七宗罪電影觀後感英文300
① 七宗罪的觀後感 英文
Director David Fincher doesn't want his audience to be comfortable for a moment while watching "Seven." Shaky camera shots, dark sets and a disturbing script that takes its characters to the extremes of emotion all contribute to the film creating a unsettled feeling that stays with you for a couple hours after the credits roll.
The film begins with the overused premise of a young cop (Brad Pitt) being teamed for a murder investigation with an veteran on the verge of retirement (Morgan Freeman). The two quickly develop a tense disrespect for each other, Pitt being the cocky smartass type (who is nonetheless optimistic about the future) and Freeman the hardened, pessimist New Yorker who has seen it all.
Their investigation of a bizarre murder, in which an obese man is forced to eat himself to death, turns into a hunt for a serial killer who uses the seven deadly sins -- gluttony, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy and wrath -- as his calling card. The second victim, a rich lawyer, is the not-so-subtle tip off -- "greed" is written in blood on his carpet.
What gives "Seven" it's unsettling impact is the way the film connects deeply with each character, even the victims who are never seen alive. Freeman, Pitt and Gwyneth Paltrow ("讓此羨扒盯Flesh and Bone") as Pitt'坦拍s wife are all in top form here and the audience comes to know them intimately -- whatever affects them, affects the viewer equally. This is especially true of Pitt, whose character struggles to maintain his optimism in the face of the horrors he sees.
The killer is played, by a well-known actor who is not named in the opening credits (the procers want to keep his identity a surprize), with a calm but explosive demeanor conspicuously reminiscent of Anthony Hopkins in "Silence of the Lambs."
Although very little of the violence in "Seven" is on screen, it is by design considerably more disturbing than a horror movie or more mild thrillers like "Misery."
The tension is so well played that even though the unsatisfying conclusion becomes obvious a good 15 minutes before the climax, it doesn't diminish at all the churning feeling in the pit of you stomach as you leave the theater. Because of the way it assaults the emotions, seeing "Seven" should not be taken lightly. It's a difficult movie to forget.
這個也許行
