評析英文電影勇敢的心
『壹』 求《勇敢的心》英文影評,500詞左右。
The story of Braveheart is simple, but powerful. Peaceful William is driven to rebellion when his wife is killed. He becomes so devoted to the rebellion he starts, he sells his life to it, fighting both the corrupt Nobles of his country and the English oppressors.
The dialog of the film is simple and subtle. It's straightforward, and doesn't beat around the bush or sound poetic. It doesn't waste a moment of time, not an easy feat in a three hour film. THe film contains some great lines, lines that speak the pure truth of the matter. And also lines that are deceitful, the ones nobles are usually speaking.
James Horner's music is sweeping and majestic; it beautifully uses the bagpipes to add the ethnic flavor of Scotland and it sounds truly moving. It adds to the tension and excitement of every battle, and adds grace to every scene of love or silence.
The cinematography is an absolute treasure; a majestic sight to behold. A perfect fog always seems to settle, and the film looks as good rainy as it does in the clear sunlight. The towns are perfectly created, and look great. The costumes are superb, kilt to armor, looking authentic. Shots of thousands of soldiers charging look spectacular and epic on a grand scale.
The cast of the film are all absolutely superb. They all fit their roles perfectly, and everyone's accent is flawless. James Robinson is a great young Wallace. His facial expressions and quiet thinking-like stance, come off great and define the character early as emotionally pained. Catherine McKormkak is stunningly beautiful and full of joy , as Wallace's wife, and it is the memory of her that keeps William going. Brendan Gleeson is excellent as Wallace's friend Hamish; the gruff guy showing feelings through a lot of punches. Sophie Marceau is the weakest, but she nonetheless delivers a fine performance as the princess of Wales, who is not loved and suffers because of it. Patrick McGoohan is wicked awesome as Longshanks, the corrupt and evil king, with every line delivered with a wicked perfection. He is truly terrifying, in a villainous way. It's just the way he commands things, the subtly of how he so easily decides his troops can die, or how even after his nephew dies he is more concerned about the possibility of losing his head (in a literal sense). David O'Hara provides the comic relief as crazy Irishmen Stephen. He's downright hilarious, as he converses with god, but do not degrade the character to as little as a comedian. Soon after his first wise-cracking scene, it's down to being serious as he saves Wallace from a crazy man. Angus McFayden is perhaps the best support. He is the naive noble, who so badly wants freedom and to help Wallace, but is constantly deceived by those around him. His innocence rings true, as does his anger when he decides to change his ways of doing things. In a performance perhaps more terrifying then Longshanks, is Bruce's father played by Ian Bannen. Maybe it's the fact he's a leper, slowly decaying and dying (excellently shown with makeup), but I believe it has something to do with how he delivers every line so calmly. And what is he saying? He's discussing how he plays the country; how he thinks of the rebellions as a game, as opportunity for more land and support. It's scary. And of course there's the star Mel Gibson, as the heroic hero himself: William Wallace. Gibson is emotionally charged and deserved a Best Actor nod. He portrays Wallace as a very angered and hurt man. In one sequence particularly, from the time his wife dies until he brutally kills her murderer, Gibson does not speak. But it's all on his face; the pain, the hate, and even an air of sadness. And even as the dead body hits against his shoulder, he remains impassively depressed looking. He makes no acknowledgment that people are chanting his name in victory. His speech at the first battle, major battle, is truly inspiring. He delivers it with heartfelt passion, coming from a man who is being honest; trying to lead his countrymen in a fight for freedom not the Nobles' profit. And all the pain and anxiety, yet strength of will and character, come off perfectly in his final scene as he is brutally tortured. His face: unforgettable at every moment. Truly moving and powerful.
The direction is masterful. Here, Mel directs as as sharply as he acts. THe visuals are worthy of Peter Jackson, the battles are worthy of Ridley Scott, and the storytelling is worthy of Steven Spielberg. THe violence is intense, the battles being some of the most violent I've ever seen. It's not for the squeamish, but the violence is there to show the hardships of the fight for freedom. Mel holds no bars back. He unleashes medieval brutality. The final torture scene is brutal, but it shows Wallace's triumph to overcome it.
『貳』 跪求一偏《勇敢的心》英語作文觀後感,要求原創,200詞以上帶翻譯,重謝……
Braveheart was a huge deal when it first came out. I never really watched the film properly until recently. As a frequent cinema-goer since my youth I was not a part of the mid-nineties cultural phenomenon that was Braveheart's release in Scotland. I did turn up at the the cinema, the old Odeon in Edinburgh, but the queue went round the block (the literal term for a blockbuster) and there was no way in hell I was prepared to wait for three hours on a gray September afternoon (a choice I came to regret). Every subsequent attempt since then was blocked. I never rented the video as I didn't want to watch in pan-and-scan. The fact that every single living Scottish person had seen it apart from myself really got on my nerves, and I was quite bitter about it. And then, as the fever died down, I just kind of forgot about it and moved on.
Watching it fully as an alt I think I probably enjoy it more now that I would have done as a teenager. It's certainly a huge epic right up there with the best of them. Mel Gibson captures the pretty side of Scotland wonderfully with his scope photography accompanied by James Horner's bittersweet score. The film never really feels three hours long, the time just disappears.
Nearly every notable Scottish actor (apart from Connery and Connelly) appears at some point. From the brilliant (Brian Cox) to the dreary and pretentious (Peter Mullan). Keep a lookout for Tommy Flanagan too, in one of his earlier roles.
The battle scenes are impressive, but I wish there were more gory. Gibson's first cut of the film was apparently bloodier, I wish it had remained intact. But despite the grim satisfaction of seeing the English aggressors getting splattered the fact that Scotland IS still ruled by England kind renders Wallace's bravery irrelevant. It may have been 700 years ago, but I hate the fact that he ultimately died for nothing. We DON'T have a country of our own, plain and si-mp-le.
