電影wonder英文影評
A. 阿凡達 英文影評 最好通俗易懂
1.The movie is directed by James Cameron, who is famous with proct Tatanic.It took 14 years prepare for the movie,4 years time for filming and will be released on 2ed January 2010.It cost 500 million and became the largested investment in history. The story is about immigration to planet Pandora, and what happened with local NA'VI.
I like him, because he is very brave, and very clever. He is a good man. This film is very good, it is so excited, and it is to shake, it is so exciting. At the beginning of, he is helps the human being, but he does not like the human being break the alien』s home, so he help the alien attack the human being. At last he is the winner. And he is change to the alien .He project the alien』s environment. He is a good man. I like this film very much.
2. Yesterday I went to watch 3D IMAX 'Avatar' with my mother and the teachers in her school. I have to admit that the film is such a wonder that I thought it is well worth watching in one's whole life. 'Avatar' is not just a film. Yes the view in it is really beautiful, charming, amazing, wonderful...I can use hundreds of words to describe what I saw. The film is not just about the love story between a 'human' and a NA'VI princess, but also a ecational file.
The film has something in common with the USA history. The NA'VI people live on the planet called Pandora, seems like the Indian people who used to live on the America continent. They first welcomed the new guys who came to settled on the new land. They gave them food, provide them with warm clothing, and taught them the living skills, including how to hunt, to build house... But soon everything changed. The settlers became robbers. They robbed many things of the Indians, and treated them very bad, even began to drive them out of their living places. The Indians became homeless. What a shame! The new settlers treated their benedictory in such a curl way. How cold blood they were.
In this film, the char actors were just changed. The Americans are changed into human beings, and the local Indians turn into the NA'VI people on the Pandora. They begin to rob again. They, or should I say 'we' are miserly. We have already damaged too much on the earth. The environment has been destroyed, the water has been wasted, the air has been polluted, the forest has been cut, millions of animals have been killed and we can never see them again. It is just so sad! I just cannot stand it. We must live in harmony with the nature.
On the U.N. Climate Change conference, which was held in Copenhagen, Denmark, our Chinese government published our aim, recing the Carbon Dioxide. The USA government did not promise anything, they just focus on their own instry development. Do they really want to act like what the film has shown? Though I admire Mr. Osama, I can't understand why he did this.
In the film, I saw a Circumstances, the commander told the soldier that the NA'VI people believe that the Eywa would bless them everybody laughed at it. Because they don't have anything to believe in. Or can I say they just believe in themselves. It is so sad! People hang together because they have the same belief. But the soldiers in this film, have completed been cold blood killer. What did they fight for? For resources? Then they're robbers. For the commander's orders? Then they're idiot...
My men it's time to wake up! It's time for us to hang together just like brothers and sisters, to fight for our living areas. Come on!
譯文：
昨天我和我母親還有她學校里的其他老師去看IMAX 3D版的「阿凡達」了.不得不承認,這電影真是奇跡,我想在人的一生中相當值得一看.「阿凡達」並不只是一部電影.是的,那裡面的畫面真是美麗又迷人,精彩又奇特…我能用上百個詞來描述我的所見.這電影並不僅僅是一個關於人類和納美公主的愛情故事,還是一部具有教育意義的片子.
這電影和美國歷史有些類似.納美人住在一個叫潘多拉的星球上,看上去像以前住在美洲大陸上的印第安人.他們起初歡迎來到新大陸安身的新朋友.他們給他們食物和衣服並且教他們如何打獵如何造房子…之類的生存技巧.但不久後一切都變了.移民們變成了強盜.他們從印第安人那搶了許多東西並且對待他們態度惡劣,甚至逐漸把他們趕出他們的住所.印第安人無家可歸了.太可恥了!新的移民用這種殘忍的方式對待他們的恩人.他們是多麼冷血啊.
這部片子只是更換了角色.美國人換成了人類,土著印第安人換成了潘多拉星球上的納美人.他們又一次搶劫了.他們,或許我應該稱為「我們」是不幸的.我們早已在地球上破壞地太多了.環境被毀滅,水被浪費,空氣被污染,森林被砍伐,數以百萬計的動物被殺戮,我們再也見不到他們了.這真是太可悲了!我真是不能忍受.我們必須和自然和諧共存.
在丹麥的哥本哈根舉行的聯合國氣候變化會議上,我們中國政府公開了我們的目標,降低二氧化碳.而美國政府沒有任何承諾,他們只關系他們自己的工業發展.他們真想照著電影里放的那樣做嗎?雖然我很崇拜奧巴馬先生,但我無法理解他為什麼這么做.
電影里我看見一個場景,酋長告訴士兵們納美人相信聖母伊娃會保佑他們的,所有人都笑了.因為他們沒有什麼信仰.或者說他們只相信他們自己.這太悲哀了!人們互相支持因為他們有相同的信仰.但是片中的戰士們已是完完全全的冷血殺手.他們為什麼而戰?為了資源?那麼他們就是強盜.為了上級的命令?那麼他們是白痴…
我們人類,是時候覺醒了!是時候團結起來情同姐妹般,為我們的居住區而戰了.加油吧.
B. 電影《神奇女俠》觀後感
電影《神奇女俠》觀後感
《神奇女俠》電影為我們呈現了一個女英雄的成長過程。下面電影《神奇女俠》觀後感是我想跟大家分享的，歡迎大家瀏覽。
電影《神奇女俠》觀後感一
什麼叫力量與美的結合，愛與智慧的化身?什麼叫浩氣凜然的性感?什麼叫山峙淵渟的萌?什麼叫所向披靡，什麼叫無所不能?讓神奇女俠告訴你!
