辛德勒電影觀後感英文

㈠ 求《辛德勒的名單》英文評價

It ("Schindler's list") has profoundly exposed the German Fascist massacre of the Jews of terrorist crimes, and has a very high artistic, the seriousness of its ideology and extraordinary artistic expression has reached almost insurmountable depth. We awarded the Oscar prize for the film, which is deserved. And Stephen Spielberg also won the Oscar Award for the first time, for his talent, this is a must for being late.
-- the sixty-sixth Oscar prize jury
"Schindler's list" has a review of the history, the development of the art of meditation, I urgently ask you to see the film.
- former U.S. President Clinton

望採納 謝謝

㈡ 求有能力的高人幫寫電影辛德勒名單的觀後感，必須是用英文寫,詞數在不低於150.謝謝。

I've heard of Schindler's List as a classic,epic movie and a big oscar winner long before,but it's only after seen it myself have I truely understood its value to a man.
Honestly, I didn't really intend to see this movie cause I thought it's good though, but not my cup of tea. I thougt it would be too serious, the topic—WW2 and Jewish Holocaust were too grave to me, but these notion just swept off my mind right after I started enjoying it.
Suprisingly, the first half was not serious at all, on the contrary, it's rather interesting, very hollywood. It tells about how Mr. schindler earned his worth and fame in that time of turbulence,and he brags about his secret—war—to his wife.
But, as the plot goes deeper, it gripped me completely. I did knew one thing or two about dark history that jewish had undergone, but never expected it would be this inhuman,this...devil. The movie didn't exaggerate, just present us the actual scene—how people were dragged out from their home; how they were stripped naked, being driven into the gas chamber; how they were executed causally...
When the only coloured figure appears—a girl in red, poor little creature, this is the moment which striked Schindler's heart strongly and so the audience, from that moment the hero of the movie turns to be a real one, and from that moment the last piece of puzzle was put on, from then on the movie was truely complete,it become a immortal masterpiece.
So now,if any one asked me how about this movie,I would say it's just perfect, how? I really can't tell you, just see it. I won't raise any example, exactly which parts are memorable and worth talking about cause there are so many.Oh it's still live in my head the moment Ben Kingsley crumpled a fake certification and used that to deceived one of his friend through the Nazi checkpoint, he pretended to blame his friend, how careless you are, you forget your paper, what a wit.
So really, I don't think I can give you any comment about this movie, I'm out of words, and I think it's a movie not to be talked but to be watched. Watch it, and you'll know even in that age of total chaos, where the whole nation goes crazy and irrational, there would still be someone keep their conscience and do what is right.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing, Edmund Bruke said, these's the only words I came up with after finishing this movie, still I can't tell how come, just watch it and you'll never regret.

㈢ 如何評價電影《辛德勒的名單（Schindler』s List）》

電影《辛德勒的名單《辛德勒的名單》評價：情節感人，氣勢悲壯，而以黑白攝影為主調的紀錄片式的拍攝手法更使該片具有了一種真實的效果，感人肺腑，發人深思。

當該片進行到最後，人們獲得自由時，銀幕上驟然間大放光明，出現了燦爛的彩色。這一明顯的電影語言技巧的運用，給該片起到了很好的效果。由壓抑陰沉的黑白兩色到豐富的自然色彩，形象地盡顯了人們解除死亡危險，重獲自由後的開朗心情。

《辛德勒的名單》一片將作為電影史上永恆的光輝而存在，它是電影史上一部經典的作品。斯蒂芬·斯皮爾伯格的名字也將與這部影片聯系在一起而永遠流傳下去。

《辛德勒的名單》成為全球最矚目的影片，其思想的嚴肅性和非凡的藝術表現氣質都達到了幾乎令人難以超越的深度。

演員選擇：

選角初期，連姆·尼森就參加了辛德勒角色的試鏡，1992年12月，在看過他在百老匯舞台劇《安娜·克里斯蒂》中的表演後，斯皮爾伯格認定他是扮演辛德勒的最終人選。

為了幫助尼森准備角色，斯皮爾伯格讓他研究了兄弟華納公司總裁史蒂夫·羅斯的錄像帶，斯皮爾伯格一直認為羅斯的氣質與辛德勒如出一轍。

拉爾夫·費因斯憑借他在《一個危險的男人：阿拉伯後的勞倫斯》和《新呼嘯山莊》的表演得到了軍官阿蒙·戈斯的角色，斯皮爾伯格是這樣評價費因斯的：「我見到了一個性感的魔鬼。他的表演非常微妙，你會從他眼中發現仁慈的瞬間，但隨即又會變為陰冷。」

為了演好這個角色，費因斯不僅增重28磅，而且還觀看了新聞影片並請教了認識其飾演角色的人，從而演繹出形神兼備的魔頭。當一位經歷過所有事件的倖存者看到身著軍服的費因斯時，竟然被嚇得渾身顫抖。

㈣ 電影辛德勒名單的觀後感

辛德勒名單是關於納粹屠猶題材的經典之作。在這部影片中，既揭示了軍火商、納粹分子奧斯卡·辛德勒由邪惡走向正義，回歸人性，盡其所能營救猶太人的事跡，也從正面或側面反映出了反派人物——阿蒙·高斯從一個常人墮落為殺人機器的復雜過程。高斯這個人物的蛻變給我帶來的沖擊，並不亞於辛德勒。所以我覺得，解析高斯，對我們理解這部影片，乃至這個時代，都有重要意義。
盡管沒有明確交代，但從一些情節和對話來看，高斯是維也納人。奧地利直到1938年才被德國吞並。在此之前，高斯會是怎樣的一個人呢？我想，大概也與常人無異吧。
後來他成為了黨衛軍中校，主管克拉科夫的集中營。一方面，他保持著自己作為「人」的本性——有愛情，貪財（雖然不是好品質，但卻是人性的重要組成部分），嗜酒，能為辛德勒說情。他喜歡海倫，卻因為她是猶太人而不敢明確表示，只能把他安排在無生命危險的家中。當辛德勒試圖挽救猶太人的時候，正是抓住了這一點，作為突破口，才說動了高斯。
但另一方面，他的「獸性」逐漸膨脹，占據了主導。他奉上司之命大肆屠殺克拉科夫的猶太人。如果說這還只是奉命行事的話，那麼他在別墅里肆意槍殺猶太人，恐怕不是為了錢、名，也不是受人所迫或受人指使，也不見得真的和猶太人有什麼八輩子的大仇，只是為了「好玩」。辛德勒勸他像皇帝那樣寬恕人，高斯就擺出一幅皇帝的架子。這只是為了「好玩」，而不是真的像寬恕他們。當他覺得不好玩的時候，又毫不猶豫地恢復了劊子手的本來面貌。
這一切如何造成？納粹的灌輸無疑十分重要；但人有殘忍的本性，當這種本性受諸如命令，或殺人場面的刺激，同時又缺少引導與制約時，就會一發而不可收拾，逐漸替代善良的一面，而變成一個徹頭徹尾的魔鬼。這是歷史的悲劇。
高斯是數百萬納粹軍人的縮影。他們都是由凡人、好人淪為野獸的。高斯的悲劇也是數百萬普通納粹的悲劇，更是猶太人、是全人類的悲劇。如何防止這種悲劇重演？這是一個值得思考的問題。