華萊士,終其一生都是一個鬥士,一個為了愛情而斗的鬥士,一個為了自由而斗的鬥士,一個為了國家和命運而斗的鬥士。他是一個讓人尊敬的英雄。
首先是華萊士他的成長,對他而言,真正的成長是在失去了父親以後。之前他只不過是一個單純的小孩而已。當他看到那個小屋裡被人弔死的同胞,他只是一種震嚇,一般小孩一樣驚嚇而已。但他父親哥哥死後,他變得勇敢,敢於直面死亡了,面對他父親和哥哥的遺體,他變得如此平靜。再後來,他叔叔把他帶走,說是人要先學會用他的腦袋才能真正的戰斗,把他帶去接受教育,這個是他的故事的開端,也是他生命意義上的長大了。
其次是他的愛情,這部片他的愛情分成了兩部分。一個就是和小時候的梅倫,一個美麗的蘇格蘭姑娘,一個在他父親的葬禮後送了一枝花安慰他的人。華萊士求學有成後回來向他求婚。因為當時貴族享有初夜權的原因,他們在森林裡偷偷的結婚了,這里可以體現出他的一種反抗的精神,一種本能的叛逆。但他們的愛情沒有維系多久,因為梅倫的美麗太耀眼了,貴族殺了梅倫,這是蘇格蘭和英格蘭的戰斗的導火線,因為這引發了華萊士的爆發,揭竿而起,各地響應。第二段是與皇後的感情。皇後丈夫本來就是個同性戀,包辦的婚姻讓她感覺不到愛情的存在,根本沒有感情可言。缺乏了愛情的滋潤,讓為愛情而起的華萊士走進了她的心靈,她自然為華萊士的豪情傾倒了。而華萊士則是在為了自由而奮身博殺,因為失去了梅倫,他一直在為了他的信念作戰,皇後的美麗和善良感動了他,兩顆乾枯的心就這樣融在了一起。
再說說他的戰斗,華萊士開始戰斗的時候,是因為貴族殺了他的妻子梅倫,可以說是一個簡單的復仇行動,但事情一開始就不能再受到控制的,尤其是領導權掌握在一個聰明人的手裡。後來,他們起義得到了各地不斷的支持,這讓人看到了蘇格蘭的自由希望。一個方面是因為他們蘇格蘭的人受迫壓太久了,再加上華萊士所學的智慧,他們勢如破竹,這就很讓人,特別是愛德華心慌了。想盡辦法招安華萊士,最後還是利用了一個騙局把華萊士抓了。
最後,在砍頭台。這里是這部片的一個精華了,思想就是在這里的。行刑前,兩個小丑在那裡舞盡丑態,讓人發笑,但也是說明了英國人的行為恰恰就是兩個小丑所為。華萊士就刑,行人對這位英雄扔雞蛋、爛菜,恰恰說明了國民的麻木和愚昧。後來在刑台上,華萊士受盡了各樣殘酷的折磨,下面則是一片歡呼聲。華萊士就刑前,看到那個小孩在笑,可能這里也是一個希望的延續,把希望寄託給了後人。那聲振饋發聾的「freedom」讓人久久不能放下思想,激人不斷前進。可以說,在刑台這段,是鮮明的對比讓這個自由的精神體現的淋漓盡致的。一邊是鬥士、英雄,一邊是愚昧的國民;一邊是前進中的先鋒,一邊是止步不前的落伍者。差距就在這里體現了,代溝在這里產生。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的,因為這里有可貴的思想——自由。沒有自由了你們還能幹什麼?也許是真的,我們也該好好思量思量。
望採納!~~
『叄』 急需電影勇敢的心英文影評一篇100到200字就行,要簡單易懂的最好是先寫的,謝謝啦!
The Review of Braveheart
I am deeply impressed by William Wallace』s courage and the efforts that the Scottish created to resume soverienty.It reminds me of my dream.Dream,whatever it is,really should be pursued heart and soul.Compared to Wallace,I am so lazy and passive.I watched it,giving free outlet to my thoughts and tears.
There are two scenes over which I really feel melancholy.The initial is when Meilun is buried. The same point happened when Wallace was yong,weeping at the death of his father.Tiny Meilun sent him a purple thistle .to console his sorrow.Even so,Meilun is dead now,no a single would send him a purple thist any much more.He has only himself in this world following losing the two persons he loves most.The second one particular is the very first war against England in the battlefield.,in which they were much weaker in regard to weapons and numbers.Confronted with immense difficulties,they had been not afaid,thinking we would drop.Instead,they fighted bravely and confidently.
Life will not usually be what we want. Wallace』s father died when he was a small boy.He did not want this tragedy transpire but it did take place,so he had to accept it;when his uncle came and would part him with his hometown,he obeyed with reluctance;moreover,his heart was broken facing the death of Meilan,but he had to accept it and be strong.Adversity leads to prosperity on situation that we can turn sorrow into strength.
Much as what is stated above,courage alone won』t guarantee success.Wallace』s uncle informed him :」you have to find out to use your thoughts,then weapons.」Being flexiable and conscious is even more critical,that is to say ,you know how to obtain your goal prior to you take actions.Additionally,it is worth notifying that pals are also extremely important in the pursue of dream.A life devoid of a pal is a life with out a sun.Wallace has Hamiss,who accompanied him to the end.
以上為整篇影評,你可以按自己的要求摘取某段或某句,這里的單詞也不算很生
『肆』 求<<勇敢的心>>英文簡介和影評
《勇敢的心》 Set in the late 13th century, 'Braveheart' is the story of one of Scotland's greatest national heroes Sir William Wallace. leader of the Scottish resistance forces ring the first years of the long, ultimately successful struggle to free Scotland from English rule... Crucially charismatic in the title role, Gibson plays the heroic figure and emerges as a remarkable hero with wit and romantic soul, determined to rid his country of its English oppressors... Wallace's revolution was set in motion, with great obstacles from his countrymen... Many Scottish nobles lent him only grudging support as most of them were more concerned with wealth and titles than the freedom of the country... In fact, the Scottish leaders are in favor of revolt-or not-depending on English bribes... Wallace, by comparison, is a man of honor, incorruptible and righteous... He was knighted and proclaimed 'guardian and high protector of Scotland,' but as much as he railed against the Scottish nobles, submitted to Edward I, King of England, he was astonished and in shock to discover the treachery of the leading Scot contender for the throne—Robert, the Earl of Bruce—to whom he confided , 'The people would follow you, if you would only lead them.' Sophie Marceau is exquisite as the distressed princess Isabella of France who ends up falling in love with Wallace, warning him out of several traps... Catherine McCormack is a stunning beauty who ignites Wallace's revolution... Patrick McGoohan is chilling, brutal, and vicious as the ruthless Edward I, known by the nickname 'Longshanks.' This king remains simply the embodiment of evil... While Angus McFadyen moves as a nobleman torn between his conscience and political aspiration, and Brendan Gleeson brings strength and humor to his role as the robust Hamish, David O'Hara is very effective as the crazy Irishman who provides much of the film's comic relief from even the most tensed moments... Mel Gibson has reason to be proud of 'Braveheart.' It is a motion picture that dares to be excessive... Gibson presents passionately the most spaciously impressive battles (yet staged for films) even excessively, and it is his passion and excess that make the motion picture great... The horror and futility of massed hand-to-hand combats are exciting rather repulsive... It is epic film-making at its glorious best... Gibson's 'Braveheart' focuses on the human side of Wallace, a character so immense, so intelligent, and so passionate, exploring the definitions of honor and nobility, pushing us to follow the hero into his struggle against injustice and oppression...
