外國電影的英文影評
⑴ 外國電影英文觀後感
after seen the movie named《Dvinch code》,i have known that human』s borning characterristics can be very cruel,the only way we can defeat it is distroy is and let everything born agian.Human Instrumentailty can be a very good example.
What we should do is clean our crime by instrumen our heart.
⑵ 英文電影影評
Julie & Julia is a 2009 American comedy-drama film written and directed by Nora Ephron starring Meryl Streep, Stanley Tucci, Amy Adams, and Chris Messina. The film contrasts the life of chef Julia Child in the early years of her culinary career with the life of young New Yorker Julie Powell, who aspires to cook all 524 recipes in Child's cookbook in 365 days, a challenge she described on her popular blog that would make her a published author.
Ephron's screenplay is adapted from two books: My Life in France, Child's autobiography written with Alex Prud'homme, and a memoir by Julie Powell documenting online her daily experiences cooking each of the 524 recipes in Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking, and she later began reworking that blog, The Julie/Julia Project。 Both of these books were written and published in the same time frame (2004–06). The film is the first major motion picture based on a blog。這是我最喜歡的一部電影之一,我在維基網路上找的資料,你根據那裡的資料改一改,至於觀點,你可以寫堅持自己的興趣和愛好這一方面,寫興趣是最好的老師什麼的,給你個鏈接
⑶ 求篇英文電影的中英文影評
阿甘正傳觀後感 阿甘正傳影評(中英文對照) 英文電影
阿甘正傳 Forrest Gump
Mr. Gump has his own perseverance, keeping on running without any reason, JUST RUN. He said: 「Man has to look forward, and never encumbers by foretime. I think that's the meaning of my running.」 Say goodbye to foretime and don't stay in-place. Although so many people in the world are used to following others and few people can stick to one thing, Mr. Gump does and becomes 「GOD」. There is another character Lieutenant Dan. Dan lost his legs in Vietnam War. He said that his fate was death in war. However, Mr.Gump saved him and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life, complaining that Gumpshouldn't save him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing with Gump, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank Gump's help. The movie is intended to tell people that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always after clouds. The key point is that whether we have a good mind and an opportunity to ourselves to change bad situation. The movie also sends such a message to us: do well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will be a miracle if there is perseverance.
阿甘有自己的堅持,他不斷地跑步,JUST RUNS. 他跑步不為任何理由。他說:"人要往前看,千萬不要被過去拖累。我想我跑步就是這個意義」和過去告別,不停留在原處。也許這世界上太多人隨撥逐流,很少人會堅持做一件事,阿甘堅持自己的堅持,於是他成了「神」。影片中還有一位主要人物是丹中尉。他在越南戰爭中失去了雙腿。他說他的命運就是戰死。然而阿甘卻救他,讓他活了下來。失去雙腿後他開始憎恨生活,生活得很頹廢,責怪阿甘當初救了他。然而當他調整心態,去和阿甘一起捕魚生活,有了收獲後,開始感覺到生活的美好。感謝阿甘當初就了他。影片試圖通過這個角色告訴觀者生活總是美好的。烏雲後有彩虹,絕境後有重生。關鍵是看我們給不給自己一個好心態,一個機會去改變不好的現狀。影片試圖向觀者傳達這樣一個信息:或許做好我們該做的每一件事,生活就會給我們一個好的回饋。只要有一種堅持就會出現一個奇跡。
⑷ 跪求十部英文電影的英文觀後感(每部50字),謝謝
把「『影視評論』 [電影眾論]百年十大經典影片(外國部分)」復制到網路搜索,然後點擊第一個詞條,裡面是中文的,不知道幫得到你不。。。
⑸ 求經典外國電影影評---要英文版本的
珍珠港的影評
pearl harbour film review
Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.
Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?
If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.
Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions
⑹ 電影英文影評
極地特快:
Rarely does a movie let you forget who you are and become the main character. This is one of those rare movies.