㈤ 辛德勒的名單英語觀後感簡單的

Schindler's list, director in structural characters of the jews, schindler's main body, the same has said, if chien is a Jew, or is such a common Germanic nationality people, so that even the great redemption, but can not improve a class. This task is set to schindler's background, a nation, and the rich high social status, as is known to all, when imperial German jewish is to hold the concept 「discriminatory attitude, whether in alts or children has entrenched. While such a role, as design Germanic festival of society, the jews to the businessman, as the great redemption and rise again a class. This design is the director of the movie play for greater influence significance is more outstanding, is also the good rendering. This is a very accurate can show the director of social background, he is very important.

Entrenched ideas, must be the discrimination distorted manufacturing opinion to instill, children are a white paper, most people will attend the political empire. The true facts, and upper staff know only by the imperial German is for the public trust, the top spread, people subconsciously generated for jewish discrimination graally. When the alts proce thoughts, nature would transmit to the children, and the children's mind is not mature, to identify the ability is bad, very easily subconsciously proced this thought. This is the opinion of distortion of cadres, also as transmission in domestic propaganda fascist Japan, make public basic support of so-called 」jihad「 foreign expansion of war. The spread of the distortion of public opinion is terrible, it can completely eroded people thought that people cannot distinguish the spread of this opinion on the nose. As the nation's film sino-japanese children in the snow, take dirty stones to throw the jews, and forced out chanting go, jewish guy. If no such opinion, children's ideology of ethnic differences have no the rivalry between the two. The thought of the culprit is the person that distorted opinion.

The film redeemed reflected in his salvation in the rescue and rescue, no obvious, but he saved but is outstanding. In fact he saved is the important link of the rescue. After the war, many defeated fascism is to be handed over by the military courts as ever, schindler sanctions in close cooperation with the Nazi guard, who will save face sanctions, but here, saved the reflect the signature is saved schindler. Do one thing at a time, start may damage, and then some of his own interest income is probably not think of themselves, save others, the condition is saved himself. Absolutely everyone is mutual, nationality and race, this save in his salvation is appeared after.

In total can stimulate the slaughter of the weak, and not redeem the jews of sympathy, but the first chance to have compassion will try to salvation. When the rulers of the people, when the slaughter unilaterally people without any resistance, is strong and the weak, belong to the rivalry between the poles. In this not unfair, often can cause to the weak against outsiders proce sympathy. In such a sympathy, will be in the circumstance of thinking of redemption. Premise is that people need to have compassion. It is to cast, and slaughter victims. The killing has been endless slaughter blind, can no longer proce compassion, rooted in the thought that they have told the subconscious life as if the victim CaoGai generally. This is a period of history, can not have similar things, will power by outsiders to redeem the impotent victims. So the jews and not accidental redemption.

If a race, they face annihilation, only will capitulate blindly, not resist, waiting for their only will be destroyed. In the subconsciousness, some people have their resistance is meaningless. Because of the suffering will not stop killing, and not against the opposite effect. Always thought that the massacre is weak. In the film the jews in a narrow quarantined for the local area, they are satisfied, because no party guard, but they really dead. Very accord with the age of the jews were slaughtered. Precisely because the psychological lost souls. At the situation, without a fight against the only accept death, waiting in line, under the strong spirit, not in themselves by destroying the spirit form self-rescue consciousness, merely a mare merecfil to slaughter, with such a thought, is ultimately not perish from the reality.

自己簡略一下。

㈥ 求《辛德勒的名單》的英文影評，越詳細越好，謝！

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

The Holocaust is undoubtedly one of the most significant and horrifying events of the twentieth century. Between 1938 and 1945, the Jewish population was segregated and persecuted, culminating in the merciless slaughter of approximately six million Jews (this figure is quoted in the film, though most historical estimates vary between five and seven million). Amidst all this butchery, one man decided to make a difference, famously saving the lives of more than 1100 Jews- men, women and children who would otherwise have been killed.

Oskar Schindler (played brilliantly by Liam Neeson, "Batman Begins") was a Sudeten German instrialist, a wealthy womanizer who wasn't afraid to throw his money around. Always bearing his Nazi Party badge proudly, Schindler would often frequent nightclubs, extravagantly showering high-ranked Nazi officers and their girlfriends with champagne and caviar. With impeccable connections in the black-market, there was little that he couldn't get his hands on, and he was a good person to know. Buying friends was something that Schindler could do well, and he would often use these newfound alliances to aid his own business ventures. When thousands of the Polish Jew population was relegated to the Kraków Ghetto in 1941, Schindler saw an opportunity for further success, enlisting desperate Jewish investors and employing Jewish workers (who were substantially cheaper to employ) to open an enamelware factory. His connections in high places ensured lucrative army contracts, and Schindler need only have watched as his personal fortune grew, despite doing little to run the company beyond offering it "a certain panache."