9點多看完點映到現在心情都不能平靜。一直覺得DC這兩年連漫威一個手指頭都干不過，不成想放出個這么無敵的大招。
神奇女俠這個角色簡直是集這個世界上所有的美好於一身，除了手指頭稍微有一點肉乎之外，渾身上下由內而外一丁點的缺陷和槽點都沒有。給我三炷香我立刻就能給她跪下的那種。不是什麼神一樣的存在，根本就是女神本尊。
相比神奇女俠的譯名，英文片名wonder woman和女俠本人才更般配，真·一位完美無瑕的女性。
看電影的時候哭了3次，分別是神奇女俠脫衣服的時候，神奇女俠脫衣服的時候和神奇女俠脫衣服的時候。良心影評，不劇透，看完電影你一定能懂。
建議這個片子能在中國重男輕女的地區和印度長年不間斷放映，讓那些人好好瞻觀瞻觀，連眾神之王的宙斯都深知萬事還得靠女兒，你們這些愚蠢的人類還不趕緊悟道!看看神奇女俠，她一個人，拯救了她爹，拯救了人類，拯救了世界，也拯救了DC。所以說，對女孩們好一點吧，指不定哪一天，她就拯救了你們呢。
電影《神奇女俠》觀後感二
在每一個她背負著決心與毅力走上戰場，迎接槍火的時候，我的內心既被什麼點燃著，又因什麼抽痛著。
因為我跟她不一樣，我知道她的結局，我知道她“會失望的”，在所有的紛爭都塵埃落定的時候，她會明白的，有些東西她決定不了，有些東西不是她所認識的。
這多麼像一個“人”來到這個世界上，總要經歷煙火和槍炮後的痂里才能長出繭子來，用自己的肉身才能得出感悟來。
我們都learn from a hard way。沒有人例外。
其次，我對朋友說，我哭抽的點跟“漫畫”那部分已經沒太多關系了，我哭抽的點基本都在電影把我理解的希臘神話和“人類”與“神”表現得太淋漓盡致了。
曾經的黛安娜那麼堅信著那個故事：人出生即是“善”，只是他們被阿瑞斯下了蠱惑，在他們原本純潔的心靈上施下了“仇恨”與“惡”的咒，才讓人間有了殘忍的爭斗。這是在她心中從小種下的種子，所以她才深信著人類“善”的天性，在成長中具備了一切美好的品質。
可是故事只是故事，說的人講給聽的人。而現實永遠比故事復雜。
當她走入飄著黑煙的工業中心——倫敦的時候，她才第一次真實地站在了這個叫做“世界”的地方，而她看到的是與自己認識中完全不同的景象。
說她幼稚也好，說她天真也罷，她是個從孤島上的阿瑪宗部落出來的女人，天生對這個世界的規則毫無常識。在這里，女人們大多穿著不便行動的衣物，可社會對她們的刻板印象帶來的條條框框，對於一個還沒有被規則所束縛的女人是沒有意義的。她的整個存在都與這個社會的規則不相適應，她的每一個舉動都是對“憑什麼女人不能”的問題最有力的論證。
(電影對此的表現多麼自然啊!那個社會的人對此都認為理所當然，卻只有不屬於那個社會的黛安娜和熒幕前的你我看得出這“異樣”。而為什麼有些人還要以此批評這部電影呢?我想說，能看出問題其實是對比歷史的進步啊!現代擁有的而那時沒有的，都是平權運動的成果。為什麼不承認這樣的進步而更上一層樓，反而要反感這樣的進步!)
可是這些還不夠。男人對女人的歧視還不是那個社會里最大的問題所在，她最看不懂的，還是人類的見死不救與互相殘殺。
她大聲疾問：“為什麼你放任那些士兵那些人民不管!任由無辜被屠殺，任由絕望的人們死去!”
“為什麼人類要殺害同樣是人類的其他人!”
她胸腔里的那股熱血在萌芽，早年種下的種子已經抽出了枝與葉，馬上就結出果。
她說：這一切必定是阿瑞斯重返人間的作為，他邪惡地，再一次施下了“惡”的咒語!這片土地上會生靈塗炭!這個世界要在他的邪惡中沉淪!而殺了他便是唯一的辦法!
可是，“惡”，從來不是神的特權。
她看著滿目瘡痍的戰場;她看著面目頹萎、肢體殘缺的士兵，流離失所、陷入絕望的普通人，哀嚎遍地，她從來不知道煉獄可以在人間，她從來不明白這些。
然後她用那顆還深信著人類擁有“善”的心問道：是不是沒有了戰爭，人類會開心地生活?他們會做些什麼呢?像這樣翩翩起舞嗎?喝著酒，唱著歌，相知的不相知的人情同手足，圍坐在一起?
是啊，這樣多麼美好。
美好的人類。
在絕望面前還能團結地擁抱著一起共赴命運的人類。
深信著愛與美好的人類。
會自我犧牲的人類。
同時，轉過身去就可以為了征服而使用殺傷性武器的也是人類。
這些都是人類。
他們不是由純粹的善念所鑄造的，他們是神不完美的產物。
他們可能是“善”也可能是“惡”，他們是一切事物的美好與不美好。
他們可以選擇完全不同的今天，明天，每一天。
人類也許不自知這一切，但是倘若是一個天神的話，TA就該看得到這些。
“惡”不是天神的特權，“善”也不是。
天神應當信任他們，守護他們，只因還有哪怕一絲的美麗與善良存在於人間。可天神同時也是漂浮於人類以外的存在，人類的一切，既與他們息息相關，又與他們毫無瓜葛。
看到他們大戰的時候，我滿腦子都是這些，所以我哭到洶涌得無法收拾。
因為我從這部電影中看出的“神”與“人”的關系是多麼符合我的認知啊!即使我從看完預告的第一天，閱讀各種報道字里行間的第一刻開始，我就知道這是一個“與神無關，與人有關”的故事，我還是被感動得一塌糊塗。
那些課堂上看到的希臘陶藝文物，那些曾經聽到的希臘神話故事，彷彿就是為了這一刻而存在的!
這部電影，真實地展現了我所理解的一切!!!
