論文英語電影

『壹』 求英語電影論文

《Alexander》about it. ——《亞歷山大大帝》觀後感~

I am a student, study more onerous task to all immersed in a pile, thick book of other aspects of knowledge about nature also less. In order to broaden their horizons, when choosing courses, I usually choose some human science classes. Remember when a friend gave high school had a Greek mythology to me, that is, from the book, I see a god of the mind and I've also is the traditional Chinese religion in the image of god is completely different. Greek mythology of the gods of the people who have thoughts, feelings, and the joy of the people, sadness, jealous, have fear. But god is the Oriental religions in, or even omnipotent, is ordinary mortals cannot be achieved. But because those books and the names of the gods and long, sometimes make me confused, I eventually failed to read the book. Myth, of course, is part of the culture of the classical Greek, in order to understand with many Greek mythology, when he saw the ancient Greek culture, when elective without hesitation, I chose. Fortunately, I choose. Through a study of the semester, although no Greek culture and in-depth understanding of ancient Greece, but the experienced periods have probably know for certain period of development, the typical of the political system, cultural phenomenon also have certain knowledge, I think is good harvest. Of course, the teacher said to the final paper to write, I still feel a bit silly, I don't know what good, because although much knowledge of ancient Greece, but to really understand some of the problems one write an essay, I think my knowledge is not enough. Just recently saw "Alexander of Alexander's life", interest, but to know before Alexander, so you have to find some information, and some of the facts is mentioned below from these materials, not do annotation.
Video introction
Alexander the great was about the history of the world's first emperor Alexander conquered Eurasian of life. Alexander BC, in Macedonian king is 3.56 Philip ii, once studied Aristotle, 19 years old father was assassinated succession to the throne. He first, then pacify defeated the Persian empire, began 22,000 miles of conquest. 25 years old, Alexander had established including the Nile valley, dry peninsula and the Ins civilization across Europe in Asia, but the Alexander under age 33 because inexplicable disease die suddenly.
In this film, Alexander the great friend (Anthony Hopkins ptolemaic general) through memory, the emperor's will as life. Forty years ago, Hollywood has taken Alexander, but only about his hero. The new version, full of adventure and dream from the childhood, thrust his parents fight, then the sad for him by Aristotle and mapping lesson, graally to his invicible paving the way to conquer. This is the life of the vivid characterization.
The director of Alexander oliver stone said: "this is probably the biggest challenges in my life, hope can make it much objective." In order to do this, stone is hard. Rafer specially invited professor of the university of Oxford robin Ryan fox as the historical consultant. The fox is research of Alexander the great expert, once wrote biographies of Alexander, sales of more than 100 million copies. He accepted the invitation gladly, but a condition, is to them in the emperor's elite cavalry, and must stand in the front of the team, he "fight" for Alexander dream.
Stone has invited the ancient linguists, tries to make some of the lines to real effect. Language Fox watched the movie said after school and historical scholars should get there watching for discussion.
However, if the movie history book, it obviously lost as the value of the movie. "Alexander" in the context of history, the plot details on again. Films, Alexander's father told him: a woman more dangerous than men, as the king had hurt his lover, Mother kept his place before him, said his father. Without these details on the history, but the parents struggle was mentioned. Alexander, such as wedding night, the bride almost killed him, although not in the historical lee, but the bride was defeated by Alexander, daughter of darius, the plot and have confidence. Therefore, the writer's creation that is reasonable, no violation of history.In addition, the recent history of the new viewpoint about Alexander historiography, more and more absorbed some characters, appear very full.
A pursuit of dreams
Above has been mentioned in the film, and the understanding of Alexander before, so he is the first impression from the movie, here is to put the matter what facts. Admittedly, the film Alexander some arbitrary, even some cold, but sometimes think conversely, if no such a domineering, pride and resolute, he can become a history of Chinese strategists hoyywood hills? However, I want to discuss and not his military command art, but his pursuit of dreams and in the process which reflects personality, it is exciting and amazing. If someone was born, this man is the conqueror Alexander. As a great soldier son, Alexander had been instilled many heroism and high adventure stories. He can reel off in the early lead, read Homer in the shelter of personality and lyrics. Whether in the house or in the battlefield, he had a pillow YiLiYaTe "with him to sleep. He led his Greek soldiers and defeated the Persian empire, strong and continue to crusade. Along the way, he and his army met with human body is similar, but what we know, hair, it is a monkey. They rode on large and those of the east, the elephant who had never seen defeated the monster. Of course, though, Alexander the great personality charm, many of his soldiers to fight for Alexander has faith, but for a long time, the journey of hard driving, the warriors who still alive and tired, they obviously very to return to his country and so on the roster appeared, the army also appeared a mutiny. One section, I is very impressive, when he determined to continue to