The movie starts out with a story that every Santa believer experienced. On Christmas eve a boy in Grand Rapids Michigan has reached the age where the statistical impossibility in the Santa story ( the size and speed of Santa's sleigh, the north pole being a barren wasteland) are causing him to doubt the big mans existence. Not knowing for sure the boy drifts into a deep sleep. At 11:55 PM the boy is awakened by the arrival of the Polar Express literally outside his front door. Going to investigate what is going on the boy meets the witty conctor of the Christmas eve train. (Tom Hanks)who informs him that the train is headed to the north pole so the kids can meet Santa Clause. Not totally sure that the train is going to the north pole but to curious to let it go the boy climbs on board. The adventure puts the boy in contact with a girl who is a natural born leader and who's belief in the Christmas magic couldn't be stronger. Other characters include a know it all socially awkward boy, a young underprivileged loner who has never experienced the magic of Christmas and a cast of other more mysterious characters such a a hobo ghost. Through the adventure the combination of great music, flawless animation and fantastic dialog really make you believe you are there and let you relive those days when you thought Santa Clause just might exist. The story ends on Christmas day with a line (narrated by Tom Hanks) about belief that brings back those kid on Christmas eve chills all over again. The themes of belief and friendship are a strong theme in the movie and part of the magic that brings you back to a time when you did believe.Its a great movie for children and alts alike and rekindles the Christmas magic that us alts lost many years ago.
⑺ 求一部電影的英文影評
Romantic comedy has never had a strong basis in logic and this was never more apparent than in "Kate & Leopold", Meg Ryan's mb but enjoyable return to the romantic comedy fray.
Ryan plays Ally McBeal-alike Kate, a career-orientated New Yorker with romance issues. She lives in an apartment below her ex, Stuart (Schreiber), a scientist who discovers - as you do - a time portal just off the Brooklyn Bridge. Travelling back to 1876, Stuart accidentally brings Leopold (Jackman), an English ke, back to the present day with him.
Kate clashes with Leopold initially, only to be won over by his dashing English charm (the English being big on charm in the 19th century, of course). But, as he's Stuart's great-grandfather, Leopold must return to his own time to keep the family line intact, leaving Kate to decide between a future in the present or the past.
With its mostly nonsensical plot, "Kate & Leopold" is the kind of sentimental flight of fancy where romance and chivalry preside over narrative logic. Never mind how the time travel works, if you care enough about the fate of these two likable leads, then common sense is irrelevant to the film's enjoyment factor.
Enjoying more success here than in his previous romantic comedy "Someone Like You", Hugh Jackman has the looks, decorum, and comic timing to capture Leopold's persona. He's the highlight of the film, and some of the most amusing scenes are between Leopold and Kate's brother, Charlie (Meyer), an unemployed actor who thinks Leopold's anachronistic persona is an extreme form of method acting.
Hilarious at times, unbearably soppy at others, "Kate & Leopold" is comfortable viewing for old romantics.