戰爭，那是人們所認為的“神的爭執”，一切的勝敗都是神對人的影響，是神與神之間對抗的結局。
你猜怎麼著，古希臘人認為特洛伊的戰爭背後是諸神的較量，而雅典的繁榮都歸功於女戰神雅典娜的全心庇護。
可是不是的!
辯證唯物說，神都是人的映射，所以曾經原始的崇拜中認為的“神”都是“人”，神所做的，即是人所做的。
站到現實的角度上，從一開始就明白，這“神的戰爭”是不存在的，存在的只是人類的不美好而已。
這部電影真實地回歸了這樣的主題。
如果這個世界真的有神的話，他們會看到的，“人”與他們是一樣的，有愛也有恨，有不同的個體，會做不同的選擇。
所以，神並不是全知而全能的。
所以，神即是人。
如果說還有什麼區別的話，就是有能力的人更應當明白守護和信任。
這難道，不就是“英雄”之所在嗎?
寫到這里，我不知道還能說什麼了。
向那個笑對死亡的史蒂夫致以敬意吧，他背後代表的大概是無數不為人知的，身處戰爭中依舊相信世間美好的無名英雄。
正因為有這樣的'人類存在，我們才被神繼續以慈祥的目光注視著、信任著、堅守著。
然後，“men are still good".
最後伴著Sia的主題曲，to be human is to love, even when it gets too much, I’m not ready to give up
我想這與那句“the world is a fine place and worth fighting for and I hate very much to leave it“大概是同質的。
大抵只有經歷過命運的惡意的人，才理解“愛”是多麼難，又多麼可貴吧。
即使這樣，她從痛苦的經歷中領悟到了，“神”要到這人間來。
她從“神”變成了“人”。
to be human
電影《神奇女俠》觀後感三
1.不僅僅是超級英雄片，也是女性成長史。
神奇女俠是眾神之王宙斯與亞馬遜女王希波呂忒的女兒。有著媲美大力神海格力斯的力量，如同愛與美之女神阿芙羅狄忒般的容顏，似智慧女神雅典娜一樣博學。美漫史上首個女性超級英雄主角，原漫畫誕生於1941年。她是正義聯盟創始人之一，在DC系列漫畫里擁有特殊的地位。期待電影版已久，源於漫畫，但精彩程度高於漫畫，沒讓人失望。
本片是DC首部女性超級英雄電影，也是一部女性成長史。黛安娜起初對於世界，對於人類，充滿著善意。她認為人之初，性本善。不懼自身安危，從天堂島出山，只為消滅戰神阿瑞斯，讓世界得到和平。後來在第一次世界大戰中。看到人類官僚的丑惡嘴臉，見識了太多的自相殘殺，世界觀都崩塌了。她逐漸改變自己的想法，覺得人性本惡。
任務小隊其他成員，都是有著缺點的普通人。騙子想當演員，卻因為膚色，身不由己成了士兵。狙擊手原本愛音樂，因為戰爭，患了戰後創傷症，借酒澆愁，成了酒鬼。酋長則是失去了家園的印第安人，流落在外，在戰爭中販賣物品謀生。他們曾是為錢而戰的雇傭兵。但為了結束戰爭，不惜以身犯險，成了英雄。平凡人給了黛安娜最初的感動，讓她了解人類有善有惡復雜的性格。而史蒂夫更是寧願犧牲自我，完成理想。我來拯救今天，你來拯救世界。因為愛，不讓世界毀滅。因為愛，而拯救人間，黛安娜完成了從懵懂小公舉，到神奇女俠的蛻變。
2.女性視角超級英雄片，有動作更有柔情。
本片導演派蒂·傑金斯，從女性視角拍超級英雄片，在保證動作場面的同時，有著不一樣的細膩情感。人物性格豐滿，電影完成度較高。有幾個場景，頗為打動人。亞馬遜女戰士們，冷兵器對抗槍炮，死在德軍的子彈下，悲壯感十足，讓人難過。而黛安娜從戰壕沖向無人區的時候，讓人心潮澎湃，雖千萬人吾往矣。
故事人設，受古希臘神話影響很深。戰神阿瑞斯與宙斯之戰，延續了弒父情結的悲劇設計。而阿瑞斯與黛安娜，則是兩個極端。雖然都英勇善戰，但兩個武神性格截然不同。阿瑞斯殘忍嗜殺，到處引起人類戰爭。而黛安娜愛好和平，以戰止戰，結束人類的自相殘殺。
構圖場景美輪美奐，特效與動作場面相得益彰。以往的超級英雄片，硬度夠，大場面好看，但缺乏感情戲。本片除了打鬥場面精彩，感情線處理的也頗為吸引人。史蒂夫保護黛安娜，讓她不被世界所欺騙。黛安娜救史蒂夫，讓他產生崇拜之情。兩人地位平等，甜甜小初戀，好一對金童玉女。
3.英姿颯爽，角色與演員相互成就。
從演員表現來看，蓋爾·加朵本色詮釋了黛安娜·普林斯這個角色。她身為2004年以色列小姐，還曾在軍營里服役過，這些獨特的人生經歷，賦予了獨特的魅力。不但顏值高，身材健美，真·腿玩年。身上有著屬於女戰士的英雄氣概，怎一個英姿颯爽了得。頭戴星光飛冕，手執噬神劍，神力護盾，腰別真言套索，神奇女俠上戰場那刻吸粉無數。
克里斯·派恩，其實早已通過《星際迷航》中的柯克船長證明了他的演技。而在《神奇女俠》中，笑容甜，身材好，還長著一張大義凜然的臉。穿衣顯瘦，脫衣顯瘦。是空軍上尉，是間諜，更是英雄。史蒂夫·特雷弗絲毫不奶油，也不讓人感到膩味。
配角方面，盧平教授大衛·休里斯，這次出演的戰神阿瑞斯，角色光芒完全被神奇女俠壓制，但那股陰險的狠勁，詮釋出來了，演技到位。
有精彩的打鬥場景，有激烈的戰爭場面，有細膩的情感線索，有復雜的人物性格。《神奇女俠》完成度很高，女導演對於角色的情感塑造，豐滿了整部電影，不至於剝除打鬥場面之後，故事乾巴巴。期待續作，也期待更多女超級英雄的登場!