advance in India, unwilling to part soldiers, one of the important general said a touching, they finally wish is only in them to the soldiers who died superempirical essence and meet them before the meeting, the wife and children. Alexander said: "yes, you're right, I, Ross, negligence. Should I send you back as soon as possible, all pensions from me to send, respected and wealthy, love, in the rest of you will be his wife and son of a hero, finally died peacefully. But your dreams, Ross, you, the simple, early in your child's life with Persia, with gold and silver in your pockets stuffed with you when you love, because it can destroy everything in the life of a man!" , kelat rose that touching words some long, here I will not lead to, but when I'm hearing his words, I was really touched by it and feel a mortal ordinary and true feelings, in my opinion, that he was not too. Then, Alexander the retort that enthusiasm, yes, Alexander and their pursuit of something different, he pursues the sun rays, the pursuit of great, so the life of ease, money and enjoy attractive for him, he defeated the Persian empire, Babylon the great wealth, costly court life and can't baffel him to continue the expedition.
Just after the movie's feelings, then some literatures on Alexander's expedition, some of the objective a detailed analysis. According to the data, Alexander expedition, he himself has said the Persian, and had ravaged sanctuary in Greece was assassinated Philip ii, the purpose is the expedition, revenge against the Persian stronger. But the specific analysis, find the reason for the expedition is just an excuse. Firstly, the assassination of the killer waves Philip ii, paulson and no relationship with the Persian empire. O Nebuchadnezzar, paulson wave is a young aristocrat, he and Philip ii, the generals have personal in Dallas. Whatever wave, is of Nebuchadnezzar's, but he SiYuan what action, really have no direct connection with the Persian empire. Alexander said he was assassinated in Persia, Philip ii, historical records on no. Secondly, from the assassination of Nebuchadnezzar, wave, paulson to Philip ii, so the action in advance of horses prepared assassination scene, it shows that he really otherwise conspiracy. Third, revenge is only according to Greek long-standing extremely extensive mental state, as to stimulate the greeks into the slogan of the Persian.
Anyway, I think it is worth affirmation, Alexander the great dream, in order to realize its can not wealth, enjoy thier rance and courage to explore the unknown.
2 Tim HeFei and about Alexander, RON
Alexander the great films, especially sexual orientation private life a lot dispute. In fact, he HeFei and ask the relationship, and I was at the movies process has been very puzzled, why history so great a character is gay? Believe that many people have the same doubts.However, when I accidentally see teacher site of excellent assignments exploring ancient Greek young titled "love", I feel like a life. For the love of the young this phenomenon from different aspects. First is the ancient greeks aesthetic idea. Ancient Greece is extremely attractive appearance and the worship of strong and handsome figure, in this respect, they don't care, as long as the male sex "golden hair, jiongjiongweishen eyes, ruddy complexion, strong muscle, broad shoulders." He must be able to attract others' eyes and love. Beautiful young completely meet greeks aesthetic standards and, in some cases, the young beauty of man can be less attractive girl. Secondly, the ancient Greek culture condition is the root of young love. The ancient culture and modern culture and the fundamental difference between the ancients to men, women, children in the man's eyes is only the mother and the family business managers. The ancient greeks regarded the spirit of man is the center of activities, they think that the girl was not what ecation, this kind of situation is caused by a woman because ecation condition, the cultural resources, and the spirit world of ancient Greek men spirit grades. This kind of social status can appear a situation: men and women together only flirting with youth, and can be found in the heart. They are likely to rationally between the dialogue lies not only in the young, beautiful, because they have more abundant knowledge and talent. Therefore, in ancient Greece appeared a modern difficult to understand customs: every man have attracted a boy or a young man, and in close daily life as his tutor, guardian and friends, also encouraged him to study all noble character. If any man have deceived than his little boy, will be considered not perform ties of a man, No one can get to a young man of friendship is a shame for. This kind of social and cultural customs in promoting cultural and ideological progress in a little deeper, to help build social moral standards have contribution. We can not surprised to find that most firmly hold the view that homosexuality is the most important and the most influential cultural elite of ancient Greece. At this point, even the spirit of love, Socrates also no exception.
In addition, a professor of the university of Oxford robin Ryan fox in the privacy of Alexander is explained. He said, Alexander has three wives, and his mistress, four grow up together, carry the HeFei partners have homosexual relations, and the one who Persian royal eunuch very close. The fox said, many of these ancient historians recorded the plot, compared with these records could be understatement. While these sparked controversy, because of different age has different view. Ancient Greece, polygamy and homosexuality is normal, Christian Europe, strict monogamy was established, homosexuality was considered evil, so, if we use today's morality to request more than 2,000 years ago, the ancients are serious distortion.
Want to use words to summarize the feeling after see: "bravely to pursue their dreams!"