It is clear from the beginning that Oskar Schindler does not harbour any racial prejudices. When Schindler requests the services of Itzhak Stern (a superb Ben Kingsley, "Gandhi"), a clever, humanitarian Jewish accountant, Stern declares that, "By law I have to tell you, sir, I'm a Jew." "Well, I'm a German, so there we are," replies Schindler indifferently, before getting straight to business. It is not race that he is concerned with, it is himself… and, of course, his money. Stern does not enjoy running Schindler's business, and he initially acquires little satisfaction from it. When Schindler attempts to convey his genuine gratitude for his profitable services with a glass of whiskey, Stern absentmindedly refuses to drink it, and an embittered Schindler drinks it himself before ordering Stern to leave.

With the arrival of Amon Goeth (played as the epitome of evil by Ralph Fiennes, "Red Dragon"), a Hauptsturmführer of the SS, the hopeless plight of the Jews grows darker. In a harrowing extended sequence, largely based on the testimonies of Holocaust survivors, the Jews are mercilessly "liquidated" from the Krakow Ghetto, many simply shot on the spot. "Today is history," proclaims Goeth. "Today will be remembered. Years from now the young will ask with wonder about this day. Today is history and you are part of it…. For six centuries there has been a Jewish Krakow. By this evening those six centuries will be a rumor. They never happened. Today is history."

This sequence also marks the celebrated appearance of the little girl in the red coat. An ingenious plot device, the character was based upon a real girl named Roma Ligocka who, unlike her film counterpart, survived the war, and wrote a memoir entitled "The Girl in the Red Coat: A Memoir". The embodiment of innocence, Schindler spots the small girl wandering amongst the black-and-white chaos of the Krakow Ghetto, and we follow her as she retreats into a building and takes shelter under a bed. When Schindler later notices her disheveled corpse carted past him to be incinerated, he is understandably horrified, unable to understand how the soldiers could possibly destroy something so innocent. This event memorably signifies the turning-point of Schindler's attitudes towards the carnage, fuelling his desire to save as many Jews as possible.

Long known as a "blockbuster" filmmaker – with such adventure classics as "Jaws," "E.T. The Extra Terrestrial" and "Raiders of the Lost Ark" to his name - "Schindler's List" was - and remains - Steven Spielberg's most mature directorial effort. Working with a screenplay that Steven Zaillian adapted from Thomas Keneally's Booker Prize-winning 'Schindler's Ark,' Spielberg treats the subject matter with the respect it deserves. Wisely choosing to depict the events as realistically as possible, Spielberg allows the images to speak for themselves. Flawless acting, stunning cinematography and a haunting John Williams score excel this film above all others of the 1990s. This is the powerful story of the difference that just one man can make, and it is a story that deserves to be seen by all. We can only feel grateful that it was Steven Spielberg who chose to be at the helm.

=========================

Rather than impress you (the reader) with a grandeur review of the movie, I will sum up what the people are saying about this movie called Schindler's List.

It's brilliant, beautifully shot in black and white, but it's a Spielberg film, it did have it's share of flaws.

Despite the many rants from other users saying that "if it's Spielberg, it mustn't be that good," I still can't understand why people would rate this film with the lowest rating possible(1 out of 10, which = awful movie).

I rated this film a 10 out of 10. Why? "Now come on, Dude, it's a Hollywood Movie" I was told by a fellow student in school. Yes, but when was the last time any Hollywood made a movie like this? When was the last time you saw a Hollywood Movie that was actually worth watching for 3 whole hours? I appreciate that any kind of film that is anything as dramatic as this can actually get made in Hollywood today, let alone get made way back in 1993. I find this film great for the fact that this doesn't stick to every Hollywood stereotype, cliche, bullsh**, and lie that seems to fill most Hollywood Movies.

Flaws. Let's face it, pretty much every film has them, even a huge movie loving geek like myself knows that. Yes, the ending is a bit pretentious(but I felt that the ending for Saving Private Ryan was a bit pretentious too, though I still think that it's also an excellent film). Having seen this a few times already I can see where the arguments over the character lacking enough depth and being rather 2-dimensional have some truth in them.

Schindler's List, like any other film, has flaws. Truth is that any film, whether it be directed by Kubrick, Stone, Tarantino, Malick, or Spielberg, will most likely have flaws no matter how noticeable or unnoticeable they are.

What I feel after several viewings. Despite the films flaws, it stands out as a very moving, well-intentioned, strong, excellent, and remarkable film. See if you want to, nobody is forcing you to see this movie. I, like many others who haven't fallen into the "Everything that is Spielberg sucks" crowd, can't deny what a powerful film this is and what a great contribution to movie cinema history it is.

===========================

Many people have told me how devastated they were when they saw this movie. But I was just bored. We talked about it and, in the discussions that followed, I was accused of not caring about the victims of the Holocaust. One person even said I was denying the Holocaust happened!

And that soured me on the movie even more. The fact is, Holocaust movies have insurance against criticism: if you say the movie is a waste of time, someone might attribute your opinion to the Holocaust itself. I don't understand it, but that weird emotional blackmail made me really uncomfortable with Schindler's List.

I thought Liam Neeson was horrible. His acting is very stiff and unconvincing. The use of hand-held cameras and black-and-white cinematography *should* work, but ultimately they amounted to subtle special effects.

I thought the movie was emotionally flat, as well. I watched each character go through the motions, wondering when something unexpected would happen. The horror of the Holocaust is shown in an almost clinical way.

I don't know. I just felt that this movie would feel less like a bid for an Oscar and more like a personal film.

At the risk of being a complete jerk, I'll give Spielberg this advice: Do it again. Make another Holocaust movie. Why not? He finished Kubrick's "AI." Kubrick had another movie in the planning stages, a Holocaust film called "Aryan Papers" (aka "Wartime Lies"). I hope he'll finish *that* Kubrick movie, too, and create a better Holocaust film, something I can sink into and be surprised by, something that feels much more personal.

=======================

I mean, has enough time passed? Or has the release of *Schindler's List* on DVD fueled a new hushed awe towards the picture?