『伍』 電影勇敢的心,英文觀後感
I
remember seeing this movie for the first time in late 2003, and I was
impressed. I saw it again last night, and I was even more impressed. The
acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant. For me, all my guesses
were incorrect. Everything that happens in this movie in unpredicted.
The last half hour itself was highly unpredictable, and it had a
powerful message. When a scene was meant to be dramatic, they did a
great job at it. I don't know about everybody else, but the ending did
make me cry. The message the movie sent kept me thinking for a while.
The amount of courage and bravery was inconceivable, there was barely
any faults or anything wrong with the movie. For a movie of 1995, they
did a great job.
I absolutely guarantee this movie to anybody who
enjoys action and war with a bit of drama mixed in. One of the best, or
maybe even the best movie of the 20th century.
19 November 2005 | by Sheldon Eyzenga
(Canada)
『陸』 英語作文 勇敢的心電影劇情介紹
提供英文劇情介紹2篇,見附件。
『柒』 《勇敢的心》觀後感(3)
《勇敢的心》觀後感(精選10篇)
Wallace終究是死了,曾經兩度失信的Bruce在陣前對著蘇格蘭人,深吸一口氣,喊道:「你們曾經和華萊士一起流血!」他抽出長劍,「現在,請你們跟我一起流血吧!」蘇格蘭人振奮了,他們發出了震天動地的叫喊聲:「Wallace——Wallace——」於是,他們打得如詩一般美麗,打得一點都不失蘇格蘭人的面子,為自己贏得了Wallace同樣信仰和追求的自由和勝利。
那把無數次在Wallace手中出現的劍插在一大片綠地上,劍柄上紅色的綢帶一直飄揚到影片的最後,就像是勝利者的墓誌銘。
勇敢的心,勇敢地活著。
《勇敢的心》觀後感 篇5
《勇敢的心》一直被視為一部悲壯的、融合血淚傳奇的史詩片,在影片中,人們常常為蘇格蘭那綿延的山脈、凄婉的風笛和蘇格蘭人民在貧困痛苦中發出的凄厲呼號所感動,也為華萊士一往無前的精神所鼓舞。威廉?華萊士的精神就如同一面旗幟,指引著蘇格蘭人民爭取到了最後的自由。他做到了,他沒有白白犧牲。整部影片圍繞的主題是「自由」
,為自由而戰,為自由而勇敢,「勇敢的心」指的還有勇於面對自己,絕不背叛自己的真意,那就是真正地活過了,在肉體的死亡中也能得到精神上的永生。我們經常會問自己什麼對自己最為重要,我認為華萊士用他最後一句話告訴了我們答案:「Freedom」。
濃郁的色調,時急時緩的音樂,血腥的打鬥,堅定的眼神,這便是由梅爾吉普森自導自演的電影《勇敢的心》。電影以英格蘭和蘇格蘭的矛盾為大歷史背景,從而向人們講述了一個主由人公威廉姆。華萊士領導蘇格蘭人民反對英格蘭貴族統治爭取自由的扣人心弦的故事。電影將英雄華萊士的形象塑造得很成功,並將其勇敢的心路歷程展現得淋漓盡致,讓我真正體味到了什麼是真正的勇敢。
在影片的開頭,我們看到的小華萊士雖然置身於英格蘭貴族的奴役之下,但在他的眼裡我們看到更多的是純真,童趣,直到當他第一次看到被懸掛在谷倉里的同伴和鄉民屍體時,我們才看到在他單純的眼裡流露出了對死亡的驚恐。緊接著死亡便叩響了他們家的大門,面對父親和哥哥的死亡。本在開心等著父親和哥哥歸來的小華萊士等來的卻是一輛載著他們屍體的馬車,他不敢面對,繼續做著自己的事來掩飾內心的痛苦,甚至不敢相信這是事實,最終還是在父親戰友的召喚下來到父親哥哥屍體的旁邊,撫摸著父親那冷冰冰的屍體,任憑淚水噙滿眼眶卻絲毫沒有復仇的躁動。
他必須勇敢的接受這一事實,必須學會面對死亡,讓內心強大起來。很多年後當他再次回到這片土地時,他勇敢的追求屬於自己的愛情,追求在父親葬禮上送自己花朵的女孩美倫,並與美倫秘密結婚,出於對英格蘭貴族享有少女初夜權的無聲的反抗。然而幸福很短暫,美倫的美貌遭來貴族的垂涎,在反抗中被貴族殘忍的殺害。這便激起了華萊士內心復仇的火花,開始武力反抗英格蘭貴族。隨後各地雲集響應,勢如破竹。與前兩次不同的是,在妻子美倫的葬禮上,華萊士沒再掉眼淚。因為他明白他是一個男人,可以勇敢的去面對並且對此不再無奈。因此美倫的死讓他放棄了回家過安穩日子的初衷,而是勇敢的去追求屬於自己屬於民族的自由。故事發展到這里,華萊士一直備受親人愛人離去的煎熬,似乎註定孤苦一人的遭遇讓我們深感同情。但我們又看到,華萊士已在痛苦的剝離中正慢慢的成長,一顆勇敢的心開始真正地被歷練。