『貳』 求英語影視欣賞方面的論文

選一個角度，是些黑人人權、人性的，人性的污點； 寫女權、女性地位的，飄和desperate housewife,sex and city的對比；寫政治題材的，就很多了。24， west wing；寫科幻的、外星人、陰謀論的，x-file ,lost，fringe.

『叄』 一篇關於英語原版電影的論文

L：Are you hiding from me?
T：No.I just... I...No. No. I was just, um...I didn't want to scare you.
L：If you don't mind my asking...what are you?
T：Well, I'm a... [sighs]Well, I'm a faun. And what about you? You must be some kind of beardless dwarf?
L：I'm not a dwarf! I'm a girl! And, actually, I'm tallest in my class.
T：You mean to say that you're a Daughter of Eve?
L：Well, my mum's name is Helen.
T：Yes, but you are in fact human.
L：Yes, of course.
T：What are you doing here?
L：Well, I was hiding in the wardrobe in the spare room, and...
T：Spare room? Is that in Narnia?
L：Narnia? What's that?
T：[chuckling] Well, dear girl, you're in it. every stick and stone you see. Please allow me to introce myself.My name is Tumnus.
L：Pleased to meet you, Mr. Tumnus. I'm Lucy Pevensie.
T：- Oh, you shake it.- Uh... Why?
L：I... I don't know. People do it when they meet each other.
T：Well, then, Lucy Pevensie from the shining city of War Drobe. How would it be if you came and had tea with me?
L：Well, thank you very much, but I probably should be getting back.
T：It's only just around the corner.And there'll be a glorious fire

『肆』 跪求！！要寫英語畢業論文，想寫字幕翻譯分析的，有什麼電影電視劇介紹最好是電影，電視劇的就別那麼長

覺得可以寫一些中國特色的東西，不限於把外文翻譯成中文，可以把中國的電影翻譯成外文 ，比如一些經典的老電影什麼的，貌似現在還沒有英文翻譯，比如英雄兒女等。

『伍』 我要寫8000字的英語論文 是找一部文學作品寫好呢還是找一部電影寫好 能不能給我推薦一下文學作品或電影名

1.蘇東坡的文學背景和他的賦
SU TUNG-PO』S LITERARY BACKGROUND AND HIS PROSE-POETRY by Qian Zhongshu

(Primarily written as a foreword to 「Su Tung-Po』s Prose-poems」 translated into English With Notes and Commentaries by C. D. Le Gros Clark, this is published here by kind permission of Mr. Le Gros Clark. Those who are interested in textual criticism may consult Mr. Wu Shih-ch』ang』s review in Chinese which appeared in The Crescent Monthly, Vol. IV, No. 3. –Ed.)

Of the Sung dynasty, it may be said, as Hazlitt said of himself, that it is nothing if not critical. The Chinese people dropped something of their usual wise passiveness ring the Sung dynasty, and 「pondered, searched, probed, vexed, and criticized」. This intellectual activity, however, is not to be compared with that of the Pre-Chin period, the heyday of Chinese philosophy. The men of the Sung dynasty were inquisitive rather than speculative, filled more with a sense of curiosity than with a sense of mystery. Hence, there is no sweep, no daring, no roominess or margin in their intellectualism. A prosaic and stuffy thing theirs is, on the whole. This critical spirit revealed itself in many directions, particularly in the full flourish of literary criticism and the rise of the tao-hsüeh （道學）, that mélange altere of metaphysics, psychology, ethics and casuistry.

Literary criticism in China is an unly belated art. Apart from a handful of obiter dicta scattered here and there, Liu Hsieh』s Literary Mind （劉勰文心雕龍） and Lo Chi』s A Prose-poem on Literature （陸機文賦） are the critical writings that count up to the Sung dynasty. There is Chung Yung』s Classification of Poets (鍾嶸詩品) of course. But Chung Yung is a literary genealogist rather than a critic, and his method of simply dividing poets into sheep and goats and dispensing praise or dispraise where he thought e, is the reverse of critical, let alone his fanciful attempts to trace literary parentages(1). Ssu-Kung Tu』s Characterisations of Poetry (司空圖詩品) is a different matter(2). Ssu-Kung Tu seeks to convey purely with imagery the impressions registered by a sensitive mind of twenty four different kinds of poetry: 「pure, ornate, grotesque,」 etc. His is perhaps the earliest piece of 「impressionistic」 or 「creative criticism」 ever written if any language, so quietly ecstatic and so autonomous and self-sufficient, as it were, in its being but it fails on that very account to become sober and proper criticism. It is not until the Sung dynasty that criticism begins to be practiced in earnest. Numerous 「causeries on poetry」 （詩話）are written and principles of literature are canvassed by way of commentaries on indivial poets. Henceforth, causeries on poetry become established as the vehicle for Chinese criticism. One must note in passing that there do not appear professional critics with the rise of criticism. In those good old days of China, criticism is always the prerogative of artists themselves. The division of labour between critics and artists in the West is something that the old Chinese literati would scoff at. The criticism of Sung dynasty, like all Chinese criticismsbefore the 「New Literature Movement」 with the possible exception of Hsieh』s Literary Mind, is apt to fasten upon particulars and be given too much to the study of best words in best places. But it is symptomatic of the critical spirit, and there is an end of it.