;C. 博物館奇妙夜第一部的英文影評，200字左右，不要電影內容介紹，要直接評論的
1
I must admit, the idea behind Night at the Museum is very clever. At night at the natural history museum in New York the exhibits come to life and wreak havoc thanks to a mummy's curse. It's up to the new night security guard Larry (Ben Stiller) to keep the chaos from spilling out into the streets of New York and keep the exhibits from perishing in the light of day.
Larry is left this task after three longtime night guards, played by legends Dick Van Dyke, Mickey Rooney and Bill Cobbs, are let go. Let's just say they are a little bitter about being let go. They are kind enough to leave Larry an instruction manual but when Larry gets cocky, thinking he knows how to handle this situation, things go from weird to worse.
Larry would not have taken this job but his ex-wife Erica (Kim Raver) threatened to take away his son Nick (Jake Cherry) if he didn't find a steady job and place to live. No points for guessing that Nick will get in on the museum madness. You also get no points that the pretty museum tour guide, played by Spy Kids star Carla Gugino, will become Larry's love interest.
The best part of Night at the Museum is Robin Williams as President Teddy Roosevelt. Coming to life nightly to ride his horse throughout the museum, Williams' Mr. President is the most helpful of the museum exhibits and of course when it comes to delivering the moral of the story who better than a former President. Of course, Williams can't help but ham it up a little, but you expect that from Robin Williams.
Ben Stilller seems at a loss to keep up with the goofy CGI madness of Night at the Museum. Rushed through the exposition, his character is essnetially a deadbeat who nearly loses his kid because he's so lazy. Not exactly a winning character. Once inside the museum, Stiller's Larry vacillates from coward to cocky but mostly just runs around confused and angry.
Director Shawn Levy and writers Garant and Lennon hit all of the typical family movie beats, a lesson learned, bathroom humor and a monkey. They also toss in a couple action movie cliches for good measure including a chase scene involving an ancient stage coach and a miniature SUV. Trust me, my description reads far more interesting than the actual scene.
2
This whole movie is one giant leap into the magical realm of suspended reality that Hollywood is so good at creating. Can museums really come to life? No --- but man, it be cool if they did. Keep your eye out for my favorite (and in my opinion, the funniest) scene from the film in which Larry finally confronts Attila the Hun, who makes a habit of chasing him down and attempting to dismember him each night. Larry squares off against Attila and his barbaric horde, and proves he's in control by bringing Attila to tears. You have to see it to truly appreciate the humor. I also enjoyed the keys stealing monkey, Dexter, and his crazy penchant for causing Larry a lot of trouble. As far as special features go, this particular disc only has 2 audio commentaries available. If you're wanting more than that in the special features department, you're probably better off purchasing the 2-disc special edition.
3
The movie is almost exactly as you expected it to be. CG fun, family friendly with a soft conflict and cute resolution. It did everything it was supposed to and felt very formulaic. The movie earned a few giggles out of me, but I am not calling it the comedy event of last year. I think if you have kids this movie would be perfect for them. It is light, cute and has some cool imagination behind it. It had a very Jumanji/Zanthura feel to it, but even lighter still.
Some of the CG was very good. Like the Dinosaur that we all saw in the preview. He was awesome. Some of it was not so good, really bad layering and backdrops, it felt very rushed and is very noticeable to the normal movie watcher. It kinda leaves you going hmm, that looks kinda weird. Its not as bad as it could be, but you do see it and makes me wonder, if they ran out of money and had to skim a bit.
The movie comes with a truck load of actors in the movie. All of whom did fine. I didn't feel love for anyone, but I wasn't turned off by anything either, this movie did just what it needed to, to get by. [tag]Ben Stiller[/tag] was normal Ben Stiller, doing his normal guy thing. No character, no surprises as far as that goes.
I think it's rentable for sure, and if you have kids, its a for sure recommendation. I would think it would still be a good choice to take them to see in the theater, if you are looking for something for them, and don't want to go see Bridge to Terabithia this weekend.
4
I was surprised at how much I enjoyed this one. Yes it's silly and predominantly a children's movie, but it also had some humor in it for the alts. I guess it reminded me of all the old Bugs Bunny cartoons I grew up watching. I enjoyed them as a child, but watching them again as an alt I saw whole other levels of humor that I never got as a kid. There were a lot of great comedians in this one, too. Ben Stiller, Owen Wilson, Robin Williams, etc. Stiller takes a job as a night watchman in a museum only to find out that the exhibits come to life after closing. Chaos ensues. It's not high drama filled with cutting social commentary, but you'll at least laugh.
5
I am so impressed that there was no bad language or sex in the movie. I am not sure if the mom had a live in boyfriend or not but if she did they didn't focus on it so your kid may not even pay attention to it. Being a Ben Stiller movie it was not as funny as I expected because I was expecting a laugh all the way through and loud movie but it was a normal comedy. I am giving it a 5 star rating because it had top-notch actors and the creators and actors were able to keep it clean, something rare in the movies.
D. 英語電影觀後感60字
英語電影觀後感60字，關於 電影觀後感英語怎麼說 ，下面我為你帶來 電影觀後感英語作文 ，歡迎閱讀參考，謝謝!
英語電影觀後感60字【1】
my personal favorite "101D" medium is Disney's "101 Dalmatians: the Series". It combines many themes of the existing material (Dodie Smith book, 1961 and 1996 movies). But still does its own things, too.
Our main pups include brave Lucky, who gets a strong personality mirroring his character in the book, lovable Rolly, the gourmand of the pups, and sweet little Cadpig, who is the true runt of the litter. Also there is Spot the chicken, who longs to be a dog. I find them all extremely amiable and enjoyable to watch.