華萊士的勇敢並非是莽撞而是夾有智慧的,這充分體現在兩次戰役中。面對在英格蘭強大的軍隊,無論是武器裝備還是人數,華萊士領導的蘇格蘭軍隊都是無法與之相抗衡的,但是華萊士並沒有因此而退卻而誠服於英格蘭國王,相反他讓戰士准備長矛,在戰場上又激勵戰士大增軍隊士氣,採取分戰術,在與敵人浴血奮戰後終取得第一次戰爭的勝利。
第二次戰爭在華萊士的精心准備之下,利用柏油箭火燃燒敵人側後方,眼看戰爭勝負已分,就在觀眾大快人心之時,故事突然發生了轉變,華萊士的同盟者莫納叛變了,他沒有率軍加入已殺入重圍的華萊士,致使華萊士軍隊損失慘重,華萊士自己也在戰爭中負傷,在他沖出重圍去刺殺國王時,被一個騎兵攔住,在和騎兵廝打中發現騎兵竟是莫納,他本可以輕而義舉的殺掉莫納但他沒有而是痛苦的躺下了,不為別的只為這種同族間的背叛而痛心,但是這一切並未阻礙他繼續反抗英格蘭貴族的步伐,接下來便是勇敢的去復仇,去殺掉這次反叛背後的始作俑者,這是對背叛民族行為的懲罰,也是對死去同胞們的交待,這一切雖然有血腥,有殘忍,但絲毫沒有減退華萊士在觀眾心中的英雄形象,在觀眾眼中華萊士反而成為一個集智慧勇氣於一身的具有傳奇色彩人物。
影片的結局是出人意料但卻又在情理之中的,讓人意外的是華萊士這個充滿神奇色彩的英雄不是犧牲在戰場,而是落入英格蘭手中被英格蘭當局處死。情理之中則是他又一次相信莫納一夥一提出的聯合並單刀赴會,結果他再次被他們出賣,並被押往英格蘭法庭被定為叛國罪。這次華萊士表現得很從容,雖然他知道等待他的將是酷刑和死亡。在服刑場上,華萊士面對的是麻木愚鈍的民眾們對他的不理解和嗤之以鼻,聽到的是民眾們對行刑者的大聲附和,可華萊士似乎並不在乎,此刻在他眼裡只看到一個小孩子的笑臉,透過笑臉他似乎看到了希望。在身體受到酷刑的摧殘後,他依然不卑不亢,就在最後關頭他依然用盡全身力量大聲喊出自由二字,似乎是在提醒所有的人,去勇敢的追求自由。
看完整部影片,我想到了我國古代的神話故事《誇父追日》,誇父一生都在追求溫暖結果卻因此而死,電影的主人公華萊士也因自己的追求而死,但不同的是誇父死後為後人留下的是一片鄧林,隱蔽後人。而華萊士死後留下的卻是一顆鼓勵後人為自由不斷去追求的'勇敢的心,激勵著他那個時代的人去繼承他的遺志而繼續努力,同時也激勵著我們觀眾,去勇敢的追求自己想要的一切,正如華萊士父親夢中對他說「你的心是自由的,去勇敢的追求自由」
《勇敢的心》觀後感 篇6
華萊士,終其一生都是一個鬥士,一個為了愛情而斗的鬥士,一個為了自由而斗的鬥士,一個為了國家和命運而斗的鬥士,是一個讓人尊敬的英雄。
首先是華萊士他的成長,對他而言,真正的成長是在失去了父親以後。之前他只不過是一個單純的小孩而已。當他看到那個小屋裡被人弔死的同胞,他只是一種震嚇,一般小孩一樣驚嚇而已。但他父親哥哥死後,他變得勇敢,敢於直面死亡了,面對他父親和哥哥的遺體,他變得如此平靜。再後來,他叔叔把他帶走,說是人要先學會用他的腦袋才能真正的戰斗,把他帶去接受教育,這個是他的故事的開端,也是他生命意義上的長大了。
其次是他的愛情,這部片他的愛情分成了兩部分。一個就是和小時候的梅倫,一個美麗的蘇格蘭姑娘,一個在他父親的葬禮後送了一枝花安慰他的人。華萊士求學有成後回來向他求婚。因為當時貴族享有初夜權的原因,他們在森林裡偷偷的結婚了,這里可以體現出他的一種反抗的精神,一種本能的叛逆,但他們的愛情沒有維系多久,因為梅倫的美麗太耀眼了,貴族殺了梅倫,這是蘇格蘭和英格蘭的戰斗的導火線,因為這引發了華萊士的爆發,揭竿而起,各地響應。第二段是與皇後的感情。皇後丈夫本來就是個同性戀,包辦的婚姻讓她感覺不到愛情的存在,根本沒有感情可言。缺乏了愛情的滋潤,讓為愛情而起的華萊士走進了她的心靈,她自然為華萊士的豪情傾倒了。而華萊士則是在為了自由而奮身博殺,因為失去了梅倫,他一直在為了他的信念作戰,皇後的美麗和善良感動了他,兩顆乾枯的心就這樣融在了一起。
再說說他的戰斗,華萊士開始戰斗的時候,是因為貴族殺了他的妻子梅倫,可以說是一個簡單的復仇行動,但事情一開始就不能再受到控制的,尤其是領導權掌握在一個聰明人的手裡。後來,他們起義得到了各地不斷的支持,這讓人看到了蘇格蘭的自由希望。一個方面是因為他們蘇格蘭的人受迫壓太久了,再加上華萊士所學的智慧,他們勢如破竹,這就很讓人,特別是愛德華心慌了。想盡辦法招安華萊士,最後還是利用了一個騙局把華萊士抓了。
最後,在砍頭台。這里是這部片的一個精華了,思想就是在這里的。行刑前,兩個小丑在那裡舞盡丑態,讓人發笑,但也是說明了英國人的行為恰恰就是兩個小丑所為。華萊士就刑,行人對這位英雄扔雞蛋、爛菜,恰恰說明了國民的麻木和愚昧。後來在刑台上,華萊士受盡了各樣殘酷的折磨,下面則是一片歡呼聲。華萊士就刑前,看到那個小孩在笑,可能這里也是一個希望的延續,把希望寄託給了後人。那聲振饋發聾的「freedom」讓人久久不能放下思想,激人不斷前進。可以說,在刑台這段,是鮮明的對比讓這個自由的精神體現的淋漓盡致的。一邊是鬥士、英雄,一邊是愚昧的國民;一邊是前進中的先鋒,一邊是止步不前的落伍者。差距就在這里體現了,代溝在這里產生。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的,因為這里有可貴的思想——自由。沒有自由了你們還能幹什麼?也許是真的,我們也該好好思量思量。