② 七宗罪是什麼
七宗罪，the seven deadly sins：
饕餮（Gluttony）淫慾（Lust）貪婪（Greed）憤怒（Wrath）嫉妒(Envy)，懶惰(Sloth)，以及傲慢（Pride）
七宗罪之中以饕餮為最輕，以傲慢為最重。饕餮和淫慾為肉身之罪，而貪婪、懶惰、憤怒、嫉妒以至傲慢均為心罪。肉身之罪可償，而心罪卻難償。
但丁在神曲里根據惡行的嚴重性順序肆激排列七宗罪，其次序為：
一）好色－不合法禮的性慾，例如通姦。（但丁的標準是『過份愛慕對方』，而這樣便會貶低了神對人們的愛）
二）貪食－浪費食物，或是過度放縱食慾、酗酒或屯積過量的食物。（但丁的觀點是『過份貪圖逸樂』）
三）貪婪－希望佔有比所需更多為之貪婪。（或是以但丁的觀點，貪婪是『敏脊過度熱衷於尋求金錢上或權力上的優越』）
四）懶惰－懶惰及浪費時間。（懶惰被宣告為有罪是因為： 其他人需更努力工作以填補缺失，因應該的事情還沒有做好，對自己是百害而無一利）
均衡：一方比另一方付出更多。（從但丁的神學觀念上去看，懶惰是『未能全心愛上帝，未能全副精神愛上帝，未能全人之心靈愛上帝』－具體來說包括懶惰、怯懦、缺乏想像力、滿足及無責任心）
五）憤怒－源自憎恨而起的不適當（邪惡的）感覺，復仇或否定他人，在律法所賦與的權力以外，行使懲罰他人橋雹滲的意欲亦被歸作憤怒。（但丁描述為"love of justice perverted to revenge and spite"）
六）妒忌－因對方所擁有的資產比自己豐富而心懷怨怒。（但丁說：『Love of one's own good perverted to a desire to deprive other men of theirs』）
七）驕傲－期望他人注視自己或過度愛好自己。（因擁有而感到比其他人優越）(holding self out of proper position toward God or fellows; Dante's definition was "love of self perverted to hatred and contempt for one's neighbor")
③ 七宗罪觀後感200字就行 用心理學闡述
《七宗罪》講述了老探員薩默塞特和年輕的警察米爾斯追查連續殺人案的故事，而殺人犯John是一個變態的宗教殺手，自己認為自己是神派來的使者，代表神以七宗罪的來懲罰世人。老探員薩默塞特則看多了太多的殺人案件和了解很多犯人枝基的性格，在偵查案件事表現出冷靜，特別是最後車子里，一句話都沒有說，對於犯人解釋表現出習慣以至於不去和犯人反駁。年輕的警察米爾斯一心想抓到犯人，但由於自己的沖動，被犯人誘導去犯罪，最終由執法者變成犯罪人。
影片的john不是沒有文化，相反是受過高等教育，智商也極高，但反而卻成為了危害社會的人。由於受到宗教的影響，加上社會上的種種原因，犯人就用七宗罪來衡量這個社會，對犯有七宗罪之一的人連續殺害，但對自己所犯的罪，卻只有七宗罪之一的嫉妒，完全沒有對自己殺人而感到罪惡，自己認為自己是替神辦事，幫助社會。影片中的john是典型的反社會人員，他們的人格扭曲，開始異化，脫離現實社會思想。他想用七宗罪來告誡世人，但自己卻製造人去犯七宗罪，而不是去感化慎談和告誡，把罪行強加於別人，只顧及自己的計劃，只是用自己的角度來看一個人的罪行，他所說的罪行其實都是他自己想的，沒有用社會角度來衡量他的罪惡程度。所以犯人john是一個嚴重的偏執狂，猛孝謹思想過度誇張。
至於年輕的警察米爾斯，最終無法控制自己的情緒而私自殺死犯人。作為一個警察，卻無法控制自己的情緒。可以看出，人性的脆弱，造成了沖動性犯罪。米爾斯是由於自己的性格，然後被外界因素影響也導致他犯罪，說明犯罪人有些是無法控制自己的性格而導致犯罪，性格也是犯罪的起源之一。
老探員薩默塞特則是辦案的老手，當他看到犯人留下的暴食和貪婪時，知道犯人是以七宗罪來連續殺人，然後就去查看有關七宗罪的書，來猜測犯人的心理和作案方法。說明了，猜測犯人的心理是破案關鍵和線索。
《七宗罪》講述了3個人的故事，表現出犯罪和心理的關聯性。
④ 關於七宗罪
七宗罪——饕餮、貪婪、懶惰、淫慾、傲慢、嫉妒和暴怒——被天主教認為是遭永劫的七種大罪，曾屢次出現在《聖經》、著名繪畫作品及中世紀教會人士佈道的題目中，特別是在托馬斯·阿奎那的宗教著作、但丁的《神曲》和喬叟的《坎特伯雷故事集》中的論述猶為著名。
「Seven」在宗教上是個神秘的數字，這一點在舊約中有最充分的表現。上帝用七天造亞當，取出亞當的第七根肋骨造了夏娃。撒旦的原身是有七個頭的火龍（《啟示錄》第十二章第三節寫道:「有一條大紅龍，七頭，也戴著冠冕……火龍就是那古蛇，名叫魔鬼，又叫撒旦，是迷惑普天下的……」），撒旦也是地獄中最大的魔王，共有七名墮落天使被稱為撒旦，其中最有名的莫過於路西法 (Lurifer)，《失樂園》記述的其實就是路西法，其餘六名被稱為撒旦魔王的墮落天使是：何撒茲勒 (Azazel，電影《驅魔人》中提及的惡魔。) 、別西人(Beelzubub)、彼列 (Beliel)、亞巴頓 (Abadon)、莫斯提馬 (Mastema)、薩麥爾 (Samael)。到十六世紀後，基督教更直接用撒旦的七個惡魔的形象來代表七種罪惡（七宗罪，the seven deadly sins）：傲慢 (Pride)，嫉妒(Envy)，暴怒(Wrath)，懶惰(Sloth)，貪婪(Greed)，饕餮(Gluttony)，以及貪欲(Lust)。
------------------------------------