They are usually foiling Cruella's schemes for their land, or outwitting Lt. Pug (I'll get to him later), or sneaking into Grutely, or...just having fun, ma-ki-ng a very likable show.
英語電影觀後感【2】
20** is actually an captivating film with some spectacular effects scenes. Cusack is great as the everyman hero. Ejiofor grabs your attention as the young government scientist trying to prepare for the inevitable. Glover and Harrison are also effective in smaller roles: Glover as the resolute President, and Harrison as the wackjob conspiracy theorist who might not be so crazy after all.
Many other characters are merely stereotypes (like the Russian) or one dimensional (like the wife), but let's be honest, it's not the characters that we're coming to see. If you are, you'll probably be disappointed.
20** is not great but it entertains as a doomsday thriller.
一本書的書名、一部電影或電視劇的`片名往往含意豐富，有些還含有成語典故，需要仔細推敲、弄清原意，然後再決定譯名。總的說來，書名、電影或電視劇的片名的翻譯要求傳情達意、簡短易記、文字優美，並應和其內容吻合。其具體譯法大致可分為以下4種：
(一)直譯
The Canterbury Tales 《坎特伯雷故事集》;The Prince and the Pauper 《王子和貧兒》
The Adventures of Alice in Wonderland 《艾麗絲漫遊記》
The Great Expectation 《遠大前程》;A Tale of Two Cities 《雙城記》
Aesop's Fables 《伊索寓言》;Sister Carrie 《嘉麗妹妹》
Vanity Fair《名利撤;A Farewell to Arms《永別了，武器》
The Merry Wives of Windsor《溫莎的風流娘兒們》
The Age of Innocence《純真年代》;Dances with Wolves《與狼共舞》
http://www.oh100.com/a/201203/63307.htmlJurassic Park《侏羅紀公園》
以上各個譯名流傳已久，均應遵從約定俗成的原則繼續使用，不再重譯。
(二)直譯與意譯
St. Mark《馬克福音》;Robinson Crusoe 《魯賓遜漂流記》
The Mayor of Casterbridge《卡斯特橋市長》;Dombey and Son《董貝父子》
A River Runs Through It《一條流過記憶的河》;Sleeplein Seattle《西雅圖夜未眠》
Patton《巴頓將軍》;The Net《網路情緣》
Moonstruck《月色撩人》;Sand and Blood《碧血黃沙》
(三)意譯
Uncle Tom's Cabin《黑奴籲天錄》(試比較：《湯姆叔的小屋》)
David Copperfield《塊肉餘生述》
本文來源於百分網(http://www.oh100.com/)，轉載請保留此標記，謝謝!Silas Marner 《織工馬南傳》(試比較：《塞那斯·馬南》)
The Bridges of Madison County《廊橋遺夢》(試比較：《梅德遜郡橋》)
First Knight《劍俠風流》;Sabrina《情歸巴黎》
Oliver Twist 《霧都孤兒》;Pygmalion 《皮格馬利翁》
Red Star Over China 《西行漫記》 ; Gone with the Wind 《亂世佳人》
Pinocchio 《木偶奇遇記》;As You Like It《皆大歡喜》
The Pilgrim's Progress《天路歷程》;For Whom the Bell Tolls《戰地鍾聲》
(四)音譯
Jane Eye 《簡.愛》;Robin Hood 《羅賓漢》
Martin Eden 《馬釘伊登》
E. 電影奇跡男孩英語簡介
《奇跡男孩》網路網盤免費資源下載：
鏈接:
August "Auggie" Pullman (Jacob Tremblay) is a 10-year-old boy living in North River Heights in upper Manhattan, New York. He has a rare medical facial deformity, which he refers to as "mandibulofacial dysostosis". Due to 27 surgeries, Auggie has been home-schooled by his mother, Isabel (Julia Roberts), but as Auggie is approaching fifth grade, Isabel and Auggie's father, Nate (Owen Wilson),decide to enroll him in Beecher Prep, a mainstream private school。
F. 電影奇跡男孩英文觀後感100字
電影奇跡男孩英文觀後感是：
1、英文觀後感：
Films occasionally fall into the stereotype of children's films, which are too cute and create inappropriate humor for young groups.
However, the film's ultimate success not only tells a complex story, but also conveys the experience of confusion, loneliness and fear to the audience.