The Chinese common reader often regards the men of the Sung dynasty as prigs. Their high seriousness and intellectual and moral squeamishness are at once irritating and amusing to the ordinary easy-going Chinese temperament. There is something paralyzing and devitalizing in their wire-drawn casuistry which inces hostile critics to attribute the collapse of the Sung dynasty to its philosophers. There is also a disingenuousness in their attempts at what may be called for want of a better name, philosophical masquerade: to dress up Taoism of Buddhism as orthodox Confucianism. One need but look into Sketches in a Villa（閱微草堂筆記）and Causeries on Poetry in a Garden（隨園詩話） to see what a good laugh these two coxcombs of letters, Chi Yuen （紀昀） and Yuan Mei （袁枚） have had at the expense of the Sung philosophers and critics respectively. Nevertheless ofe is compelled to admit that the Sung philosophers are unequalled in the study of mental chemistry. Never has human nature been subject to a more rigorous scrutiny before or since in the history of Chinese thought. For what strikes one most in the tao-hsüeh is the emphasis on self-knowledge. This constant preying upon itself of the mind is quite in the spirit of the age. The Sung philosophers are morbidly introspective, always feeling their moral pulses and floundering in their own streams of consciousness. To them, their mind verily 「 a kingdom is」. They analyse and pulverize human nature. But for that moral bias which Nietzsche thinks to be also the bane of German philosophy, their vivisection of human soul would have contributed a good deal to what Santayna calls literary psychology.

The poetry of the sung dynasty is also a case in point. It is a critical commonplace that the Sung poetry furnishes a striking contract to the T』ang poetry. Chinese poetry, hitherto ethereal and delicate, seems in the Sung dynasty to take on flesh and becomes a solid, full-blooded thing. It is more weighted with the burden of thought. Of course, it still looks light and slight enough by the side of Western poetry. But the lightness of the Sung poetry is that of an aeroplane describing graceful curves, and no longer that of a moth fluttering in the mellow twilight. In the Sung poetry one finds very little of that suggestiveness, that charm of a beautiful thing imperfectly beheld, which foreigners think characteristic of Chinese poetry in general. Instead, one meets with a great deal of naked thinking and outright speaking. It may be called 「sentimental」 in contradistinction to the T』ang poetry which is on the whole 「naïve」, to adopt Schiller』s useful antithesis. The Sung poets, however, make up for their loss in lisping naivete and lyric glow by a finesse in feeling and observation. In their descriptive poetry, they have the knack of taking the thing to be described sur le vif: witness Lo Yu (陸游) and Yang Wan-li （楊萬里）. They have also a better perception of the nuances of emotion than the T』ang poets, as can be seen particularly in their Ts』u （詞）, a species of song for which the Sung dynasty is justly famous(3). Small wonder that they are deliberate artists, considering the fact that they all have been critics in the off hours of their inspiration. The most annoying thing about them is perhaps their erudition and allusiveness which makes the enjoyment of them to a large extent the luxury of the initiated even among the Chinese. （3000字）

還有一篇在玩偶之家的身份抗爭（6000字）和一篇馬丁路德金的《我有一個夢》文體分析（10000字）
如果需要就麻煩您告訴我您的郵箱，再給您發過去。
······································

說行天下 是非常不錯的小說網站大全，你值得擁有。

『陸』 急求英美電影欣賞論文（英文的）

Men of Honor

《斯蒂文森小說精華》下卷收錄《黑箭》及《綁架》，這兩部長篇都是非常引人入勝的歷史小說。在介紹二書各自的時代背景以前，不妨讓我們先來鳥瞰一下英國歷史，它的大脈絡，那是很有趣的。

提起英國，人們只知道是個老牌帝國主義，十九世紀首先就是這匹惡狼闖進我們的家園。但是，在不列顛（聯合王國除開北愛爾蘭）那片土地（約略相當於我國湖南省）上，曾經多少次遭受外族血與火的蹂躪？多少次山河變色、國破家亡？一代又一代，有多少個入侵者、殺人兇犯，又有多少個英奸、賣國賊，最後都成了他們民族英雄和歷史偉人，我們中有幾位能夠說瞭然於胸呢？一筆一筆血淋淋的陳年舊帳，整個的英國歷史我們可以大體上概括為：三次種族大換血，三次淪為殖民地（即文化大換血或輸血），三次開門揖盜，引狼入室，認賊作父——其中兩回全國都成了我們中國的吳三桂。這就是一部英國史！

