origins.
With increasing international exchanges, we have to face growing
competition from the whole outside world. This is calling for a higher
level of our personal development.
Fifteen years ago, the knowledge of a foreign language or of computer
operation was considered merely an advantage. But today, with wider
ecational opportunities, this same knowledge has become essential to
everyone.
Given
this
situation,
even
our
smallest
choices
will
require
great
wisdom
and personal determination.
As
we
gain
more
initiative
in
choice
making,
the
consequence
of
each
choice
also becomes more important.
As
we
gain
more
initiative
in
choice
making,
the
consequence
of
each
choice
also becomes more important.
Nuclear
power,
for
instance,
may
improve
our
quality
of
life.
But
it
can
also be used to damage the lives and possessions of millions.
Economic development has enriched our lives but brought with it serious
harm to our air, water and health.
To
those
of
us
who
are
blind
to
the
consequences
of
their
choices,
I
would
like to say, To choose means to take responsibility. When we are making
choices
for
ourselves,
we
cannot
casually
say:
"It's
just
my
own
business.
" As policy makers of the next century, we cannot fail to see our
responsibility to those who share the earth with us.
The traditional Chinese culture teaches us to study hard and work hard
so as to honor our family. To me, however, this family is not just the
five
of
us
who
quarreled
over
television
programs.
Rather,
it
is
the
whole
of
the
human
family.
As
I
am
making
my
choices,
I
will
not
forget
the
smile
of
my
teacher
when
I
correctly
spelled
out
the
word
"China"
for
the
first
time, I will not forget the happy faces of the boys and girls we helped
to send back to school in the mountains of Jiangxi Province. I will not
forget the tearful eyes of women and children in Bosnia, Chechnya and
Somali, where millions are suffering from war, famine or poverty.
All these people, known and unknown, make up our big human family. At
different
points,
they
came
into
my
life
and
broaden
my
perspective.
Now
as
I
am
to
make
choices
for
myself,
it
is
time
to
make
efforts
to
improve
their
lives,
because
a
world
will
benefit
us
all
only
if
every
one
in
it

can lead a peaceful and prosperous life.