2、中文翻譯：
影片偶爾也落入兒童電影的窠臼，顯得過於可愛和為低齡群體製造不恰當的幽默。不過，影片最終成功不只是講述一個復雜的故事，而且給觀眾傳達了少年經歷困惑、孤獨和害怕的體驗。
劇情簡介：
天生面部缺陷的小男孩奧吉，從小由母親在家裡教導，五年級時，他終於有機會進入普通的學校學習。初進學校的奧吉因為自己的長相受到同學們的嘲笑和欺負，但是在父親、母親、姐姐、老師以及好友的幫助下，他最終找到了自信，並用自己的行動改變了其他人的看法。
G. 如何評價電影《神奇女俠》（Wonder Woman）
在BVS中，蝙蝠俠曾對超人說了這么一句話：
「You're not brave. Men are brave.」（你並不勇敢，人類才勇敢）
看到史蒂夫駕著滿是毒氣彈的飛機駛入長空，鏡頭拉近到他臉龐，他帶著欣慰和豪情，像那類擅長捲入一場魯莽不計後果的冒險的美國人，咧嘴大笑，然後開槍，欣然赴死，彷彿赴一場美麗的約會。
從那一刻起，蝙蝠俠這句沙啞低沉的話就跳入了我的腦海，再回望整部《神奇女俠》，就會發現，盡管黛安娜是當之無愧的第一主角，但是作為綠葉的史蒂夫並未因此失卻魅力，反而難得地和這個氣場強大的半神幾乎平分秋色，共同撐起了這部電影。
在這一點上，要感謝導演派蒂·傑金絲，沒有如外界先前的擔憂那般，把這部電影拍成簡單的「女權主義傳聲筒」。恰恰相反，正因為男女主角的共同出彩，性別平等的觀念以最自然的方式傳遞出來：我做這件事，與我的性別無關，僅僅是因為，我有能力、而且我也應該去做。黛安娜是如此，史蒂夫也是如此。
派蒂以一個女性導演所特有的細膩，將男女主角的性格都刻畫得恰到好處。這並不簡單。仔細想來，黛安娜初入人世時，性格單純，近乎幼稚，她堅持黑白分明的善惡二元論，認為人類本質是善的，只要打倒蠱惑人心的阿瑞斯，戰爭自然會平息。這種孩子氣的想法，假如處理不好，很容易引起觀眾的反感，但派蒂很好地把握了這個「度」，黛安娜雖然單純，但不愚笨，雖然執著，但懂變通，她與史蒂夫以及史蒂夫所代表的人類社會的幾次沖突，都只是點到即止，沒有過分窮究下去，在指揮部里對諸位軍官的斥責是相對激烈的一次交鋒，但也很快被史蒂夫阻斷。既讓觀眾通過黛安娜的視角看到了人類社會的荒謬，並有所反思，又不至於讓觀眾覺得她僅僅是個傻白甜。
突破無人區是神奇女俠整部電影的高光時刻，甚至使得最後和阿瑞斯的「神仙打架」相形失色。前半部戲里女俠目睹了人類社會一個又一個的慘狀，怯懦而草菅人命的軍官激起了她的憤怒，無人區壕塹里民眾的哀嚎也深深刺激了她，只是因為史蒂夫一遍遍的提醒，她才忍耐至今，然而她善良的內心終於驅使她做出選擇：「阻止毒氣彈是你（史蒂夫）的任務，我的任務就是要拯救這些無辜的人。」隨即邁出了壕塹，情緒的鋪墊、爆發一氣呵成，觀眾之前郁積的憤怒與難過，隨著女俠無畏的沖鋒宣洩而出。
近幾年，超級英雄電影都開始以探討超級英雄的權責問題為熱點，試圖更深入挖掘英雄的復雜性，這也使得銀幕上那些熟悉的英雄們臉上越來越陰郁沉重、苦大仇深。然而神奇女俠的這一次邁步喚回了超級英雄電影的初衷，即宣揚人們內心最樸素的正義感。超級英雄最本真的含義至此重新回歸人們的視野： I can not stand the persecution of innocent life. If no one else guards the world, then I will come forward. （無辜的生命慘遭迫害，我不能無動於衷。如果沒有別人保衛這個世界，那麼我將挺身而出）
相比黛安娜，史蒂夫的刻畫其實更考驗功力。因為神奇女俠作為一個半神，她的能力太強大了，強大到幾乎所有問題都能獨力解決。在這種不講道理的強大下，史蒂夫能發揮的餘地似乎很小。BVS里露易絲的「被救的花瓶」命運很大可能復制到史蒂夫身上。
但是派蒂敏銳地抓住了史蒂夫的兩重身份：男性，人類。這兩點都是與黛安娜的「女性半神」身份相對應的。電影實質上是神奇女俠的成長歷程，在黛安娜初入人類社會時，她對這個復雜灰色的世界一片懵懂，史蒂夫實際上是人類社會的代表，塑造著黛安娜對人類的看法。可以說，女俠最終沒有對人類失去信心，和史蒂夫最初對她的引導密不可分。
史蒂夫最大的優點在於知進退，且總能迅速找出當前情況的最優解。這是一個間諜所必備的素質。這種靈活務實的態度，使他沒有那個年代流行的大男子主義毛病，對一個人的評判只看他/她是否有用，而不關心其性別，見識了黛安娜的強大實力，馬上退居二線，做好支援，極端的實用主義反而暗含了性別平等的因子。在上級們驚呼「你怎麼把一個女人帶進會議室」時，史蒂夫卻不以為意，只是關心能否完成任務。
誠然，從黛安娜的價值觀來看，史蒂夫遠算不上一個「好人」——在一個充斥著謊言、殺戮、背叛的世界裡，除了間諜內心的信念支撐，沒人會提醒他們該如何保持自我。更何況，史蒂夫為了完成任務是可以不擇手段的：召集雞鳴狗盜之徒行動，用「美男計」挑逗毒葯博士，更別提戳痛黛安娜的無視傷亡民眾，徑直奔向目標的做法（雖然實情是史蒂夫確實無能為力，但他現實得近乎冷漠的態度才是激怒黛安娜的原因）。
但是，當黛安娜因為殺死「阿瑞斯」（魯登道夫）人類卻仍不停止戰爭，而陷入信念崩塌時，史蒂夫的勇氣則真正顯露出來。他沖黛安娜喊道：
「你以為我不希望把這一切戰爭歸結到一個人身上嗎？你以為我已經多少次看過這些殺戮了，我也想有人來告訴我，人類為何要如此互相殘殺？」
但他仍然說：「重要的不是值不值得，而是你相信什麼。」
這一刻，身為人類的史蒂夫綻放出神性的光芒，他比黛安娜看到了更多殘酷的事實，黛安娜還能有「殺死阿瑞斯」的信念支撐，而史蒂夫從一開始就沒有答案，只能憑自己的信念說服自己堅持下去。正如老話所說：
世界上只有一種英雄主義，那就是認清生活的真相後依然熱愛它。