大約距今九千年以前，不列顛諸島與歐洲大陸還是連成一體的，那裡居住著中石器時代的地中海人和阿爾卑斯人。約五千年前，伊比利亞人自地中海地區西遷，是首批從大陸渡海過來的，征服了原有的居民。這次征服必定十分野蠻悲慘，使我們已經找不到任何中石器人的痕跡了。著名文化古跡索爾茲伯里平原上的怪石圈，就是伊比利亞人留下來的。是為第一次換血。

到了約兩千五百年以前，有凱爾特人自今天德國南部一路砍殺過來，先後佔領了今日法蘭西、西班牙、葡萄牙、義大利等地，接著又越海占據了不列顛諸島，殘酷屠戮伊比利亞人。是為第二次換血。

自公元一世紀中葉，羅馬帝國對不列顛進行了長達四百年的殖民統治。政府、法律和商業都使用拉丁語，只剩下鄉下人才說凱爾特話。鋪石的公路自此四通八達，繁榮城鎮星羅棋布，羅馬人還帶來了基督教，其文化、習俗、生活用品也大量滲入，整個社會生活都羅馬化了。直到五世紀初老家起火，他們才開始撤離。這是第一次被殖民地化。[ 轉自鐵血社區 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]

前門去狼，後門進虎。緊接著於五世紀中葉，原居住在西北歐的三個日耳曼野蠻部族——盎格魯、撒克遜和朱特人橫渡北海，所謂「條頓人的征服」，（嚴格地講，可以說是四次引狼入室。因為羅馬軍團撤離以後，軟弱的不列顛暴露於北方野蠻蘇格蘭人同皮克人的侵擾之下。據說首先是一位凱爾特部族領袖，主動邀請朱特人前來協辦國防的；而朱特人見有隙可乘，後來才反客為主，並引發盎格魯及撒克遜人也來大舉入侵。）耗時一百五十年。秦始皇焚書坑儒？小菜一碟！日耳曼人把凱爾特整個一個民族的成年男子幾乎打殺干凈啦（第三次換血）！他們這些劊子手構成了今天英吉利民族的主體。自然，殘留的婦孺免不了繁衍生息，於是一代又一代的混血種橫空出世。

金庸歷史小說非常有趣，其耐看不亞於斯蒂文森。然而，若按照小說中那些仁人志士伸張正義、替天行道的血性脾氣，非得要報伊比利亞人同凱爾特人，還有中石器人的血海深仇，將那些屠夫的孽種——今日的英國人，殺個精光不可！

歷三四百年七國並存（類春秋戰國）的局面，遲到九世紀初，延伸至十一世紀初，日耳曼野蠻人終於從自身各個部族紛亂稱雄之中名義上得到統一，演繹出英國統治世系的第一個朝代——撒克遜系。

就在撒克遜系統御國家的同時，九至十一世紀，來自北歐的維京海盜——其中主要是丹麥人，大規模入侵英國。他們除了在英格蘭東北部建立「丹麥區」，進行直接赤裸裸的統治之外，以後又向南方擴張。到十一世紀上半葉，雖說不斷受到盎格魯撒克遜人的反抗，仍有三十年之久，整個英格蘭都已置於了丹麥國王卡紐特統治之下 ——此三十年即英國朝廷的第二系，丹麥系。前後歷三百年，語言、文化、司法、度量衡……無不受到深深的影響。屈辱的殖民地史，居然列入了國祚的正統。

十一世紀中葉卡紐特帝國瓦解以後，政權重歸撒克遜人的手中，是謂西撒克遜系。但是新王愛德華之母卻是個諾曼底人（所謂諾曼底人本來也不是諾曼底的人，而是原居住於北歐的諾曼人，於九世紀南徙至今法國西北部、由於他們到來才稱做諾曼底的地方，安頓了下來。操法語，與法國同化了。當時受封於國王的公爵，其領地叫公國，伯爵的叫伯國。十世紀初建立了諾曼底公國，為法國封建諸侯中最強大的；名份上為法王屬下，實際有相當的獨立性），國王本人是個半撒克遜半諾曼底的雜種，他自幼在諾曼底長大，長期流亡於茲，三十八歲才回國。即位以後便大量起用諾曼底人，還跟其表弟諾曼底公爵結為聯盟，以抗衡國內的貴族，並使法語成為社會上層主要的交流工具。可謂里通外國、引狼入室之先聲。