《勇敢的心》觀後感 篇7
《勇敢的心》是由導演梅爾·吉布森執導,片長177分鍾,1995年5月18日在美國上映。
威廉華萊士童年時,其父、蘇格蘭民族英雄馬索華萊士在與英軍的斗爭中犧牲,他開始接受父親好友的指導,學習蘇格蘭文化和武術。青年華萊士(梅爾吉布森)學成回到故鄉,向美麗的少女梅倫求婚,不想梅倫被英軍搶去且遭殺害。在廣大村民「英雄之後」的呼聲中,華萊士率眾揭竿起義,並與蘇格蘭貴族羅伯結成聯盟,但不久他發現,蘇格蘭貴族考慮的只是自身的利益。
英王為緩和局勢,派伊莎貝拉(蘇菲瑪索)前去和華萊士談判,由於英王只想收買華萊士,根本不顧蘇格蘭人民的自由和平等,談判失敗,但這一切並不為伊莎貝拉所知。伊莎貝拉歸國後發現事情真相,且知曉英王正策劃陰招,忙送信給華萊士,而兩人的愛情,也在戰爭與陰謀中悄然滋生。
這是一部經典的影片,曾經觀賞過,本次算是經典回顧了。雖然影片的名字叫做勇敢的心,我覺得叫自由更契合主題。當主人公不斷強化自由的觀念時,我不禁想起那首著名的詩句:生命誠可貴,愛情價更高。若為自由故,兩者皆可拋。還想起國學大家陳寅恪給王國維著名那句的墓誌銘:獨立之精神,自由之思想。
當蘇菲瑪索出場的時候,我特別後悔前些天對阿佳妮的評價,看完《羅丹的情人》我覺得阿佳妮比蘇菲瑪索還要驚艷。可能是太久沒有看蘇菲瑪索,印象有些模糊。但是,我錯了,再見蘇菲瑪索,那張臉那雙眼,無法超越,永遠的女神。
保持那份渴望自由的心。
《勇敢的心》觀後感 篇8
歷史像深夜裡浩瀚無際的天空一樣,那樣純潔、美麗,使人充滿無限的遐思,你看那點點的繁星,裝飾著那深藍色的「幕布」,一閃一閃的,充滿著生命的活力。愛我看來,人類幾千年的歷史就像那浩瀚的藍天,而那充滿活力的繁星,一閃一閃的,它們就是歷史長河中無數的英雄,他們那高潔的品格,崇高的人格魅力,偉大的奉獻和如傳奇一般的人生深深地吸引,感動著我們,使我們久久不能忘懷。
在我看來,英雄註定有著傳奇般的一生和令人遺憾的逝去。而威廉也正是一個這樣的人。他擁有一個如水晶般透明的心,小心地珍藏著他孩童時期的愛情,他對他的妻子的愛有如火一般熱烈,彼此間簡單單純而又熱烈地愛著對方。然而他又擁有一顆岩石般堅定的心。當他看到自己的妻子慘死在英格蘭人的刀下,他毅然決然地踏上了一條漫長而又艱辛的反抗之路。盡管在一些人看來,那是無稽之談,盡管在一些人看來,那是一條不歸路,但堅定而又勇敢的他還是選擇了勇往直前,堅定自己的選擇,完成自己勇敢者的游戲。
「英雄」之所以是英雄,那不尋常的,超出世人的一點是有一顆勇敢的心,也許每個人都會堅定地認為自己是一個勇敢的人,但當你直面死亡時,你會怎樣呢?或是當你直面受盡折磨而死時,你會直面樣呢?擁有一顆「勇敢的心」的威廉在兩中截然不同的死法面前,毅然放棄了弱者的選擇-服毒而死,堅持直面敵人殘忍的蹂躪,只為向兇殘的英格蘭人證明,蘇格蘭人是不畏懼死亡的。蘇格蘭人最終會得到自由的,他那最後的一聲呼喊「FREEDOM」為英格蘭人喚起了戰爭的鬥志和勝利的希望。
也許,真正的英雄不一定被所有的人所銘記,真正的英雄不一定被所有的人認可,真正的英雄不一定擁有金子般閃耀的一生和一個快樂的絕句,但我相信,真正的英雄一定有一顆勇敢的心。
《勇敢的心》觀後感 篇9
勇敢的心是震撼人心的,因為這里有可貴的思想——自由。沒有自由了你們還能幹什麼?也許是真的,我們也該好好思量思量。
信仰是需要代言人的,就像宗教信仰中需要耶穌像和人間的發言人教皇一樣,自由需要的是精神領袖。華萊士的出現是一種必然更是一種結果。他死後曾經用過的那把大劍更是繼承這種精神上的傳揚,就像「神像」,有了他每個人就有了希望,有了他就能集結更多的自由人,有了他就象徵了勝利。在最後漢密斯擲出華萊士的那把大劍在天空中劃出完美的曲線最後穩穩的插在地上時,勝利已經被預示了。其實不需要後面的旁白我們也能猜得到結局——蘇格蘭贏得了自由。當你追尋一種事物的信念成為一種執著時,那麼他已經成為了一種信仰。
什麼是勇敢?是源於自己面對困境,以智慧與毅力為戰斗的武器,再把原先狹隘的個人追求,升華為為有著共同遭遇的人的利益而斗爭。這樣,即便是源於私心,也能為別人所接受,得到別人的幫助,最終喚醒我們沉睡的勇氣。原本華萊士只是想回家娶妻生子,過平凡安定的生活,但是他終究被逼上了追求自由的道路。他沉睡的心靈蘇醒了過來,也讓曾經搖擺不定的貴族ROBERT覺醒,放棄了英格蘭的加冕,拔出利劍,帶領著蘇格蘭的平明軍隊,咆哮著向英軍沖殺過去。
《勇敢的心》觀後感 篇10
閑著無聊,又重溫了下勇敢的心這部電影。悠揚的風笛聲伴著蘇格蘭的美景,讓人神往。
被結尾華萊士那句「freedom」深深的震撼了,蘇格蘭確實是一個屢遭磨難的民族。英國的原始居民是凱爾特人;由於英國很早被羅馬政府殖民,所以凱爾特人的文明程度很長時間高於歐洲大陸。凱爾特人一開始就被羅馬人奴役,隨著歐洲蠻族勢力的入侵,羅馬帝國實力的衰退,羅馬人退出了英倫小島。傳說中亞瑟王的原型就是羅馬當時在英格蘭的駐軍軍官,因為不願離去而帶領自己曾經的敵人凱爾特人和羅馬戍邊軍團的後裔與入侵的野蠻人盎格魯和薩克森人作戰。在公元七世紀左右,在目前德法一帶的盎格魯人和薩克森人開始入侵英國(他們應該也算日耳曼人的一支),並將凱爾特人逐漸驅逐到愛爾蘭和蘇格蘭一帶;直到11世紀的諾曼征服,來自北歐的海盜佔領了法國的諾曼並被法王所承認,後來諾曼人佔領了英格蘭,但由於諾曼人人數太少,所以盎格魯「薩格森人仍然保存著大量的貴族地主。