可以說，黛安娜直到史蒂夫犧牲前，都還只是黛安娜，而不是神奇女俠。因為她的純真與善良是未染俗塵的璞玉，還未被粗糲的現實打磨過。而在她崩潰的那一刻，普通人的史蒂夫比起她更像一個英雄。
於是《神奇女俠》的精神內核與BVS成功連接起來，甚至比起BVS僅僅是蝙蝠俠一句台詞的說明，《神奇女俠》的傳遞更加自然完整。
黛安娜的純真支撐起了影片的前半段，她的勇氣來源於對人類的憐憫和對自身實力的自信，但這還不是真正的勇敢，因為她無法真正體會到人類作為弱者的無力與絕望。而史蒂夫支撐起了影片的後半段的希望，將英雄的第二重含義補全了，他深刻理解到自己作為一個普通個體，在時代大潮下的脆弱無力，但他依然沒有放棄，依然深信自己的哪怕一點點行動，也能將這個社會稍稍掰向好的方向，這是一種更加人性、更加深刻的勇氣。所以在他理解了黛安娜的強大後，才會說出「 我拯救今天，而你拯救世界」這句話。
我知道你的強大能力，但我也依然有我能做到的事，如果能讓這個世界變好一點，那我甘當你騰躍而起的那塊踏板。在拯救世界的道路上，我們沒有高低之分，只有分工不同。
相比起黛安娜的初戀，史蒂夫更多的是黛安娜對人類第一印象的樣板。幸運的是，史蒂夫既展現了人類的復雜性，又保有了人類彌足珍貴的品質，史蒂夫的犧牲不僅成為了黛安娜爆發的契機，也使她完成了從「半神」到「英雄」——亦即真正的神奇女俠——的涅槃。史蒂夫以生命為代價向黛安娜展示了人類的高貴與無畏，使得黛安娜在破除了對人類單純的幻想後，還能繼續相信他們。
至此，半神的黛安娜藉助普通人的史蒂夫踏上了堅實的大地。當神性光環褪去，神奇女俠不再是高懸蒼穹之上的救世主，而是與人類相伴而行的英雄。
「You're not brave. Men are brave.」（你並不勇敢，人類才勇敢）
正是有了人性，神奇女俠黛安娜才有了更堅韌的勇氣。這或許就是蝙蝠俠這句話的真實含義，這也才是我們最初熱愛超級英雄的理由。
————分割線————
關於影片的缺點，敘事推進的倉促生硬，動作戲慢鏡頭泛濫，以及最後突兀地落腳到「只有愛才能拯救這個世界」的老調子，都已經有人分析過了。而我失望的地方在於，電影對一戰的刻畫還是流於淺薄了。相較於正義邪惡相對清晰的二戰，一戰是真正的「春秋無義戰」，每個參戰國都是為了自己的私慾和野心，將成千上萬的普通民眾趕向戰場，如同屠宰場的肉牛般。「絞肉機」、「毒氣戰」、「無人區」……這些在一戰里涌現的詞彙，每一個背後都有數不盡的血淚和亡靈。但電影仍舊不自覺地將德軍視作邪惡的一方，只展現了協約國民眾的傷亡，卻幾乎對德國民眾的苦難隻字不提，彷彿是一個翻版的二戰而已。即使是女俠，也說德軍是被阿瑞斯蠱惑了，言下之意即是已經將德國打入對立面。唯一能體現戰爭的荒謬和人性普適的只有這句台詞：
英國的香煙給德國人抽，德國的啤酒給英國人喝，兩邊的人都喜歡同一個作家的書。
正因為「無義戰」，從黛安娜這個局外人（神）的眼光看，這樣無意義的同類相殘才更諷刺、更悲涼。而作為後世的觀眾來看，一想到20年後規模更大、殺戮更甚的二戰，對史蒂夫說的「終結一切戰爭的戰爭」更感到痛心悲哀。假如這一切僅僅歸結到某一方的作惡，而忽視了人類普遍的陰暗面，無疑大大削弱了作品批判的力度，「只有愛才能拯救這個世界」的口號就更顯得荒誕空洞。
這部作品最後就不應該讓女俠得出任何「結論」或「解決方法」。史蒂夫在沒有答案的情況下，依然選擇相信人類，這正是電影所傳達的勇氣。女俠作為一個智慧過人的半神，是受到了人類的感召，才選擇站在人類一邊。她願意和人類一同摸索前進的道路，而不再幼稚地提出「殺死阿瑞斯就能解決一切」，理想國已然遠去，所有人都只能依靠自身的力量走下去，在這一點上，神奇女俠是人類的守望者、相伴者，而不是提供答案的宗教神，這才是《神奇女俠》這部電影最大的價值。
（neets.cc）
H. 英語電影觀後感五篇
功夫熊貓
This film tells us a story about how a mon panda bees a real dragon warrior。 這個電影為我們講述了一個平凡的熊貓怎樣成為一個真正的龍武士的。
At the beginning，the Master Shifu did not believe that the panda can be a courageous dragon warrior。
起初，師傅不相信熊貓能成為勇敢的龍武士。
Through the panda's persistence，he win Master Shifu's acceptance。 透過熊貓堅持不懈的努力，他贏得了師傅的認可。
Master Shifu tries his best to train the panda into a real warrior according to Master Wugu's instruction。
師傅謹遵烏龜的教誨，努力將熊貓培養成真正的武士。
Finally，the panda succeeded in beating their biggest enemy -----the tiger。 最終，熊貓成功的打敗了他們的最大的敵人----虎。
This movie tells us that:every difficulty can be overe as long as you tried your utmost persistently。
這部電影告訴我們這樣一個道理：只要我們堅持不懈的努力，任何困難都能克服
英語電影觀後感
《忠犬八公的故事》
This film is based on a true story 。 That happened in Japan in 1935。So I was moved by the spirit of Hachi!