一○六六年，那位表弟諾曼底公爵威廉，根據表哥生前有讓他繼位之願望，率兵五千乘艦隊入侵英國，打敗並殺死了新王哈羅德。英國大主教於西敏寺為之加冕，憑著聖經將英格蘭交付與之，不久他便攜著一批歸順的大主教、王孫貴族，返回諾曼底去也。勝利的法國人幾年以內不斷焚毀村莊，殺戮平民，掠奪英國貴族的土地以犒賞親屬及隨從，統治上層換成了諾曼人的天下，新貴族取代了盎格魯撒克遜的老貴族，諾曼底——法蘭西語和諾曼——法蘭西法律成了英格蘭宮廷、英格蘭貴族的語言和法律。教會也由法國來的義大利籍大主教接管了。然而，正是這位建立了諾曼底王朝的外國殖民君主同他的世子（繼位者）們，於司法制度、興建教堂乃至形成上議院、文化……等等方面諸多建樹，即是說從世俗（硬體）同靈魂（軟體）兩個方面，為社會公正奠定了基礎，開創了不朽的盛世基業，很有一點漢武帝的氣象哩！原先盎格魯撒克遜時期每個人只有一個單名，現今這樣名字後邊尾以姓氏，也是模仿他們法國貴族來的，這便是第三次殖民地化。自此以後，再也沒有外族跨海入侵、成立霸業的情事了。君主世襲制度也是從威廉肇始，故被英國人大捧特捧為「征服者威廉」，幾乎被當成我們的堯舜禹湯（真是一群厚顏無恥的亡國奴）！[ 轉自鐵血社區 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]

說起堯舜禹湯，要提一下英國朝代遞嬗的歷史，那是遲到九世紀之初，自撒克遜國王埃格伯特開端的；較之我國西周共和，要晚上一千六百多年。一千二百年以來劃為三個系、九代王朝，九朝當中還夾著一個共和政體。三系前邊已經交代過了，第一代王朝便是這位威廉一世所建立。近一百年以後，安茹（法國地名）伯爵亨利二世（威廉一世的重外孫，又是一個外國人）跑到英國來，創建了安茹（又名金雀花）王朝——試設想一下，中國歷史上若在北京建立一個約克（英地名）王朝或普瓦提埃（法地名）王朝，敝國上邦的文人們會不出來文飾一番，聽由它赤裸裸洋名字刺激自己的自尊心嗎？兩朝共歷三個半世紀之久，其中很長一段時間英國都是在法國國王的指揮棒下，讓法國人或其後裔黃袍加身，君臨英土。他們既是英國的一國之主，又在法國享有大片封地，作為法國藩鎮，法王的附庸，其實心裡只把英國當成一塊殖民地，諾曼底才是他們的老巢，他們的根。一世以下有七位帝君，他們對英國只是遙領而已，大部分時間仍舊都呆在諾曼底的，其第六位在位十年，居留英國還不及一年哩。你看清兵入關，滿人主宰天下以後，表現比他們還要好一些。盡管如此，英國人不去卧薪嘗膽，不去做伯夷叔齊，偏還要把亨利二世這個法國拐子，也看作他們歷史上最偉大的君王之一！直到十三世紀初法王將諾曼底收了回去，英國的君主這才慢慢地，開始一心一意作個名副其實的英國國王了。又過了將近兩百年，朝廷重行回復到英國血統手中，開始了蘭開斯特王朝。不過這一回殖民地亡國奴的滋味還要有得嘗，又經歷了大半個世紀，下一個約克王朝的第一任國王開始，才可以娶英國女子——而非法國女子，為王後；再又到建立都鐸王朝的國王手上，英語才取代法語成為官方語言。到十八世紀的三十年代在法庭上才廢止法語使用英語。

剩下來還有兩次值得一提。第一回在一六八九年，中國的吳三桂剛剛於十年前閉上眼睛，英國大多數宗教徒出於強烈反對天主教國王掌政，不顧不久前荷蘭海軍駛入泰晤士河奇襲英皇家艦艇的國恥（1666年6月，荷蘭海軍迅雷不及掩耳沖入泰晤士河，炮毀英國艦只無數，王家船塢付諸一炬，尤為奇恥大辱者海軍旗艦「皇家查爾斯號」竟被虜走。炮聲隆隆，倫敦震撼，實實在在預演了一場珍珠港事變），請求國王的女兒瑪麗同她的丈夫、荷蘭統治者威廉（威廉不僅是國王的女婿，還是他的親外甥）前來承繼王位。於是女兒偕同女婿率軍登陸英國，打得老豆跟老岳丈落荒而逃（當時瑪麗的胞妹安，以及她的丹麥丈夫，倒向姐姐、姐夫一邊，也背叛了老爹及泰山。後來安繼威廉三世為女王，這個忤逆不孝的女人惡有善報，極富政聲）。群臣請命：「瑪麗女王，威廉攝政，如何？」「不幹！」於是這位既有德國也有英國血統的荷蘭雜種威廉三世，英國話都說不好的，堂而皇之地坐上了龍椅（瑪麗為王後）。中國人要質問：倫理焉在，仁義何存？簡直豈有此理！可是，沿襲至今虛君實相的民主政治體制——議會高於國王、平民院高於貴族院 ——正是此時確立，兩黨制格局也自茲形成；還有大敗法王路易十四、成就英第一帝國等等功業。因此，英國人把這次不怎麼流血的外戚入侵、大家都當亡國奴，十分自豪地稱之為「光榮革命」，看得比中國人心目中的唐宗宋祖，還要高出許多頭哩。