所以,在蘇格蘭廣大的老百姓實際是凱爾特人,在勇敢的心裡描述的戰爭就是是早來的征服者蘇格蘭的盎格魯」薩克森貴族和新來的征服者諾曼人的戰爭。蘇格蘭人經歷過3個外來民族的統治和奴役,甚至諾曼人為了吸引更多的英格蘭貴族去蘇格蘭,而頒布了初夜權的法令,令人發指。
蘇格蘭人從來沒有間斷過自己對外來入侵者的反抗,但是蘇格蘭長期以來形成了多個氏族部落,一直沒有一個強有力的中央集權統治國家。很容易被入侵者分而制之或以利分化。蘇格蘭和英格蘭的統一,也是貴族間的妥協(蘇格蘭貴族很多都有兩國的封號,牆頭草兩頭倒)民眾仍然對英格蘭人很仇視,及時是今天也是如此。
雖然威廉「華萊士被認為是蘇格蘭歷史上最偉大的民族英雄之一;但蘇格蘭人心目中真正的英雄實際是片中那個最後悔悟的叛徒羅伯特。布魯斯!羅伯特。布魯斯歷史上不僅沒有叛變過,而且一直堅持與英格蘭斗爭;也許有人讀過一篇英文課外讀物,裡面講一名蘇格蘭王子屢次被敵人打敗;最後逃到一個城堡,在絕望之際看到一支蜘蛛結網,每次都失敗直到第七次終於把網結成了;王子受到了鼓舞,重整旗鼓再次戰斗終於贏得了勝利。 這里講的就是在最後為蘇格蘭贏得獨立(也就是片子的結尾)的班諾克本之戰之前的傳說。
羅伯特。布魯斯後來成為蘇格蘭國王,在他死後一名蘇格蘭騎士帶著他的心臟想要埋葬到耶路撒冷;路上經過西班牙遇到和摩爾人的戰爭,這名騎士在沖鋒前舉起羅伯特。布魯斯的心臟高喊」勇敢的心呀,帶領我沖鋒吧!「 ,最後這名騎士還是犧牲了;第二天一名倖存的蘇格蘭騎士在屍體堆里找到了羅伯特。布魯斯的心臟並帶回蘇格蘭喪於一個修道院里;這才是真正的勇敢的心,有個蘇格蘭的詩人還寫了一篇詩來歌頌布魯斯,其中有一句就是A noble heart cannot be at peace if freedom is lacking 勇敢的心 其實更大程度上應該說的是布魯斯而不是華萊士,看來國外的電影和國內的也有的拼 ,也喜歡戲說。
;『捌』 現在急要一篇200字左右的《勇敢的心》的影評要英文的
The story of Braveheart is simple, but powerful. Peaceful William is driven to rebellion when his wife is killed. He becomes so devoted to the rebellion he starts, he sells his life to it, fighting both the corrupt Nobles of his country and the English oppressors.
The dialog of the film is simple and subtle. It's straightforward, and doesn't beat around the bush or sound poetic. It doesn't waste a moment of time, not an easy feat in a three hour film. THe film contains some great lines, lines that speak the pure truth of the matter. And also lines that are deceitful, the ones nobles are usually speaking.
James Horner's music is sweeping and majestic; it beautifully uses the bagpipes to add the ethnic flavor of Scotland and it sounds truly moving. It adds to the tension and excitement of every battle, and adds grace to every scene of love or silence.
The cinematography is an absolute treasure; a majestic sight to behold. A perfect fog always seems to settle, and the film looks as good rainy as it does in the clear sunlight. The towns are perfectly created, and look great. The costumes are superb, kilt to armor, looking authentic. Shots of thousands of soldiers charging look spectacular and epic on a grand scale.