No one has the ability to show his love to only one person ring his whole life， let alone make friends with only one person; have the food that never changes year by year; do the same damn thing without plaining and consciousness of exhaustion。 We can’t! However， what we could learn from Hachi is that we should never forget the one we once loved。
In fact ， some research and statistics prove that pets are more sensitive in human’s diseases than we do。 Hachi fetched that ball because he knew that his master would die because of his heart disease。 It’s his only way to hold him back 。 Hachi has been waiting in the weeds， waiting for his only fellow to walk him home。 His hope has been floating in the breeze， carrying his loneliness and misery all above the ground。 Maybe professor knows， but he could never e back。
英語電影觀後感
Ice Age 冰河世紀觀後感
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any puter-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo。 In fact， until Shrek， 2001’s rollicking success， I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen。 What is surprising， is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights， apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s， Inc。's second rate， half wit cousin。 Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie， one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs， pterodactyl eggs， and sympathetic cavemen。 This time， it’s the ice age， and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man。 Strangely enough， in this early world， animals can talk， and humans cannot。 But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby， wooly mammoth (Ray Romano)， saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary)， and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home。
Visually， Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen。
Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters， Inc。; or even the gooey， gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters。 No hint of photo-realism here。 It’s like paring a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King。 Actually， I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for。
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and
Leguizamo one liners。 Some of them are even quite funny。 If that is all that we’re going for here， then I suppose I’m all for it。 But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness， which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation。 Frankly， I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters。 The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living， breathing， creatures。 It’s laughable watching their
polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt， soft touches。
Thankfully， the main characters are animals， which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels。 As a result， what slapstick there is， is highly entertaining。 Sure， Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular。 But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation。
The story itself is bland， boring， and uninspired， as is the almost laughably bad animation。 The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct
melon-hoarding dodos。 Ice Age’s edy is worthy of Bugs， but unless you’re under 5， you’ll be bored with everything else。
英語電影觀後感
《弱點》
This is a can't-miss family movie。 After all， EVERYONE seems to like inspiring family films--especially when it's based on real people。 And， not surprisingly， I had a thoroughly good time watching it--though I do remend you see it with a box of Kleenex nearby。
The film is about a young man named Michael Oher--an extremely large black teenager who has bounced from home to home in the foster care system。 Currently， he's in a new school and no one realizes that he has no place to live。 Yet in spite of having a crack-addicted mother， a father who was killed in prison and every other reason to be an angry powder keg， he's a very gentle and sad soul---who is also enormous and has amazing potential to play football。
A nosy but very nice lady (Sandra Bullock) convinces her husband (Tim McGraw) to bring Michael home。。。at least for the night。 But this one night turns into a permanent living situation and he bees an important part of the family。 However， despite this new living arrangement working out well， Michael is so far behind in school and his GPA so low that he hasn't a prayer to play football in college。 That's because although many schools are now offering him athletic scholarships， his GPA is too low to allow him to accept these offers。 So， with his new family's help， perhaps he can pull up those grades and have a future。
This film is super-inspirational and sweet--mostly because it's true。 I am sure that some poetic license was taken when making the film (I especially wonder if the little brother could be THIS precocious and adorable)， but overall they did a good job of sticking reasonably close the facts。 While I loved Sandra Bullock's performance (she's great as usual)， I was a bit surprised that she received Oscar for it--I did see a few performances in other films that year that I thought were a bit better (such as the leading young lady in "Precious")。 Also， Tim McGraw， while a lesser role in the film， did a surprisingly good job--especially as he's really known as a country singer， not an actor。 All around， a very good film and one that is meant to inspire。
英語電影觀後感
Hero is a film that can impress everyone who has seen it。 It
narrates a funny and simple story， but leaves us a lot of thinking
behind。 It explains the definition of hero in a new and creative
way。
The leading role Bernie Lapland was played by the famous
American edian Dustin Hoffman。 He is an ordinary but
unfortunate person who has previous convictions， mon
looking， lawsuit around and a tough ex-wife。 He is even not
liked by his judge who has only met his once。 Sometimes， he is
selfish and rude， but when facing his son， he returns to a
fatherly and attentive father like everyone else。 He happened to
encounter a plane crash at a rainy night， and rescued 54
passengers from the burning plane out of human nature。 He
grasped the chance to act as a hero， but what is dramatic is that
he missed the opportunity to claim the honor。 Meanwhile， a
vagrant called Bobber subsequently steps forward and got the
reward es with the worship from all the citizens。 Lapland
was still regarded as a poor man in jail， not being able to
achieve any kinds of success after doing such a big favor to the passengers。 While， Bobber started to show up in front of public under the glory of being a hero and set out to philanthropy。 He inspired people’s goodness and confidence in life， brought hope to the hopeless and homeless， he has done what a hero should do。 Finally， Bobber came to an agreement with the real hero Lapland， for not breaking people’s belief which had just set up by the man-made hero。
The whole story leads me to think of the definition of hero。 What is hero? Who is a hero? How should heroes behave? Actually， hero is just an ordinary person。 What makes him a hero is that he throws himself into breach when faced with danger， regardless of his own safety。 Then， an ordinary man changed in to a big hero。 It seems that he is so extraordinary among us， but in fact， he is just one of us。 We all can be the hero if we have the chance。 It is a symbol of the goodness indwells in our nature character。 When we put the word hero into the background of 21st century， its eternal aureole seems to fade。 We don’t need a hero to save the whole world any more， and we no longer wait for a hero to rescue our life。 We live in peace and harmony， and hero walks away from our life at the same time。 At the same time， when our country’s interest
meets danger or some one’s life is in risks， heroes who used to be pipsqueaks will rush out and break into our eyes。 The heroes who have made such great salvation can be everyone， they maybe our neighbors， our relatives， our friends or even someone we don’t know。 They are different from the bygone heroes who usually appear in front of every trouble， who can be read on text books， who used to be arranged at the frontier line of any kinds of danger。 Heroes now are mon people， but show up great courage and ability to bonder the responsibility to protect human lives and the peace of the world。 Heroes are just the ones e our boldly when somebody else are in jeopardy。
We all have the potential to be a hero， may be the only thing we need is the right opportunity。 Heroes are hidden in every corner of our society; they do their job silently and stay far from the media， they will never declare who they are and what they have done to public。 But， we cannot deny that they are real heroes。