七宗罪
七宗罪屬於人類惡行的分類，並由13世紀神道會神父聖多瑪斯?阿奎納列舉出各種惡行的表現。天主教教義中提出『按若望格西安和教宗額我略一世的見解，分辨出教徒常遇到的重大惡行』。『重大』在這里的意思在於這些惡行屬於原罪，例如盜賊的貪婪源於慾望。
這些惡行最初是由希臘神學修道士龐義伐草撰出8種損害個人靈性的惡行，分別是貪食、好色、貪財、傷悲、憤怒、懶惰、自負及驕傲。龐義伐觀察到當時的人們逐漸變得自我中心，尤以驕傲為甚。懶惰在這里是指『精神上懶惰』。
六世紀後期，教宗額我略一世將那8種罪行減至7項，將自負歸並入驕傲，懶惰歸並入傷悲，並加入妒忌。他的排序准則在於對愛的遺背程度。其順次序為：驕傲、妒忌、憤怒，傷悲、貪婪、貪食及好色。較後期的神學家如聖多瑪斯?阿奎納則對這個排序方式抱有不同的意見。
相對於七宗罪，天主教列出了七德行（謙卑，溫純，善施，貞潔，適度，熱心及慷概）。
『重大惡行』與不可饒恕的大罪是不可混而一談。
但丁在神曲里根據惡行的嚴重性順序排列七宗罪，其次序為：
一）好色－不合法禮的性慾，例如通姦。（但丁的標準是『過份愛慕對方』，而這樣便會貶低了神對人們的愛）。
二）貪食－浪費食物，或是過度放縱食慾、酗酒或屯積過量的食物（但丁的觀點是『過份貪圖逸樂』告肢州）。
三）貪婪－希望佔有比所需更多為之貪婪（或是以但丁的觀點，貪婪是『過度熱衷於尋求金錢上或權力上的優越』）。
四）懶惰－懶惰及浪費時間
懶惰被宣告為有罪是因為：
其他人需更努力工作以填補缺失
因應該的事情還沒有做好，對自己是百害而無一利
均衡：一方比另一方付出更多（從但丁的神學觀念上去看，懶惰是『未能全心愛上帝，未能全副精神愛上帝，未能全人之心靈愛上帝』－具體來說包括懶惰、怯懦、缺乏想像力、滿足及無責任心。
五）憤怒－源自憎恨而起的不適當（邪惡的）感覺，復仇或否定他人，在律法所賦與的權力以外，行使懲罰他人的意欲亦被歸作憤怒（但丁描述為"love of justice perverted to revenge and spite"）。
六）妒忌－因對方所擁有的資產比自己豐富而心懷怨怒（但丁說：『Love of one's own good perverted to a desire to deprive other men of theirs』）。
七飢棚）驕傲－期望他人注視自己或過襪蔽度愛好自己（因擁有而感到比其他人優越）(holding self out of proper position toward God or fellows; Dante's definition was "love of self perverted to hatred and contempt for one's neighbor")。
各種罪行其實環環相扣，and various attempts at causal hierarchy have been made。例如驕傲（過度迷戀自己）其實暗示了貪食（過份消耗或浪費食物），其餘各種罪行亦有相同的連系。每種罪行其實在表現出自視比神更重要，因而未能全心全意全神地投入去愛神。The Scholastic theologians developed schema of attribute and substance of will to explain these sins.
四世紀當時的埃及僧侶 Evagrius Ponticus defined the sins as eight deadly "passions", and in 東正教，these impulses are still characterized as "deadly passions" rather than sins in and of themselves. Instead, to invite and entertain or to refuse to attempt resistance against these passions is considered sinful in Orthodox Christian moral theology.
在天主教教義, consisting of 2,865 numbered sections and first published in 1992 by order of 教宗若望·保祿二世, the seven deadly sins are dealt with in one paragraph. The principal codification of 道德 transgression for Christians continues to be the 十誡 and the 至福, which are a positive statement of morality.
四種基本美德和神學三美德合稱為七德行。
As was previously mentioned, the Latin words for the sins are: superbia, invidia, ira, accidia, avaritia, gula and luxuria. The first letters of these words (with the order changed) form the medieval Latin word saligia, whence the verb saligiare (to commit a deadly sin) is taken.