Spielberg's critic-proof Holocaust film has several problems, the biggest of which is the way it turns a horrible real-life tragedy into a three-hanky melodrama. I continue to maintain that the Holocaust is generally unfilmable, in terms of what we might call a standard movie. Generally unfilmable, but not inevitably unfilmable. Off the top of my head, I can recommend two recent films on this subject: Francesco Rosi's *The Truce*, and Costa-Gavras' *Amen". Both films approach this material with far more nuance than Spielberg's film, which, I repeat, is weepy melodrama. (And as such, treads a fine line between reverence and tastelessness.) For that matter, Polanski's *The Pianist* gives us a more unique approach than what we get here, which is a movie that features a hero whom your average American multiplex popcorn-tub-muncher can easily identify with: a gregarious capitalist named Oskar Schindler (Liam Neeson) who, despite all the war-profiteering (read: "initiative"), turns out to have a heart of gold. Or marshmallow mush. Please don't bother pointing out that this is a "true story": those who've read the actual book by Thomas Kenneally on which the movie is based will be rather shocked by the movie's willingness to sacrifice verisimilitude for "dramatic license". The biggest example of this is the "villain" of the piece, SS-Kommandant Amon Goeth (Ralph Fiennes in a career-making performance). The screenplay ladles all sorts of Freudian syrup over this character, meaning: he's crazy as a loon. So much for the "banality of evil": instead, we get, via Fiennes' Method-y performance, a study in mere neurosis instead of a rigorous examination of the murderous pathology that's inherent in humanity. Spielberg can't resist having Herr Goeth develop a crush on one of his Jewish housemaids, and we get the requisite "Hath not a Jew eyes" speech, delivered with what is supposed to be irony by Fiennes. Then he beats the crap out of her. Change the plot particulars, and you've got your standard "Lifetime Channel" movie about an abusive husband.

Don't get me wrong, the film is not a total waste of time: even melodrama has cumulative virtues, and many of the scenes in *Schindler's List* are quite affecting, particularly the very last sequence in which the surviving "Schindler Jews" appear (in color), accompanied by the actors who portrayed them. They pay tribute to Schindler by laying stones on his grave. Moving stuff. Ben Kingsley, who portrays the worry-wart Itzhak Stern, must also receive special mention. And Spielberg's technical mastery is never open to question: this is one beautifully mounted film, impeccably photographed. The set-design, which is called upon to perform the daunting task of replicating Nazi labor camps and so forth, is beyond reproach. Proving that he's still the same guy who directed *Jaws*, Spielberg is able to send chills up our spines when a train full of Jewish women & girls is accidentally routed to Auschwitz: it's a night-scene, replete with a light-tower that approximates a beacon from Hell.

But, all-in-all, the movie remains an elementary approach to the Holocaust genre. It's tailor-made for desultory viewings by 12th-graders: "Hey mom, we learned about the Holocaust in class today." Nothing wrong with that, but aren't the kids better served by a FACTUAL documentary about this subject, rather than an Oscar-ted exercise in self-importance? You decide.

=======================

已經盡量找了四篇比較長的影評了,希望樓主能滿意.

㈦ 看《辛德勒的名單》觀後感5篇影評

《辛德勒的名單》讓我們切身體會到了戰爭的恐怖。我為大家帶來幾篇《辛德勒的名單》觀後感供大家閱讀。下面是我為你們整理的內容，希望你們喜歡。

《辛德勒的名單》觀後感一

影片取材於一個真實的故事，講述了二戰期間納粹德國大規模奴役屠殺猶太人的一段沉重的歷史。

當猶太人被趕往猶太區時，街頭的納粹人高聲喊：「快滾吧!該死的猶太人!」透過黑白的影片，我看到那些猶太孩子眼中的光漸漸黯淡，他們知道等待他們的將是無盡的苦難與折磨。我不敢想像，他們都還那麼小，心中的憧憬與對美好的嚮往就這樣被蹂躪;就像這黑白的畫面，壓抑得令人窒息。納粹對猶太人的黑暗統治使猶太人徹底成了他們的奴隸。廉價的勞役成了猶太人生存的唯一選擇。後來，電影中出現了一個人物——戈特，他把屠殺猶太人當成樂趣，在他的眼中看不到任何憐憫與寬恕，他僅存的只有拒絕、殺戮和無法言語的暴戾。

我仍記得他的猶太女傭海倫說：「我捉摸不透他的喜怒哀樂，我不敢靠近他，我感覺他隨時都可能殺了我。」我還記得她眼睛裡噙滿淚水，恐懼的眼神與抖動的身軀如暴風雨般滌盪著我的內心……

令我印象最深的是在一群逃難猶太人中的一位身著紅色大衣的小女孩，她是這部影片中唯一一抹鮮紅色，她天真無邪，活潑可愛，蹦蹦跳跳尋找著避難的地方，這一幕恰巧被辛德勒看到了，或許是被紅衣女孩所震撼，他的目光久久不肯離開。女孩在一個沙發底下藏身，她悄悄的趴著，露出笑容。可看到這里的我心卻如刀割一般痛，她多像一個天使!可混然不知惡魔的魔掌終會伸向她。後來，當紅衣女孩再次出現時，是在運屍車上，她的紅色大衣依然很鮮艷，可那已不再是希望了，而是我們心口的一顆硃砂痣。

電影的主人公辛德勒出生於一個富裕的德裔家庭，家境優渥，懂得享受美好生活。後因經濟大蕭條家道中落，來到克拉科夫尋找發財機會，交際手段高明，能言善道，靠敲詐勒索，讓猶太富商給他投資;長袖善舞，靠賄賂德國軍官取得官方合約。空手套白狼，短短的時間之內從兩手空空發展成了大富翁以及軍方的好朋友。他的本意是發財，隨著故事情節的發展，讓他親眼目睹了納粹黨人的殘酷暴行，看到了猶太人被肆意作文http://Www.ZuoWenWang.Net/地踐踏和殺戮，他沒有選擇冷漠和逃避，而是巧妙地出手相助。他用高超的交際手腕買通軍方，讓猶太人到工廠來做工，讓他們短暫逃離集中營的地獄;找個測試消防水管的借口，給火車內飢渴的猶太人帶去生命之水;安慰悲苦絕望的女傭;勸告殺戮成性的軍官用寬恕的管理方式;最後鑄就了閃耀人性光輝的名單。不惜散盡錢財，置自身於危險，保護素昧平生的猶太人。人性的光輝在他身上層層釋放。

「一流的智慧總是自相矛盾的」在辛德勒身上完美展現，他既自私自利、縱情聲色犬馬，又堅守善良的道德底線，彰顯人性的光輝，這是一個真實的人，完美的人。他不是傳統意義上的三好學生，但在關鍵時刻選擇了做沒有惠及個人利益，但卻正確的事情。

戰爭，能揭露一個人的丑惡嘴臉，也能展現一個人閃光的一面。辛德勒在看到猶太人的慘狀後，用自己的大部分財產換取猶太人的命，他的名單上列印著一千一百多個人的名字，這不僅是名單，更是一個個鮮活的生命!辛德勒舍棄了很多東西，卻保護了一群生命，一個民族!