第二回是在二十五年以後，安女王仙逝無嗣，同樣出於英國國教對天主教的排斥，遵照國會法案，舉國迎接女王的表兄弟、德國番佬、漢諾威公爵喬治登基，稱喬治一世。根本不會說英語，又在德國土生土長的他（其太子，後來繼位的國王也一樣），開始了史書上倒數第二個王朝，那又是一個以外國地名命名的王朝！此王朝繁演了一百多年，傳到了維多利亞。嘩，這位十八歲少女直到白發蒼蒼八十二歲老太太，金鑾殿上龍椅一坐就是六十四年，比咱們康熙老皇帝還要長哇！可這個維多利亞不也是個雜種嗎，原來她的母親本是德意志一個小公國的寡婦，後來嫁到了英國王室。女王從小就在日耳曼人的教養下長大，母語說德語，英語一輩子也說得不地道。登基三年後又嫁給她所狂熱崇拜的一位母系的表弟——不消說，那是個純種日耳曼，狼子野心、非我族類無疑的嘍！此後更加封親王，倚之為左右手，批閱公文，干預朝政，（嗚呼，大權旁落，一至於斯！）然而天哪，正是這一對野夫婦，文治武功，創造出英國歷史上最輝煌的黃金時代！中國的中山路、中山堂、中山大、中山醫科大……已經夠多的啦，而以她維多利亞命名的，更遍及英、加、澳、亞、非諸多地域，還要多得多啊。英國人拿勝利、勇氣、恆心、真理、母性、正義、科學與文藝、和平與進步……幾乎所有想得到的頌辭，都奉獻給了她，親王也同樣地世世代代倍受尊崇。你們瞧這個國民有多賤！其實，維多利亞的意義不僅限於英國。十八世紀，世界文明的重心在巴黎；十九世紀三十年代以後，即進入維多利亞時代，世界文明的重心到了倫敦。

以上這一類故事並不僅限於英國。我們知道古代日耳曼本是一個游牧民族，精壯男子去外邊打仗，不斷奪取新的土地，然後整個部落，男女老少，不斷地易地遷居。他們極其重視榮譽，而這種榮譽是建立在比狠斗勇上邊，認為掠奪、流血得來的財物，遠比誠實勞動——流汗得來的光榮。所以打仗——掠奪，便成了生活的至高目的。為了搶劫不惜殺身成仁，捨生取義，血流成河，何等的悲壯！公元前一○二年，二十萬條頓人於今法國馬賽附近幾乎全數被殲，死屍之多，居民不得不用白骨去砌葡萄園的藩籬。次年另一支日耳曼人在義大利北部犧牲更為慘烈，不單男人個個戰死不屈，婦女們也成群先殺死自己的孩子，然後自刎。而歐洲人脈管中涌動著的，正是古羅馬人（也是好戰的種族）和古日耳曼人的血液！由此我們得知，如同漢民族這樣死守著東亞一大片腹地，老子說「夫唯兵者不詳之器」，墨子主張「非攻」，勤勤懇懇地從事農耕；三千年來各種民族成份無太大變動地延續了下來，雖足堪自豪，卻並非世界人類史的唯一模式。

固然，王室皇族之間跨國互通嫁娶在歐洲的歷史中據有特殊的地位，甚至曾經與民族國家之逐步形成同步進行，這一點本來同中國不大相同。即便是如此，從以上我們仍然可以得知，英國人是把宗教信仰、經濟、政治的現實利益，以及實際政績，看得高於抽象的民族感情的。所以像漢族這樣，將對民族的忠貞當作超乎一切最高的價值標准，不惜擲頭顱灑熱血，赴湯蹈火；譬如從明末無數忠義之士壯烈殉國，清初到處反清復明，直鬧到秋瑾，乃至孫中山還要靠黑社會排滿起家，並不是人類文明史惟一的模式。

中國村只是地球上的一個角落，行善的人喜歡說「將心比心」，將心比心無疑是非常之好的；但是若認為鄰村的善惡標准、價值取向，也應當同自己的一模一樣，那便要謬誤千里了。今天，跨在廿一世紀門檻上的我國青少年理應知己知彼，對這個多元的世界，對其他各個國家不同的歷史，有更多的了解，具更博大的眼光，更寬闊的胸懷，以便當一個不至於丟人現眼的地球公民。愛國主義源於普遍的人性，民族沙文主義則要不得。