與惡行相呼應的惡魔
1589年Peter Binsfeld把每種罪行配對各個惡魔，who tempted people by means of the associated sin. 根據 Binsfeld 的分類，其配對如下：
Lucifer：驕傲
Mammon：貪婪
Asmodai：好色
Satan：憤怒
Beelzebub：貪食
Leviathan：妒忌
Belphegor：懶惰
⑤ 急求電影《七宗罪》英文觀後感一篇~~~英文簡單一些，本人英語水平不是很高謝謝!!
Seven," a dark, grisly, horrifying and intelligent thriller, may be too disturbing for many people, I imagine, although if you can bear to watch, it you will see filmmaking of a high order. It tells the story of two detectives - one ready to retire, the other at the start of his career - and their attempts to capture a perverted serial killer who is using the Seven Deadly Sins as his scenario.
As the movie opens, we meet Somerset (Morgan Freeman), a meticulous veteran cop who lives a lonely bachelor's life in what looks like a furnished room. Then he meets Mills (Brad Pitt), an impulsive young cop who actually asked to be transferred into Somerset's district. The two men investigate a particularly gruesome murder, in which a fat man was tied hand and feet and forced to eat himself to death.
His crime was the crime of Gluttony. Soon Somerset and Mills are investigating equally inventive murders involving Greed, Sloth, Lust and the other deadly sins. In each case, the murder method is appropriate, and disgusting (one victim is forced to cut off a pound of his own flesh; another is tied to a bed for a year; a third, too proud of her beauty, is disfigured and then offered the choice of a call for help or sleeping pills). Somerset concludes that the killer, "John Doe," is using his crimes to preach a sermon.
The look of "Seven" is crucial to its effect. This is a very dark film, the gloom often penetrated only by the flashlights of the detectives. Even when all the lights are turned on in the apartments of the victims, they cast only wan, hopeless pools of light.
Although the time of the story is the present, the set design suggests the 1940s; Gary Wissner, the art director, goes for dark blacks and browns, deep shadows, lights of deep yellow, and a lot of dark wood furniture. It rains almost all the time.
In this jungle of gloom, Somerset and Mills tread with growing alarm. Somerset intuits that the killer is using books as the inspiration for his crimes, and studies Dante, Milton and Chaucer for hints. Mills settles for the Cliff Notes versions. A break in the case comes with Somerset's sudden hunch that the killer might have a library card. But the corpses pile up, in cold fleshy detail, as disturbingly graphic as I've seen in a commercial film. The only glimmers of life and hope come from Tracy (Gwyneth Paltrow), Mills' wife.
A movie like this is all style. The material by itself could have been handled in many ways, but the director, David Fincher ("Alien 3"), goes for evocative atmosphere, and the writer, Andrew Kevin Walker, writes dialogue that for Morgan Freeman, in particular, is wise, informed and poetic. ("Anyone who spends a significant amount of time with me," he says, "finds me disagreeable.") Eventually, it becomes clear that the killer's sermon is being preached directly to the two policemen, and that in order to understand it, they may have to risk their lives and souls.
"Seven" is unique in one detail of its construction; it brings the killer onscreen with half an hour to go, and gives him a speaking role. Instead of being simply the quarry in a chase, he is revealed as a twisted but articulate antagonist, who has devised a horrible plan for concluding his sermon. (The actor playing the killer is not identified by name in the ads or opening credits, and so I will leave his identity as another of his surprises.) "Seven" is well-made in its details, and uncompromising in the way it presents the disturbing details of the crimes. It is certainly not for the young or the sensitive. Good as it is, it misses greatness by not quite finding the right way to end. All of the pieces are in place, all of the characters are in position, and then - I think the way the story ends is too easy. Satisfying, perhaps. But not worthy of what has gone before.
⑥ 七宗罪的英文
Seven Deadly Sins
重點詞彙解析：
sin
英 [sɪn] 美 [sɪn]
n. 原罪
v. 犯罪；違反(教規)
He thinks it's a sin to covet other's properties.