The cast of the film are all absolutely superb. They all fit their roles perfectly, and everyone's accent is flawless. James Robinson is a great young Wallace. His facial expressions and quiet thinking-like stance, come off great and define the character early as emotionally pained. Catherine McKormkak is stunningly beautiful and full of joy , as Wallace's wife, and it is the memory of her that keeps William going. Brendan Gleeson is excellent as Wallace's friend Hamish; the gruff guy showing feelings through a lot of punches. Sophie Marceau is the weakest, but she nonetheless delivers a fine performance as the princess of Wales, who is not loved and suffers because of it. Patrick McGoohan is wicked awesome as Longshanks, the corrupt and evil king, with every line delivered with a wicked perfection. He is truly terrifying, in a villainous way. It's just the way he commands things, the subtly of how he so easily decides his troops can die, or how even after his nephew dies he is more concerned about the possibility of losing his head (in a literal sense). David O'Hara provides the comic relief as crazy Irishmen Stephen. He's downright hilarious, as he converses with god, but do not degrade the character to as little as a comedian. Soon after his first wise-cracking scene, it's down to being serious as he saves Wallace from a crazy man. Angus McFayden is perhaps the best support. He is the naive noble, who so badly wants freedom and to help Wallace, but is constantly deceived by those around him. His innocence rings true, as does his anger when he decides to change his ways of doing things. In a performance perhaps more terrifying then Longshanks, is Bruce's father played by Ian Bannen. Maybe it's the fact he's a leper, slowly decaying and dying (excellently shown with makeup), but I believe it has something to do with how he delivers every line so calmly. And what is he saying? He's discussing how he plays the country; how he thinks of the rebellions as a game, as opportunity for more land and support. It's scary. And of course there's the star Mel Gibson, as the heroic hero himself: William Wallace. Gibson is emotionally charged and deserved a Best Actor nod. He portrays Wallace as a very angered and hurt man. In one sequence particularly, from the time his wife dies until he brutally kills her murderer, Gibson does not speak. But it's all on his face; the pain, the hate, and even an air of sadness. And even as the dead body hits against his shoulder, he remains impassively depressed looking. He makes no acknowledgment that people are chanting his name in victory. His speech at the first battle, major battle, is truly inspiring. He delivers it with heartfelt passion, coming from a man who is being honest; trying to lead his countrymen in a fight for freedom not the Nobles' profit. And all the pain and anxiety, yet strength of will and character, come off perfectly in his final scene as he is brutally tortured. His face: unforgettable at every moment. Truly moving and powerful.
The direction is masterful. Here, Mel directs as as sharply as he acts. THe visuals are worthy of Peter Jackson, the battles are worthy of Ridley Scott, and the storytelling is worthy of Steven Spielberg. THe violence is intense, the battles being some of the most violent I've ever seen. It's not for the squeamish, but the violence is there to show the hardships of the fight for freedom. Mel holds no bars back. He unleashes medieval brutality. The final torture scene is brutal, but it shows Wallace's triumph to overcome it.
『玖』 勇敢的心英文影評,不要網上能找到的,最好能自己寫的,200字,大一水平
In this spectacular, historic movie a young Scotsman becomes the hero of his country, after his wife gets killed by the members of the English occupying force. In the beginning of the movie young William Wallace experience the death of his father and brother. They get killed by the English Kings Soldiers. After this he grows up with his uncle. Years later Wallace (Mel Gibson) returns back to the farm of his father to fall in love Murron (Catherine McCormack), the same girl who gave him a flower after the burial of his father and brother years ago. Because the English noblemen have the right to deflower every new married girl, Wallace marries Murron in secret. But the young luck won't last forlong. A few English soldiers try to rape Murron at a marketplace. Wallace tries to rescue her but the agressors can catch her and kill her right on the marketplace. When Wallace finds out about it, he takes revenge. He executes the murderers of his beloved. This ation is like a wake-up call for his fellow countrymen. They see him as their Leader to defeat the English occupying power. In their first battle the highlanders accomplish to defeat a numeral superior English Force. Wallace becomes an inspiration and more and more Scottish people follow him into war. Meanwhile in England the tyrannic King Edward the Longshankes (Patrick Mc Goohan) takes notice of the triumphs of Wallace. But this is not his only problem: His and heir apparent is a mollycoddled coward, who doesn't behave like his father would like to see it from a Prince. At least Edward the Longshakes arrange the marriage between his son and the lovely Princess Isabelle of France (Sophie Marceau). Besides this the Kings health is not the best anymore. But not only the English have their problems: The Scottish Landlords betray each other for more land and try to get more land for themselves from the English King. During the movie you'll see a lot of great filmed battles, two heart breaking love storys (first between Wallace and Murron, later in the movie young princess Isabelle falls in love with Wallace) and an exciting story about love, hate, patriotism, deception and heroism all in front of a wonderful landscape (the movie was actually set in Ireland). When you watch this movie, you'll be carried away by this powerful and always haunting epic and unterstand why there was no other chance than giving this movie 5 Oscars (including the award for the best film). It is a film who has it all: A great story, perfect filmed battles, one of the best soundtracks ever made (it is a shame, that the score didn't win an Oscar) and a hell of a cast. The role of William Wallace fits Mel Gibson perfect: heroic, romantic but always in a down to earth kind of way. Sophie Marceau and Catherine McCormack are lovely from their first appearance until the end of the film and Patrick McGoohan gives the most despicable (this is meant as a compliment) interpretation of an English King ever seen. This movie you can see over and over again and it never looses his magic and it is a movie you can watch with men and women as well: Men will love the great staged battles and women will love the lovestory.