在猶太人成為自由民時，他們用唯一的金子為辛德勒做了一枚戒指，上面刻著：「當你拯救了一個人，就等於救了一個世界。」

這是辛德勒對自己的救贖，他的善行使一千多個人得以生存。想必，這是人性的光輝，是我看到的在這部影片中納粹人的唯一閃耀的光芒。我時常想，假如我是辛德勒，我會傾其所有拯救猶太人嗎?假如我是戈特，我會殘忍無情地屠殺他們嗎?又或者我是那個時期的猶太人，我是否能忍受避難時躲在糞坑裡?是否能不懼怕死亡?我該怎麼生存，又該怎麼死去。我無法知道，因為我的懦弱，因為我沒有勇氣去面對，更不知道該如何選擇。所以，我只能當一個旁觀者，為辛德勒的光輝贊頌。為戈特的殘忍而憤怒，為無辜遇難的猶太人而惋惜，為倖存的猶太人祝福。

時至今日，難忘的是那份厚重的名單，更歷歷在目的是黑白畫面中穿梭在人群中的紅衣女孩，她是最熾熱的火焰，也是人們心中最灰暗的角落。

《辛德勒的名單》觀後感二

《辛德勒名單》真實的再現了德國企業家奧斯卡。

辛德勒在第二次世界大戰期間保護1200名猶太人免法西斯殺害的，真實的歷史事件。

影片開始，猶太人圍立桌旁衷情聖詠的心聲是傳統的祈禱儀式，搖曳閃動、集束不定的燭光隨著合聲的減弱漸漸被黑色吞沒。

影片由彩色切換為黑白兩色的畫面。

貫穿影片始終的凄慘哀惋的小提琴獨奏和幾近無伴奏的混聲合唱給出的強弱和諧依然不失聖詠的曲式，一位小女孩衣裙上的紅色亮點短暫的跳動給出的生命色彩仍然不忘立虹為記的永約。

影片結尾處伸開的地平線上，聖詠的基調展開世俗的旋律擁過來黑壓壓的一群人，畫面果斷地轉為彩色的鮮艷，橫掃一切的光明，「我使雲彩蓋地的時候，必有虹現在雲彩中，讓世界五顏六色。

」

或許在開始的時候，奧斯卡。

辛德勒並不是為了救猶太人而開設工廠的，因為畢竟他是一個商人，一個精明發戰爭財的人，他選取猶太人做工人，是因為他們是最便宜的勞工，開始的他便是為了獲取更多利潤這個目的。

這些猶太人得到搪瓷廠的一份工作，因此也就得到暫時的安全，沒有受到殺人機器的肆虐，辛德勒的工廠成了猶太人心中的避難所。

奧斯卡。

辛德勒，一名納粹分子，他應該早就知道德國人建造的火葬場及煤氣室，早就聽說，浴室和蒸氣室的噴頭上流出的不是水，而是毒氣。

他早就知道猶太人遭受納粹的殘酷逼害——電影中有一幕:一列列火車，一節節車廂載滿了猶太人的衣物——他們的鞋子，他們的金器，他們的衣服，成堆成堆的，

堆成好幾座小山，當一把一把金牙仍在驗收員面前，他擺出一副厭惡又無奈的神情，接著便是拿起放大鏡驗證它的真偽……並不是所有的德國人都仇視猶太人，那個驗收員心中應該有些為自己身為德國人而羞愧吧。

奧斯卡。

辛德勒應該也有這種感受吧，1943年，克拉科夫猶太人居住區遭受到的殘酷血洗，他偶然地在遠處看到了這一幕——無數的猶太人被從家中趕到了街上，一陣陣聲之後，一群群猶太人倒了下去。

入夜了，以為安全了的猶太人從各自藏身的地方"走"了出來，從地板下面，從床鋪下面，從鋼琴中……但是他們還沒來得及呼吸一口安寧的空氣，

耳邊又響起了聲……血從天花板上滲出，從床鋪下流出……一位德國指揮官悠閑地彈起了巴赫的樂曲……其時，一位德國軍官對辛德勒說:"今天是歷史的時刻，今天將會被紀念。

600年前，猶太人到科拉科落了腳，他們在商業、科學、教育、藝術上興盛起來，他們一無所有的來，一無所有，卻發了跡，六個世紀，形成了猶太人的科拉科，到今天晚上，六個世紀的歷史成為謠言，它們從未發生過，今天才是歷史。"

「今天是歷史的時刻，今天將會被紀念。」

是啊，是會被紀念的，是罪證的印記!猶太人的鮮血染紅了大地，更震撼了我們，生命的消逝是如此的輕易，那個遙遠的年代——猶太人的生命無法由自己掌控，不必說，

那站成一排的人們被同一顆子彈穿過節約出一堆可悲的屍體;不必說，那兩鬢斑白的老人被年輕的手掌呼過回響出一種人性的泯滅;不必說，那些堆成山的屍體被烈火無情的吞噬焚化出一片窒息的血色;

不必說，曾經天真無邪的孩子為了生命和延續只能躲到臭氣熏天的糞坑裡;不必說，一支發不出子彈的壞對著老人的腦袋不停響起，

甚至不知道哪一發會真的射出他只能這么無力在死亡線上等待……我們啊，生活在安逸的年代，從沒有想像過那戰火硝煙的年代是怎麼的一回事，只是淺顯地了解當中的皮毛。

我們能夠握住我們自己的生命，生存或死亡由我們自己來選擇，那時的猶太人呢?他們不能!