他認為貪圖他人的財物是有罪的。
commit a ～ 犯罪
forgive a ～ 寬恕罪過
(6)七宗罪電影觀後感英文300擴展閱讀
相近詞彙辨析——
crime，sin，guilt，offence，violation
這些名詞均含有「犯法，犯罪，罪惡」之意。
crime指嚴重的違法行為或罪行。
sin主要指違反道德原則或違反宗教戒律的過失或罪過行為。
guilt多用於指違反道德或社會標準的不法行為，含應予懲辦之意。這種懲辦是以證據為根據的。
offence使用廣，可泛指對任何規則、道德標准、法律、紀律等的違反與觸犯，其罪行可重可輕。
violation指違背誓言、條約、規則以及良心等，也指侵犯權利。
⑦ 電影《七宗罪》觀後感及疑點
我一直以為好電影是要給人啟發或者傳達給人想法的！據說《七宗罪》是一部好電影才看的。看了之後呢？沒覺得有什麼啟發，也沒感受到導演要傳達的東西慎謹！想想可能是自己笨吧！看影評！結果呢？影評全都是爭論最後那個盒子裡面裝的是什麼！他老婆打底死沒死！我很疑惑！難道導演拍這個電影就是想傳達那個女人到底死沒死？我的磨春愚見是管她死沒死！這只是一部電影寬游基，不是歷史事件何必那麼較勁？這部電影到底傳達了什麼給我們？是提示人們大家都在犯著這七種罪孽嗎？這大家一直都知道啊！那然後呢？警示人們不要犯嗎？很明顯不可能啊！那到底是幹嘛？嚇唬大家犯罪了會有人來懲戒你？我真的模糊了！他想說什麼？什麼是好的電影！可能我真的太笨！
⑧ 求《七宗罪》1500字的電影觀後感，從心理學角度
七宗罪》觀後感
暴食、貪婪、懶惰、淫慾、傲慢、嫉妒和暴怒——被天主教認為是遭永劫的七種大罪，在你的身上，有它們的影子嗎？ 冬天的早晨，天陰沉沉的。
電影《七宗罪》在電腦屏幕上不斷切換境頭。人，也不由得驚悚起來。剛剛看這部電影，看前面部分老少警察搭檔破案，覺得和一般的偵探電影並沒有多大區別時，甚至有放棄的想法，直到後來才發現它的精彩。
這是部以破案為引子，帶有濃厚宗教色彩的片子。故事的背景是骯臟的城市，動盪的居住環境，對情感難以把握的人心，似乎所有的都無以為靠。影片以黑色及灰色為主題背景，色彩不血腥卻具有強烈的明暗差，時常出現的狹小黑暗的房間，手電筒強烈的光線不斷出現在偵案現場。
老警察沙摩塞還有七天就可以退休，命案卻一樁接一樁發生，當他將毫無關聯的三樁命案聯系起來，意識到將發生《聖經》里被天主教認為遭永劫的七種大罪時，本打算退出此案，後還是決定留下來與新警察米爾斯一起。案發現場沒有任何指紋，直到發生五樁命案，警察卻沒能找到任何蛛絲馬跡時，兇手約翰卻來到警察大廳自首了，帶著他的血淋淋的十指和平靜的微笑。
這讓所有人都費解，約翰主動被警察所困，那他將如何去實施他未完成的兩樁命案呢？懸念頓生。影片中約翰的出鏡不多，主要集中在後半部分，但卻給我最深的印象。他帶兩個警察一起去郊外尋找最後兩具屍體，坐在警車上隔著鐵欄談話的表情和語言，是全片的亮點。輕緩的語言講述著他經手的五宗罪，眼神里盪漾著一種輕微的波浪，以至於你會覺得從他口中出來的殘忍語言，都帶著一絲優雅的色彩。你會相芹灶信，他所說的，都是有道理的。就是這樣一個自信卻宏畝邪惡的佈道者，和米爾斯被激怒的粗暴神態形成強烈對比，你甚至會站在約翰的角度來說：「看吧，這就是渾身罪惡的人們！」
約翰因嫉妒米爾斯及其妻子翠茜的幸福，割下翠茜頭顱讓人送至案發現場，米爾斯暴怒之下擊斃約翰，這種結局出人意料之外，卻又似在情理中。此時，你似乎不得不佩服約翰的眼力，選中了米爾斯做為第七宗罪：「暴怒」的代替者是完全對的。而約翰自己，卻是以那種邪惡自信的笑容坦然地面對被殺，因為他知道自己犯了「嫉妒」罪。約翰雖死，但他卻是以一種勝利者的姿態死的，因為所有的都在他的掌控中，他完成了上帝交給他的任務。這個最引人眼球的結局發生在七天後的七點鍾，那帶著神秘色彩的「七」上。
約翰是個追求完美的人，只是這份完美過份極瑞，在剝奪了那些「罪惡者」生存權利的同時，也無法原諒自己的「罪惡」。他的笑，似一個詛咒，牽引著人們審視自身。
沙摩塞，這個辦案慎密、行走孤獨的老警察，對於社會上存在的醜陋早已司空見怪，他會告訴米爾斯遇到搶劫時嫌絕扮不要叫救命而喊救火，他不要孩子，因為不想讓孩子出生在這個骯臟的世界。他就這樣不緊不慢地生活在這個骯臟的城市，冷眼旁觀著一切。
米爾斯，脾氣暴燥，卻有著善良的心地，他似一個孩子般愛著家中的
寵物和妻子，卻因這份對妻子的疼愛，在得知妻子被殺後無法抑制的悲痛終於爆發，以至於殺死了兇手。