在威廉·華萊士還是孩子的時候,他的父親,蘇格蘭的英雄馬索·華萊士在與英軍的斗爭中犧牲了。幼小的他在伯父的指導下學習文化和武術。 光陰似箭,英王愛德華為鞏固在蘇格蘭的統治,頒布法令允許英國貴族在自己蘇格蘭的封地上享有結婚少女的初夜權,以便讓貴族開發並統治蘇格蘭。王妃伊莎貝拉是個決斷的才女,她知道這道法令會有利於英國統治蘇格蘭,但更會激起蘇格蘭人民的反抗。年輕的威廉·華萊士學成回到故鄉,向美麗的少女梅倫求婚,並與其私定終身,願意做一個安分守己的人。然而梅倫卻被英國貴族無理搶去,並遭殺害,華萊士終於爆發了。在廣大村民高呼「英雄之後」的呼喊聲中,他們揭竿而起,殺英兵宣布起義。 蘇格蘭貴族羅伯想成為蘇格蘭領主,在其父布斯的教唆下,領導蘇格蘭貴族假意與華萊士聯盟。華萊士殺敗了前來進攻的英軍,蘇格蘭貴族議會封他為爵士,任命他為蘇格蘭護國公。華萊士卻發現這些蘇格蘭貴族考慮的只是自己的利益,絲毫不為人民和國家前途擔心。愛德華為了緩和局勢,派伊莎貝拉前去和談。但由於英王根本不考慮人民的自由和平等,只想以收買華萊士為條件,和談失敗了。伊莎貝拉回去後才發覺和談根本就是幌子,英王匯合了威爾士軍,愛爾蘭軍和法軍共同包圍華萊士的蘇格蘭軍隊,她趕緊送信給華萊士。大軍壓境之下,蘇格蘭貴族們慌作一團,華萊士領兵出戰,就在士氣高漲,勝利似乎快要來臨時,蘇格蘭貴族援軍卻逃離了戰場。華萊士決定孤注一擲,獨自追殺英王,卻意外發現了羅伯竟與英王勾結,不禁倍受打擊。 失敗後的華萊士憤怒的追殺所有背信棄義的貴族,卻放過了羅伯。王妃伊莎貝拉為華萊士的豪情傾倒,來到駐地向他傾吐了自己的真情,兩人陶醉在愛情的幸福之中。 感到後悔的羅伯再次提出合作並表示絕不再背叛。華萊士為了和平統一著想,他依舊答應前去。在愛丁堡陰險的布斯設計抓住華萊士,並把他送交英王。羅伯對父親的詭計感到怒不可遏,華萊士終於被判死刑。伊莎貝拉求情不成,在英王臨死前,她告訴英王她懷的不是王子的血脈而是華萊士的,而這個孩子未來將成為新的英王。 華萊士刑前高呼「自由」震撼所有人。幾星期後,在受封時,羅伯高呼為華萊士報仇的口號拒絕了英王的封賞,英勇地繼承華萊士的遺志對抗英軍,為蘇格蘭的自由繼續奮戰。
『拾』 《勇敢的心》英語影評,急
當蘇格蘭風笛的聲音奏響,鏡頭像戴在鳥的翅膀上一樣,幽雅地掠過藏青色的山巒,白霧從小河上升騰起再散開,鏡頭不斷地拉近,樹林間出現了人馬的影子,電影就開始了。一個男人的聲音在此時響起:「我將為你們講述威廉姆華萊士的故事,英國的歷史學家們會說我在說謊,但歷史是由處死英雄的人寫的……」在父兄的葬禮上,小Wallace在眾人的憐憫中沒有說話,一個人默默的感傷。更加年幼的Murron一直在關注著他,當眾人都離開的時候,小女孩掙脫了母親的手,從平靜的土地上摘下了一朵紫色的薊花送給小Wallace。當他接過花的時候,那是我在電影中唯一一次看見他的眼淚大滴大滴地流淌在眼眶之外。他的眼淚可以忍受看到被吊在房頂上扭轉著蒼白面容的屍體時恐懼,可以忍受失去至親時的莫大悲痛,卻承受不住一朵野花的關懷。說是宿命也好,他們此後的人生便因為這次的邂逅誰也逃不了對方的宿命。長大成人的他們在曾經的小村莊重逢,在教父的見證下秘密地完婚,在月色樹林中完成了人生中重要的成人禮,一切順理成章而無限平靜。正如Wallace所希望的那樣,他希望過著平靜的生活,成家、娶妻、生子。本來我以為他們的愛情會更加長久和轟烈一些的,沒想到卻因為Murron被英國的軍官割喉而死而讓他們的「在一起」戛然而止。
失去了愛人的Wallace再也找不到平靜的可能,心中註定屬於英雄的抗爭和對自由深深的信仰讓他成為了神話般的領袖。我看到的蘇格蘭的男人們是穿著裙子上戰場,光著屁股挑釁,光明正大地侮辱敵人的。為了所有的人而拋棄了自己的人就是英雄。成了英雄以後的Wallace用腦子打仗,用身體屠戮,捍衛自己除去愛人後最後的信仰。馬背上的人生盪氣回腸,刀光劍影中的鐵血柔情熱烈。
在金屬的鏗鳴和濺血的戰歌中,因為錯信,因為背叛,因為脆弱,戰場成了墳場,還穿著蘇格蘭裙的屍體互相壓著,插滿的刀劍,被騎兵的馬蹄碾碎的臉。婦女們在悲傷地尋找無數相似的屍體中屬於她們的丈夫、兄長、兒子、父親,無限悲涼殘酷。有人說,無數的生命被層層疊疊的沙土埋葬,直到沉陷到大地是最深處,一切的感情和生命一同消失。歷史的代價是慘重的,人類用血鑄造輝煌,用血鋪墊和平。
Wallace最後還是義無返顧地去奔赴用死亡換取的賭注,在最後等待死亡的過程中,他對愛著她的王妃說:「每個人都會死,但並不是每個人都真正的活過。」獨身一人的時候,在死亡前在獄中的最後一刻,他也會祈禱:「我很害怕,賜予我力量去面對死亡吧!」因為他也不知道他是否能在莫大的痛苦中將自己的信仰和尊嚴捍衛到最後。當英國的人民把他當作叛國罪人一樣唾棄,為他的即將死去而歡呼,當他看見刑場下兒童對著他的死而微笑的時候,我知道那樣的無知是一種莫大的傷害。當他飽受疼痛,在生命的最後,深深地吸滿最後一口氣,在眾人都以為他請求開恩的時候,他用一生的力量大喊了一聲:「freedom
」本來我以為只要我不說話,我就不會哭的。但是在那一刻,我竟不知不覺讓眼淚流了下來。十年前,也有很多人曾經為這樣的一幕哭過。這是一種深深的震撼。
Wallace終究是死了,曾經兩度失信的Bruce在陣前對著蘇格蘭人,深深地吸一口氣,喊道:「你們曾經和華萊士一起流血!」他抽出長劍來,「現在,請你們跟我一起流血吧!」
蘇格蘭高地人振奮了,他們發出了震天動地的叫喊聲:「Wallace——Wallace——」於是,他們打得如詩一般美麗,打得一點都不失蘇格蘭人的面子,為自己贏得了Wallace同樣信仰和追求的自由和勝利。
那把無數次在Wallace手中出現的劍被插在一大片綠地上,劍柄上紅色的綢帶一直飄揚到影片的最後,就像是勝利者的墓誌銘。
蘇格蘭風笛再次響徹的時候,我已經無法繼續平靜了。勇敢的心像英雄一樣的難得。
我相信,電影是活生生的藝術。但是生活是更加真實的,赤裸裸的電影。