殘酷血洗，揭示出納粹分子的丑惡，那時多麼的令人氣憤，生命在他們眼中到底是什麼!辛德勒醒來了，他的良心使他脫離魔鬼的行列，那時的他只有一個想法:盡可能更多地保護猶太人免受奧斯威辛的死亡。

於是他制定了一份聲稱他的工廠正常運轉所"必需"的工人名單，通過賄賂納粹官員，使這批猶太人得以倖存下來。

獲取暴利之後的他曾對他的妻子說:「我敢說這里的人，他們不會輕易忘記辛德勒，他們會說;'奧斯卡·。

辛德勒人人都記得他，他做出了傑出的事，他能做別人所不能的，他空手來到這里，帶著兩只旅行箱離去，裝滿了世上的財富。

」說那番話時，他追逐的是金錢，但最後他得到了比金錢更可貴的財富——永恆。

施義的與受益的相互感激成就拯救的歷史——人們是永遠都不會忘記的。

戰爭結束了，下大雪的一天晚上，辛德勒與猶太人告別。

那時辛德勒哽咽地說:「我花掉了太多錢……我本可以……這輛車--十條命……這枚胸針--兩條命……」他，認為自己做得不夠。

「我本可以救出更多人的。」

那一刻，心裡那道情感的防線很輕易的垮掉了——為他所感動，他已經很努力了。

「你已經做了很多。」猶太人stern安慰道。

影片結束時，是辛德勒的墳墓，那些在戰前曾經獲得辛德勒救助，而幾十年後已步入暮年的猶太人，以及他們的後裔代表先人走過墳墓，都在墓碑上放一個代表"感恩永遠不變"的石塊作為敬禮。

那一紙名單見證了生命的永恆，那一枚指環在歷史的長河中閃著灼目的光芒，「救人一命等於救全世界」，那是多少條生命啊，長眠在耶路撒冷的的辛德勒，用財富買到了永恆，成為永不被遺忘的記憶，這是生命的見證!

《辛德勒的名單》觀後感三

這是一部以二戰為背景，具有巨大震撼力、深沉而令人痛苦的電影。

影片的第一個鏡頭是燭光。一根火柴點亮了蠟燭，猶太人在禱告，贊美詩結束後燭光慢慢熄滅，變成一縷青煙，然後四周變得黑暗。

特有的黑白色畫面增加了影片的厚重感，也象徵著猶太人的黑暗時代。在黑白攝影的畫面中，只有一個小女孩用紅色，這個小女孩是黑白色調的整個屠殺場面的亮點，之後女孩子又一次出現——她躺在一輛運屍車上正被送往焚屍爐。我想正是這個小女孩觸動了辛德勒，使他從最開始的一個趁機想發大財的商人，轉變成一個有良知有人性的人。這部電影讓我感受到強與弱、野蠻與良心的之間的沖擊。

那些名單上的猶太人是幸運的，就像斯坦恩說的：「這份名單是生命，名單之外就是深淵。」。但，有更多的猶太人慘遭屠殺，這是那個時代的杯具。歷史是蒼白的，沒有人能夠篡改它黑色基調——沉重而哀傷。但是，此刻卻仍然有很多人生活在炮火之下。

在中東的土地上，孩子們十幾歲便放下課本，拿起路邊的石塊練習著打倒敵人。很難想像在貧民區的矮牆、磚塊中他們的童年是多麼的悲哀。

具有諷刺意味的是在歐洲面臨人口老齡化的同時，中東地區的人口圖卻是個標準的正三角形——青年人口比例大大高於老年人口比例。他們的平均年齡甚至不到30歲!

這正是連年不斷的戰爭造成的!新聞里常聽到：「以色列對加沙實施新一輪空襲，造成巴勒斯坦6人死亡12人受傷」等等的戰報，我們都早已習以為常。當這些人的生命化為一個個數字的時候，沒有人哀傷。他們是戰爭的犧牲品，是戰爭的受害者。但是然後呢?沒有然後了!有的只是報復，又是死傷!

記得政治書里有句話：當今世界的局勢是大多數地區和平，少數地區戰爭。

這是一句令人可悲的話語，透露著整個世界的無奈。人性在那裡早已被泯滅，擁有的只是對生命的渴望。

我想我無力改變這一切，能夠的只有期望。

期望其他國家能夠帶給更多的人道主義援助!

期望巴以兩國的停火協議能夠長久!

期望全世界和平!

《辛德勒的名單》觀後感四

對於和戰爭有關的電影，女生的興趣一向都低於男生。

幾年在北京前買了這個電影的dvd, it男看過之後推崇備至，而我卻一直都沒有完全看過，僅僅看過其中的一些片斷。

當時印象比較深刻的是納粹在krakow大屠殺後繼續「清洗」躲藏在房子角落、夾層、壁櫥或鋼琴中的猶太人，其間一個德國人伴著聲在鋼琴上彈奏巴赫的「英國組曲」(第二組曲bwv807第一樂章)。。。

(不過我至今沒有想通電影里為什麼有一段德國士兵的對話，討論這個曲子是莫扎特的還是巴赫的。。。)

最近發現當初買的碟片已經自殺，況且現在可以買到更好的版本，於是又買了一套。

買回家之後溫習這舊片，終於完整地再看了一遍。

都說這個片子很長，但我坐在那裡，安靜地看完這個片子，一點也不感到時間的流逝。

影片是黑白的，所以，窗子是白的，鋼琴是黑的;天空是白的，大地是黑的;皮膚是白的，外套是黑的;雪花是白的，鮮血是黑的。

死亡本身造成的恐懼因此被淡化，而因為被納粹所踐踏的人性和對未來的無望而產生的絕望，反而被影片推至極限。

沒有看過這個片子的人，決不會體會到這種絕望，而我，我相信自己哪怕是看過十次，所感受到的，也決不會超過那真正絕望的千分之一。

那是怎樣不見天日的一種黑暗啊。

而辛德勒的名單，對於那一千多個「schindler‘s jews」來說，卻是那無盡黑暗中觸手可及的一絲微光。

名單上的每一個名字都是一個生命，一個故事，更能燃起更多的希望。

黑白的影片中，卻出乎意料地讓觀眾看到一絲色彩，--一個身穿淡淡紅衣猶太小女孩在遠遠的背景中奔跑，彷彿逃離了納粹的魔掌。

但在將近結尾處一輛裝滿了屍體的車上，我又看到了那個小小的紅色的身影，那個鏡頭依然是遠遠掠過，卻喚起人心中無盡的悲傷。

影片的末尾，那些獲救的「schindler‘s jews」手挽手站在地平線上，畫面漸漸由黑白轉為彩色，那個時刻，彷彿冰封大地瞬時充滿了陽光，讓我的喜悅眼淚溢滿了眼眶。