執法者與上帝的傳道者都有罪，活在這個世界上，誰能沒罪呢？ 海明威曾說：「這個世界如此美好，值得人們為它奮斗」 。看完這部影片，這兩句話我都不認同。
⑨ 電影《七宗罪》的英文簡介
There are seven Catholic death penalty, but a series of bizarre murders, seven of the victims were killed in this one. Somerset full experience of detectives and make unremitting efforts to finally does not appear to be linked to the murder of a loss as to how many, 5 after the murder, the murderer who is the next target? Where? No one can foresee. Police at a loss e, the killer turned himself in the miraculous, and this time the perpetrators of the "seven sins" is still two, I wonder if he will stop there? He also Zitouluowang Why? The perpetrators claim to the "great masterpiece" will be completed in the tight custody of the police, the murderer Chachinanfei can do it again? The outcome of people far beyond the expected.
Seven made it clear that the Catholic Church: "gluttonous" and "greedy" and "lazy" and "jealous" and "proud" and "anger" and "Yin Yu." Sha Mose is the host of senior homicide police, who will soon retire but Mills is a novice, to pay a high interest, please voluntarily to the branch. Monday morning, a murder, assailants in the refrigerator after the words "gluttonous", Tuesday, is a lawyer at the scene with the words "greed", a day, depending on the seven died. In the face of the case, Sha Mose earned the hearts of many al-living in the city for a long time, he has long habit of looking at things coldly, like this is not the case then, after consideration and stay to help Mills, Mills gas side Just, irritability impulse, mystify the killer on his election as a result of the last seven - "angry." Strong was killed meters to anger his wife, Tracy. Allow themselves to be "jealous", Mills became "angry" and a strong won this game. Sand can be retired, but looking at the Black Maria Mills, is what the community has always been in such a miserable, or simply naive is also a crime.