⑻ 求好看的國外電影的英語影評
[127小時] 在夾縫中重生
<127小時>是一部值得深思的電影,影片講述探險者阿倫在一次戶外探險中發生意外,手臂被滾落的石頭夾在石縫中不能動彈,經過五天的思想斗爭,阿倫泱定用小刀割斷手臂並成功逃生.真實事件改編足以引起關注,沒有復雜的電影手法與語言,導演丹爾保爾將阿倫被困五天內的幻想影象化,並採用半紀錄片的方式展現.主演詹姆斯 弗朗哥的表演也將阿倫被困的冷靜到急燥到害怕再到絕望表現的淋漓盡致.影片的高潮就在那三分鍾的斷臂,導演做的很好,適可而止的血腥加上緊張十足的配樂再加上詹姆斯的表演,成就了這場精彩的斷臂戲,使觀眾體會到了阿倫的痛苦.這是丹尼保爾的又一力作,一部奧斯卡級別的作品,一部證明詹姆斯 弗朗哥演技技的影片. 個人評分8.5 imdb評分8.3
⑼ 外國電影的英文觀後感
羅馬假日英文觀後感 The story is about a young princess (公主) (Hepburn) named Ann, making a goodwill (善意的) tour of Europe's capitals. She is tired of the responsibility (職責) and demands of the role she has been born in to and longs to experience the every day pleasures of an ordinary person. In Rome she finally rebels. Waiting until after everyone in the embassy (大使館) where her party is staying has gone to sleep, she slips out a window and finds herself alone on the streets of Rome. She is found by Joe Bradley (Peck), a hardened (堅毅的) and somewhat cynical (憤世 嫉俗的) reporter, on his way home from a late night card game. Not knowing who she is but seeing that she has no place to stay he takes pity on her and invites her to his apartment for the night. In a comical (滑稽的) scene, he offers her a pair of his pajamas (睡衣) and points to the couch where she can sleep. Innocent (天真的) aristocrat (貴族) that she is, she asks for a nightgown and help undressing. Bradley helps her take off her tie and then leaves the room. When he returns a few minutes later he discovers her sound asleep on the bed, leaving him the couch (沙發). Leaving her sleeping the next morning, Bradley shows up late for work and tries to cover himself by saying that he had an interview (采訪) with the princess. But his editor shows him a newspaper with her picture and headline stating that she was taken ill the night before and canceled all appointments (安排) for the day. Bradley immediately realizes who he has in his apartment and gets the editor to agree to pay $5,000 if he can get a real interview with the princess. On the way out Bradley contacts a photographer (攝影師) friend, Irving Radovich (Albert) and arranges for him to met him later with his camera for a big scoop. Returning to his apartment, Bradley picks up the princess for their planned tour of the city. Bradley's real aim is to get the pictures and story he promised (答應) his editor. But the innocent charm of the princess softens him and the two start to fall in love. They end up having a good time and some comical adventures (冒險). Bradley conceals the fact that he is a reporter who knows who she really is and she doesn't tell him that that she is a royal princess. But in the end the truth comes out and the princess realizes that her ty to her country and family come first and she reluctantly (不情願地) returns to her official role. The two meet briefly at the end ring her press conference with other reporters. She addresses Bradley as Mr. Bradley just like the others. As he is leaving, Bradley, quietly slips her the photos that his friend Irving had taken and lets her know that his story and pictures of their time together will never be published (公布). The charming Audrey Hepburn plays a modern princess who takes a day on Rome. She meets up with reporter Peck and wise-cracking photographer Albert. Peck and Hepburn fall in love, though Peck plans to sell an "exclusive story with the princess." Roman Holiday is a fun romantic comedy, but stays realistic (現實) with its commentary on society and royalty. Roman Holiday Thanks to some recommendations from my friends , I have recently enjoyed lots of nice films. And last week, the film 『Roman Holiday』 has impressed me a lot. As a remarkable work in the film history, this film is really worth watching. It can be summarized in such a delightful story (This may be a spoilerJ): Princess Anne, who was performed by Audrey Hepburn, was getting bored with her restricted schele when she was on a publicized tour to Rome. One night, she sneaked out of her luxurious residence and fell asleep on a public bench in central Rome. However, she was found by Joe Bradley, an American newspaper reporter, who was performed by Gregory Peck. Joe took her home without knowing who she truly was. Anyway, he was subject to make a big fortune by secretly interview the princess when the truth turned out. But instead of that, after showing Ann around the city and having a good time with her, he forced himself to say farewell to her, for he knew the romance between them oughtn』t to be happened because of their great difference in standing, even though they had fallen in love with each other. The end of the romantic film is really disappointing to most of the audience, though it ought to be imagined at first. However, Audrey Hepburn had successfully performed Ann as a naughty, naive and sweet angel, who ordered a glass of expensive champagne without thinking, who curiously had her first cigarette, who fell in love with a poor but kind man, and who finally firmly returned to the place she hated, only because of her responsibility. She was really charming and graceful, not only from her innocent eyes and expressions, but also from her particular character.