我想，這部電影的感人，不在於情節，在於可以喚起所有觀者心底的良知。

《辛德勒的名單》觀後感五

看完《辛德勒的名單》，眼淚又一次不住的落下，盡管不是第一次看，但是仍然有種揪心的感覺。看著喻示猶太人悲慘命運的黑白畫面，聽著夾雜在猶太兒童清澈無比的聖歌歌聲極其不協調的聲，整個影片默默地展示著那段哀傷的過往。個性是那個紅衣小女孩懵懂地穿行於人群，與再次出此刻運屍車上的比較更是讓人悲傷。猶太民族遭遇的是一段陰暗的歷史。在希特勒的領導下的第三帝國期間，根據粗略統計，約600萬猶太人、數千萬其他人正因希特勒的種族滅絕政策而被殺。每次讀到那段歷史，我讀有種莫名的恐懼。但是這種恐懼卻並非來自於大規模屠殺本身，而是屠殺是在極其有秩序的組織之下進行的，盡管屠殺對於人類來說確是恐怖的夢魘。不僅僅僅屠殺是流水線作業式的，就連從區分猶太人到送入集中營的所有程序都豎家機器高效率運轉的結果。而最悲哀的是，每張把猶太人送進死亡工廠的證件都有法官的許可。

無論從哪個角度來看，納粹時期的司法機關都無法擺脫助紂為虐這一污點。正因納粹所有殘酷對待猶太人的法律都是在司法機關的運作中得以順利的執行。也許有人會辯解到，正因德國法官所受到是實證主義法學的嚴格訓練，因此只能依照法律嚴格執行，哪怕有違本性。但是真實中的德國卻經常跨越制定法的界限適用法律，如1939年4月法蘭克福地方判處僅看了一德國少女一眼的猶太畫商馬克斯構成「進行侮辱和當眾傷害」罪，其侮辱僅由看了一眼構成，遠遠超越了其司法依據《保護德國血統和德國榮譽法》里對於侮辱的界定。也許還會有人辯解說，在納粹的思想宣傳下無法辨別這樣的法律是不正義的惡法，更無法拒絕適用違背正義的法律，正因沒有一個足以使其忽視自身可能遭受迫害的危險，義無反顧進行公正審判的環境。無可否認在很多時候確實是形勢比人強，不得已而為違心之舉。然而這個理由能夠用於普通的德國人，卻無力抹去司法的污點。的確，當時架構於優生學基礎上的納粹法學理論對於屠殺有著充分的理由，但是作為正義守護者的司法機關卻忘記了最重要的一點——對於人類個體的尊重，這一法律的終級價值目標。在強權之下，也許無法拒絕不正義之法，卻至少能夠逃避，至少能夠選取不一樣流合污。明明知道納粹進行

的是屠殺，卻仍然助紂為虐，這比直接殺人者更加惡劣。無論有著怎樣冠冕堂皇的理由，即使是作為執法者在執行實實在在的法律，依然最終要為此承擔職責，理解制裁。

影片的主人公辛德勒為營救猶太人所表現出來的那種對於生命的尊重，對於每個個體猶太人的尊重，正是司法機關在整個納粹統治期間的審判里最重要的缺席者。處於納粹瘋狂鼓吹的優生學理論中，再加上戰爭的背景，受到同化是難免的。但是就連影片里喜愛拿集中營里猶太人做活靶的阿蒙，亦能夠從對猶太女僕說「謝謝」和「我不想把感冒傳染給你」等不少細微情節中感到些許溫情。而最諷刺的是，納粹司法的判決里連這種極小的人性溫情都沒有，只有冷酷與漠然，不僅僅對於猶太人，亦包括波蘭人等一切所謂的劣等民族。最讓我覺得諷刺的案例發生在1943年2月18日，14個波蘭農夫因屠宰了自家的豬被控「非法屠宰罪」，9人被關進集中營，3人被判死刑。此案的司法邏輯竟然是人命不如豬命。只要此案的法官稍稍尊重一下人的生命，哪怕只是憐憫，怎會有出現如此可笑的判決呢?畢竟惡法消極執行與用心執行之間的效果是大不相同的。納粹法官之因此恐怖，是正因其對屠刀下的弱者生命的漠視與輕蔑。正是這種漠視讓法官的黑袍不再是守護者的象徵，而化身為恐怖陰影的一部分。

對每個個體的人的尊重不僅僅僅只是一種人文精神，一種人文關懷，對於法律人而言，它有著特殊的好處。正因無論詩平也好，正義也好，最終都務必在每個個體人的身上體現，甚至整個司法體系都離不開透過對個體人的適用而建立。公平、正義、民主這些美麗的夢想如果離開人，也但是只是抽象的詞彙象徵。法律也許看起來是冰冷而無人情味的，但是那種對人的尊重卻滲透在法律精神之中，從幾千年前的古希臘就已經開始。正是出於這種尊重，才有了英國大憲章里「風能進，雨能進，國王不能進」的名言，才有了威廉一世與磨坊的故事，才有了三權分立而築起的權力的堤壩，才有了「無罪推定」的刑法原則，才有了程序重於實體的實踐……從蘇格拉底到柏拉圖，從伯林到德沃金，從古希臘到後現代，從自然法學派到女權主義法學，這種尊重都有意無意的表此刻幾千年來各種學派不一樣學說的字里行間。學習法律兩年了，感覺自己與普通人最一樣的地方並不在於學到的法律知識，而是感受到的一種法律的精神——平等，尊重，寬容。我想，對於一個合格的司法人員來說，最重要的並不是法律知識的深厚與技巧的純熟，而是一種發自內心的尊重，尊重司法實踐中所遇到的所有當事人。如果所有的司法人員都能夠秉持這種態度的話，至少不會出現