天主教中有七種死罪，然而一場離奇的連環殺人案，受害者都是死於這七宗罪其中的一種。經驗十足的警探Somerset經過不懈的努力，終於將這些看似沒有聯系的命案屢出頭緒，五樁命案過後，兇手下一個目標是誰？在何處？沒有人可以預見。正當警方不知所措之際，兇手奇跡般的自首了，此時兇手的「七宗罪」還差兩宗，難道他會就此罷手？他又為何會自投羅網？兇手宣稱自己的「偉大傑作」仍會完成，在警方的嚴密看管下，插翅難飛的殺人犯又能做什麼呢？結局大大出乎人的意料。
天主教明言七宗罪：「饕餮」、「貪婪」、「懶惰」、「嫉妒」、「驕傲」、「憤怒」、「淫慾」。沙摩塞是承辦兇殺案的資深員警，即將退休，而米爾斯是新手，一付興致高昂，自願請調至這一分局。星期一上午，一件兇殺案發生，兇手在冰箱後寫著「饕餮」，星期二，是一位律師，現場寫著「貪婪」，一天一個，依七宗罪而死。面對此案，沙摩塞心中有諸多掙札，住在這城市已久的他，早已習慣，冷眼看事情，本想不接此案，幾經考慮又留下來幫米爾斯，米爾斯血氣方剛，沖動易怒，故弄玄虛的兇手因而選上他做為七宗罪的最後一人－「憤怒」。強竟殺了米的妻子崔西來激怒他。讓自己成為「嫉妒」，米爾斯成為「憤怒」，強也贏得了這場游戲。沙可以退休了，但看著囚車中的米爾斯，究竟是社會始終如此不堪，或者天真單純也是一種罪。
對照的是中文 , 翻譯不容易,希望樓主給分`
⑩ 七宗罪的觀後感 英文
Although not originating from the bible, the concept of deadly sins is almost as old as Christian doctrine itself. Theologians like 4th century Greek monk Evagrius of Pontus first compiled catalogues of deadly offenses against the divine order, which 6th century pope Gregory the Great consolidated into a list of seven sins, which in turn formed the basis of the works of medieval/renaissance writers like St. Thomas Aquinas ("Summa Theologiae"), Geoffrey Chaucer ("Canterbury Tales"), Christopher Marlowe ("Dr. Faustus"), Edmund Spenser ("The Faerie Queene") and Dante Alighieri ("Commedia Divina"/"Purgatorio"). And in times when the ability to read was a privilege rather than a basic skill, the depiction of sin in paintings wasn't far behind; particularly resulting from the 16th century's reformulation of church doctrine, the works of artists like Hieronymus Bosch and Pieter Bruegel the Elder brought the horrific results of humankind's penchant to inlge in vice back into general consciousness with surrealistic eloquence, reminding their viewers that no sin goes unseen (Bosch, "The Seven Deadly Sins") and that its commission leads straight into a hell reigned by gruesome, grotesque demons and devils whose sole purpose is to torture those fallen into their hands (Bosch, "The Hay-Wagon" and "The Last Judgment;" Bruegel, "The Triumph of Death" and "The Tower of Babel").
More recently, the seven deadly sins have been the subject of Stephen Sondheim's play "Getting Away With Murder" and a ballet by George Balanchine ("Seven Deadly Sins"); and on the silver screen the topic has been addressed almost since the beginning of filmmaking (Cabiria [1914], Intolerance [1916]). Thus, "Se7en" builds on a solid tradition both in its own domain and in other art forms, topically as well as in its approach, denouncing society's apathy towards vice and crime. Yet - and although expressly referencing the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas, Chaucer and Dante - David Fincher's movie eschews well-trodden paths and grabs the viewer's attention from the beginning; and it does so not merely by the depiction of serial killer John Doe's (Kevin Spacey's) crimes, which could easily degenerate into a mindless bloodfest that would defeat the movie's purpose. (Not that there isn't a fair share of blood and gore on display; both visually and in the characters' dialogue regarding those details not actually shown; but Fincher uses the crimes' gruesome nature to create a sense of stark realism, rather than for shock value alone.) In addition, Doe's mindset is painstakingly presented by the opening credits' jumpy nature, his "lair"'s apocalyptic makeup and his notebooks, all of which were actually written out (at considerable expense), and whose compilation is shown underlying the credits. The movie's atmosphere of unrelenting doom is further underscored by a color scheme dominated by brown, gray and only subed hues of other colors, and by the fact that almost every outdoors scene is set in rain. Moreover, although screenwriter Andrew Kevin Walker explains on the DVD that the story was inspired by his observations in New York (and the movie was shot partly there, partly in L.A.), it is set in a faceless, nameless city, thus emphasizing that its concern isn't a specific location but society generally.
Central to the movie is the contrast between world-weary Detective Somerset (Morgan Freeman) who, while decrying the rampant occurrence of violence in society, for much of the movie seems to have resigned himself to his inability to do something meaningful about this (and therefore seems to accept apathy for himself, too, until his reluctant final turnaround), and younger Detective Mills (Brad Pitt), who fought for a reassignment to this particular location, perhaps naively expecting his contributions to actually make a difference; only to become a pawn in Doe's scheme instead and thus show that, given the right trigger, nobody is beyond temptation. As such, Somerset and Mills are not merely another incarnation of the well-known old-cop-young-cop pairing. Rather, their characters' development over the course of the film forces each viewer to examine his/her own stance towards vice.