歷史家皮名舉有言「不學本國史不知道中國的偉大，不學西洋史不知道中國的落後」。信哉！

『柒』 英語論文題目：英語學習與電影的關系。幫忙想一下題目，謝謝，專業人士幫忙！

電影欣賞與英語學習，看電影學英語，美劇與英語學習，電影之於大學英語學習，
論英語原聲電影在英語學習中的作用，從欣賞英語原版電影談高中生的英語學習

『捌』 高分 英語論文 電影

來看看我們群主寫的<傲慢與偏見>吧!!
http://group.qq.com/group_index.html?groupid=22493817

『玖』 哪些電影可以拿來寫英語論文

《冰雪奇緣》、暮光之城、貧民窟的百萬富翁。其實具體要看你寫什麼方向，如果翻譯方向，任何一個國外的電影都可以用來分析。

『拾』 英語電影欣賞論文(中文的）一千五百字以上的

每周兩部電影的生活過去了,選修課結課了,老師還不錯,交一篇英文看後感就行,總結這一門課,確實看了不少電影,其中我比較喜歡的有<<兵臨城下>>(神奇狙擊手戰爭與愛情的交織)<<諾丁山>>(Notting Hill)(一個普通市民與好萊塢女明星的愛情故事）<<當幸福來敲門>>(我的論文就寫的關於他的)<<海上鋼琴師》（一個沒上過岸，不懂樂譜卻擁有非凡音樂才華的人的故事）《軍火之王》（通過描寫軍火商反戰）。

最後我寫了一篇《當幸福來敲門》的看後感，Will Smith主演，由真人真事改編。全文如下，第一次寫如此長的English，寫完又列印出來。裡面肯定還有一些錯誤，如果有人閑著無聊，可以溜幾眼，或許對你日後學習英語的信心有幫助。

After seeing the film」The Pursuit Of Happiness」，I』m deeply involved in the thought of life．We live in a big world including the rich and the poor，the optimist and the pessimist．What about you? Do you feel fulfilled? Have you ever made a plan for the happy life? The film supplies us with a man answering them.

Many years ago, a view occupied me that life must be spent in enjoy. But now, especially from seeing the film, my thoughts are changed. Life is not only to enjoy what you have, but also to run after what you haven』t. At the beginning of the film, Chris Gardner can be regarded as a fail. He has no money to rent a place to live in, and his wife departs from him. He and his little son even choose a toilet as a shelter for the nights. But the man never loses the mind to struggle for a happy life; even if he loses his temper when he fights for a sleeping place the governors applies. It』s the spirits to overcome the difficulties that shocks me.

Life is like a box of chocolates and you never know what you are goanna got. But if you are working hard with a expectant heart, you will get a satisfactory consequence. So, I think, everyone must have a dream. A dream isn』t the one that you make every night or like a daydream. It』s the one that you can realize in many years. It may be that I』ll possess a big fortune, or I want to be a famous writer and so on. In a word, you must have a goal, which lets you make progresses constantly.

Actually, the most important work is not having a goal but how to stick to it. Most people haven』t a determination to finish what they have promised. What for? I think there are two reasons for it. First, the goal is too big to complete it. You should make a appropriate goal, which it is more likely to realize. Second, you haven』t a reasonable plan for your goals. You『d better make it carefully. For instance, as a college student, you want to get a good job after graation. So your four years』 plan should be made. In first year, your English should reach a certain level. In second year, you want to get a scholarship. In third year, you join in many associations to communicate with different people. In fourth year, you take a part-time job to realize the society. In fact, your plan should be more complicated. Because the college is a long time and you can achieve lots of things ring this time.

Besides what I say above, another point is that you know what you are interested in. You may think it over before you have a try. Someone says that, the interest is the best teacher. The only thing to confine you in the work is the interest.

Nothing is impossible. You never know what you will become in the future. The man in the film finally becomes a very rich man. This is so pleasant and admiring, but we should take it for granted. Chris Gardner has done much for it. No pain, no gain. He has suffered from many pains. His wife leaves him and his son alone. He is anxious about the sleeping place every night and sells a expensive machine to support his life. In order to get through the exam, he learns all over the night and still work in the day. He is so busy that he has no time to call for damages when he was crashed by a car. Fortunately, he finally succeeds.

As a student, we should seize on the expensive time. Let』s begin from now on.

In the old time, the man that was full of encouragement in the war was respectful, and they were called hero. However, you can』t become that kind of man in this peace world. But if you have a remarkable skill, which nobody can match, you also can be a hero. It』s another kind of hero. Maybe the later one is more difficult to become. What you need isn』t the only thing---encouragement. In a word, you will make what you are, and you control yourself in the future.