如此之多的刑訊逼供與佘祥林式的杯具了。

㈧ 急需一篇看二戰電影的英文觀後感

《辛德勒的名單》觀後感

對這部磅礴偉大的電影，實在不敢妄加評論。可是，又覺得對於這樣一直想看卻一直不敢看的電影，如果不寫點什麼，也實在難以告慰自己粗鄙又真摯的感情。

哎，好生糾結。一如辛德勒先生的每一次抉擇。又很慶幸自己是在這個時候才看的這部電影，小一些時，微薄的耐性一定無法讓我對著黑白片花上3個多小時，一定會干出中途睡著、吃零食等挫事來分散注意力吧？

一直以來對猶太民族都有著難以言說的好感。他們的聰明勤奮以及在世界各個領域所取得的成就為世人矚目，甚至連他們的面容我都喜歡，尤其是女生，多半有著挺直的鼻樑，以及深邃的大眼睛，眼裡總是閃爍溫柔而智慧的光芒。

這樣的一個民族，卻一直經歷著磨難。一直到現在，以色列不曾得到過真正的和平，戰火蔓延，二戰期間，更是經歷了令人發指的瘋狂屠殺，以希特勒為首的納粹政權，將這個充滿智慧、善於創造財富的民族列為劣等民族，趕盡殺絕成為最通用的政策。一個個集中營林立，槍聲不斷，每一聲槍響，都是一個無辜的猶太人的倒下，有強壯的男人，有清秀的女人，也有稚嫩的孩童。

即使對這段歷史有不算太詳實的記憶，看《辛德勒的名單》時，還是一陣陣的揪心。力求還原於真實的一幀幀影像，讓我只覺影片持續時間過長，實際上對於那漫長屈辱的屠殺史而言，
三個多小時不過是滄海一粟的渺小吧？

即便如此，還是深深折服。辛德勒先生的拯救行為，猶太人的頑強、樂觀、聰明等美好秉性，納粹軍官的殘忍，歷歷在目，猶如乘坐時光機，回到那段令人不忍目睹的黑暗年代。

最喜歡斯皮爾伯格的地方正在於他並不刻意強調主人公的高大全的絕對美好，而是本著紀錄片的真實，因此呈現在眼前的是一個真實的人，辛德勒先生的投機心理，做為一名商人的奸詐，最開始的對於猶太人的麻木，在影片開始便能輕易知曉，但這些並不影響他的偉大。不像國內許多人物傳記電影總喜歡在謳歌贊美的同時，把偉人的瑕疵一並抹去，不百分百完美誓不罷休，殊不知一個總是考一百分的好學生必定是一個無趣的學生，一個從來不曾萌生過任何小邪惡念頭的人也必定是一個乏味的人。

猶太女人的智慧與果敢實在讓我深深震撼。在納粹軍官要進行體檢，只留下健康的猶太人以作為工人時，那些瘦弱蒼白的女人紛紛刺破自己的手指，硬是擠出鮮紅的血液，姑且充當胭脂，而後抹在每個人的臉上，以便讓每一位女人看起來臉色紅潤一些，製造身體健康的假象。對生的渴望那般強烈，實在讓我唏噓不已。活著的人，為什麼要鄙薄自己的生命？不過又覺得自己甚愛說教，看了這樣的鏡頭，就要上升到生命誠可貴的高度，也實在多餘。在那樣艱難的情勢下，選擇生還是死都不容易，而在最壞的年代裡，每一位猶太人卻爆發出無限的勇氣以及能摧毀一切的團結，即使在有限的躲藏空間里，因為空間的逼仄，而拒絕更多的人的自私與決絕，看起來還是帶著一絲絲的果敢。

突然發覺自己幾乎就要把猶太群體當做本片主角了，事實上，每一位猶太人的鮮活、真實，才讓這部有意表現辛德勒先生的電影這般深入人心。我熱愛那個民族的抗爭、重建的勇氣、以及能屈能伸的柔韌。這部電影里看不到《南京！南京！》中以劉燁為代表的愛國硬漢角色，猶太人的群體堅韌卻一覽無余。順便多言一句，在看完該片後，便覺得南京一片的拍攝手法有多麼拙劣，妄圖從不同角度表現南京大屠殺，卻讓人對那段歷史更加模糊。我總覺得，真正尊重歷史的電影，不需要過多的鋪墊以及渲染，近乎於紀錄片的忠實，會讓電影更加好看。或許我始終熱愛敘事文甚於抒情文吧？

在影片的結尾，當收到倖存的猶太人送給他的金戒指，上有希伯來文：拯救一個人，就是拯救一個世界，辛德勒先生應該是情緒坍塌，一直以來以為自己已經做的很好的正義勝利感也敗給了無力和沮喪，他指著自己的車，表示那能和歌德軍官換10個人，又指向自己的胸針，表示那能換2個人，甚至更多。他淚流滿面，抱怨自己的不夠努力，沒能賺更多的錢，以至於他能拯救的猶太人才區區1100多人。那一幕，著實讓我動容。在傾家盪產並且就要踏上流亡之路前，辛德勒先生終於徹底展示他偉大的一面，我肯定，他對於所有無辜的人類都有著宏大的愛。那一刻，居然好想哭。真正偉大的人從來不以自己的功績而自傲，卻還在檢討自己的不足引為罪孽。事實上，正如戒指上的箴言，辛德勒先生正是那段最黑暗歲月里的那道最亮的光。他的愛與付出，讓蒙受重創的猶太民族有了復興的基礎，看到片尾的文字描述，辛德勒猶太人已經有將近6000人時，深感安慰。其時是1994年，暌違15年過去，已經遠遠不是這個數字了吧？九泉之下，倘若有知，辛德勒先生一定會綻放舒心微笑吧？

在他簡單的墓碑上，擺滿了每一位扮演者及原型按照猶太儀式放下的石頭，最後一位緬懷者放上了玫瑰花。在罪惡橫行霸道妄圖一手遮天時，正是辛德勒先生的人性綻放的光芒，讓我們在漆黑里苦等也不至於徹底絕望。

寫到這里，已經是五味雜陳。一張張猶太人的倉皇表情、辛德勒先生的優雅剛毅走馬燈般晃過。辛德勒先生，我也想在你的墓碑上放上一塊石頭。