Morgan Freeman and Brad Pitt perfectly portray the two detectives; while Freeman imbues his Will Somerset with a quiet dignity, professionalism and learning, muted by profound but not yet wholly irreversible resignation, Pitt's David Mills is a brash everyman from the suburbs with an undeniable streak of prejudice, a penchant for quick judgment and a thorough lack of sophistication, both personally and culturally. Notable are also the appearances of Gwyneth Paltrow (significantly Brad Pitt's real-life girlfriend at the time) as Mills's wife Tracy and ex-marine R. Lee Ermey as the police captain. Yet, from his very first appearance onwards, this is entirely Kevin Spacey's film. Reportedly, Brad Pitt especially fought hard for his casting; and it is indeed hard to imagine "Se7en" with anybody other than the guy who, that same year, also won an Oscar for portraying devilish Keyser Soze in "The Usual Suspects": No living actor has Spacey's ability to simultaneously express spine-chilling villainy, laconic indifference and limitless superiority with merely a few gestures and vocal inflections.
While "Se7en" can certainly claim the "sledgehammer" effect on its viewers sought by its fictional killer, the punishment meted out to Doe's victims - taking their perceived sins to the extreme - pales in comparison to that awaiting sinners according to medieval teachings. (Inter alia, gluttons would thus be forced to eat vermin, toads and snakes, greed-mongers put in cauldrons of boiling oil and those guilty of lust smothered in fire and brimstone.) Most serial killers have decidedly more mundane motivations than Doe. And after all, this is only a movie.
Seven is a very disturbing thriller about a serial killer,John Doe(Kevin Spacey), killing people via examples of the seven deadly sins - gluttony, greed, sloth, lust, pride, envy and wrath. The story begins with Detective Mills (Brad Pitt) being assigned to Detective Somerset (Morgan Freeman). Detective Somerset is e to retire at the end of the week, and Detective Mills is moving up in the world, and is to take Somerset's place. This is a very disturbing movie. It will keep you enthralled and glued to your seat for the entire 127 minutes. Indeed, I was staggered that I never once lost concentration or was bored with this movie.This is a movie with an unexpected ending that is absolutely unpredictable and which is not at all a "Hollywood" style ending.
I saw this movie a couple times, and I liked it as a scary movie on a rainy day or whatever.... it's just that, I know too many people who take this stuff seriously. It's filled with Christian or more specifically Catholic, mythology - the seven deadly "sins" Lust, Vanity, Gluttony, Pride, Wrath, Sloth and Greed. It's basically a vigilante who goes around killing people in horrific manners as a punishment for their "sins." It has a surprise ending which was cleverly thought out more or less, but innocents suffered at this guy's hands and the plot doesn't really make sense. In no way does it make moral sense. First of all, Catholics practice child sacrifice and torture and enslave women, which does not qualify them as the best moral judges. The bible in itself is tyrannical and abusive, as well as chock full of lunacy - not the reasoned judge I'd want making decisions on my moral life that's for sure.
Also this guy does not really mete out justice. A person guilty of gluttony, sloth or vanity, does not deserve death, not even in the Catholic church and they loooove to kill and torture people. Usually, you go to confession and say a Hail Mary or two. I think the psycho in this movie was just looking for an excuse to kill people and get his pic in the paper, or whatever, and con a bunch of suckers into thinking he was some underground hero instead of what he was - a cruel psychotic, not-very-bright, jerk. Actually I have a lot of compassion for people who mess up in life, controlling the worst of your nature is difficult, most people mess up often on all counts - and Catholics can be overly critical - not to mention psychotic - about details anyway. You really have to know a person's whole life to know what they are. Maybe that guy was injured and gained weight because he couldn't move around very well, maybe the guy having sex was lonely and frightened and needed physical contact... who knows? You can't judge people on an outward, shallow look-over of their lives. If you want to help people out with their struggles for virtue why not invite the gluttony guy out to walk with you, or ask the lustful guy what intimate relationships mean to him, or why he's lonely or out of control? Maybe they're looking for help, virtue is it's own reward and all that - and lack of it is it's own justice in many ways. I think the psycho killer could've stayed at home and worked on himself, it would've worked out on it's own.